Skip Navigation


Mol. Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on May 30, 2007
Molecular Human Reproduction 2007 13(8):521-526; doi:10.1093/molehr/gam035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/8/521    most recent
gam035v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Altmäe, S.
Right arrow Articles by Salumets, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Altmäe, S.
Right arrow Articles by Salumets, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Allelic estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene variants predict the outcome of ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization

Signe Altmäe1,2, Kadri Haller3, Maire Peters3, Outi Hovatta2, Anneli Stavreus-Evers2, Helle Karro3, Andres Metspalu1,4 and Andres Salumets1,3,5,6

1 Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Estonian Genome Project, University of Tartu and Estonian Biocentre, 51010 Tartu, Estonia 2 Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tartu, Lossi 36, 51003 Tartu, Estonia 4 Molecular Diagnostic Centre, Tartu University Clinicum, Oru 3, 51005 Tartu, Estonia 5 Nova Vita Clinic, Centre for Infertility Treatment and Medical Genetics, Kaluri tee 5A, Haabneeme, 74001 Viimsi, Harjumaa, Estonia

6 Correspondence address. Tel: +372-5620-4004; Fax: +372-605-9608; E-mail: asalumets{at}novavita.ee

The outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) depends substantially on the effectiveness of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) induced by administration of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). In COH, endogenously produced estrogens extend the action of FSH in stimulating folliculogenesis. We determined the associations between genetic variations in estrogen receptor ESR1 and ESR2 genes and etiology of female infertility, and analysed the influence of these variations on COH outcome—the quantity and quality of oocytes retrieved. ESR1 PvuII T/C (rs2234693) and XbaI A/G (rs9340799) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and (TA)n microsatellite polymorphism, as well as ESR2 RsaI G/A (rs1256049) SNP and (CA)n microsatellite polymorphism were genotyped in 159 IVF patients. The ovarian response to FSH was diminished in patients with endometriosis when compared to tubal factor infertility. ESR1 PvuII and XbaI as well as ESR2 RsaI SNPs were associated with the microsatellite length of the respective genes. Shorter ESR1 (TA)n was linked with a higher risk for unexplained infertility, whereas longer ESR1 (TA)n associated with PvuII*C allele were predictive of a better COH, but not clinical pregnancy outcome in an age-independent manner. These data suggest the variations in ESR1 gene, in addition to the age of a woman, may predict the COH outcome in IVF.

Key words: estrogen receptor gene/in vitro fertilization/controlled ovarian hyperstimulation

Submitted on April 7, 2007; accepted on April 16, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.