Molecular Human Reproduction Vol. 2, NUMBER 3 pp. 139-144, 1996
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1996
research-article |
Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa
1Clinic for Infertility and Geynaecological Endocrinology-WHO Collaborating Centre, Hôpital Universite de Genève 20 rue Alcide-Jentzer, 1211 Genève 14, Switzerland 2Department of Animal Biology, University of Modena Modena, Italy
To whom correspondence should be addressed at: 3To whom correspondence should be addressed
This study aimed to investigate the association between anomalies in sperm chromatin packaging, morphology and fertilization in patients undergoing routine in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or subzonal insemination (SUZI). Sperm chromatin packaging was assessed using chromomycin A3 (CMA3), a fluorochrome specific for guanine-cytosine rich sequences of DNA. One hundred to 150 sperm cells were assessed in 55 patients to compare sperm chromatin packaging and morphology to fertilization after IVF or SUZI. When the morphology and CMA3 fluorescence of individual spermatozoa was assessed, >75% of the macrocephalic sperm fluoresced in all patients. In contrast a mean of 37% of the spermatozoa with normal morphology fluoresced in IVF patients compared with 58% of the normal spermatozoa in male factor patients treated by SUZI. SUZI patients displaying a high fluorescence (>70%) in their spermatozoa also had a significantly lower fertilization rate. Lower packaging quality in morphologically normal spermatozoa may represent a major limiting factor in the fertilizing ability of male factor patients. This study confirms that a high percentage of CMA3 positivity is present in certain forms of male factor infertility and that such a test may be used to distinguish separate populations in morphologically normal spermatozoa.
chromatin/chromomycin A3/in-vitro fertilization/male infertility/spermatozoa
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A.M. Codrington, B.F. Hales, and B. Robaire Exposure of male rats to cyclophosphamide alters the chromatin structure and basic proteome in spermatozoa Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1431 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Singleton, A. Zalensky, G.F. Doncel, M. Morshedi, and I.A. Zalenskaya Testis/sperm-specific histone 2B in the sperm of donors and subfertile patients: variability and relation to chromatin packaging Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 743 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Borini, N. Tarozzi, D. Bizzaro, M.A. Bonu, L. Fava, C. Flamigni, and G. Coticchio Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2876 - 2881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Oliva Protamines and male infertility Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 417 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Moustafa, R. K. Sharma, J. Thornton, E. Mascha, M. A. Abdel-Hafez, A. J. Thomas, and A. Agarwal Relationship between ROS production, apoptosis and DNA denaturation in spermatozoa from patients examined for infertility Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 129 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mengual, J. L. Ballesca, C. Ascaso, and R. Oliva Marked Differences in Protamine Content and P1/P2 Ratios in Sperm Cells From Percoll Fractions Between Patients and Controls J Androl, May 1, 2003; 24(3): 438 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Abu-Hassan and S. Al-Hasani The use of ICSI for all cases of in-vitro conception Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 893 - 894. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. El-Ghobashy and C. R. West The Human Sperm Head: A Key for Successful Fertilization J Androl, March 1, 2003; 24(2): 232 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tomsu, V. Sharma, and D. Miller Embryo quality and IVF treatment outcomes may correlate with different sperm comet assay parameters Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1856 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.J. Tomlinson, O. Moffatt, G.C. Manicardi, D. Bizzaro, M. Afnan, and D. Sakkas Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2160 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Molina, J.A. Castilla, J.L. Castano, J. Fontes, N. Mendoza, and L. Martinez Chromatin status in human ejaculated spermatozoa from infertile patients and relationship to seminal parameters Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 16(3): 534 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.L. Larson, C.J. DeJonge, A.M. Barnes, L.K. Jost, and D.P. Evenson Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters as predictors of failed pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2000; 15(8): 1717 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sakkas, G.C. Manicardi, M. Tomlinson, M. Mandrioli, D. Bizzaro, P.G. Bianchi, and U. Bianchi The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1112 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.D. Esterhuizen, D.R. Franken, J.G.H. Lourens, E. Prinsloo, and L.H. van Rooyen Sperm chromatin packaging as an indicator of in-vitro fertilization rates Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 657 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.V. Filatov, E.V. Semenova, O.A. Vorob'eva, O.A. Leont'eva, and E.A. Drobchenko Relationship between abnormal sperm chromatin packing and IVF results Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 5(9): 825 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Spano, E. Cordelli, G. Leter, F. Lombardo, A. Lenzi, and L. Gandini Nuclear chromatin variations in human spermatozoa undergoing swim-up and cryopreservation evaluated by the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure assay Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 5(1): 29 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



