Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flaherty, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flaherty, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, C. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction Vol. 2, NUMBER 12 pp. 937-942, 1996
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1996


research-article

Application of modern molecular techniques to evaluate sperm sex selection methods

Sean P. Flaherty1 and Colin D. Matthews

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woodville, SA 5011, Australia

To whom correspondence should be addressed at: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

The aim of this paper is to review modern approaches which have been used to evaluate sex preselection procedures. Two approaches can be used, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). FISH is currently the method of choice for evaluating sex selection procedures because: (i) FISH accurately identifies the sex chromosome of individual spermatozoa using specific probes for the X and Y chromosomes and a two-colour detection system; and (ii) large numbers of spermatozoa can be screened in a short period of time. Of the published sex pre-selection methods tested using FISH, only flow cytometry has been shown to produce a clinically significant enrichment of X- and/or Y-bearing human spermatozoa. Studies have shown that 12-step Percoll gradients produce a slight but clinically insignificant enrichment of X-bearing spermatozoa, swim-up techniques do not appgar to enrich either X- or Y-bearing spermatozoa, and discontinuous albumin gradients do not enrich Y-bearing spermatozoa. Despite this evidence, some of these methods continue to be used clinically, so it is vital that sex selection methods are properly evaluated using reliable methods such as double-label FISH before they are introduced for clinical use.

FISH/PCR/sex selection/X chromosome/Y chromosome


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.