Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bianchi, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sakkas, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bianchi, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sakkas, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction Vol. 2, NUMBER 3 pp. 139-144, 1996
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1996


research-article

Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa

Patrizia Grace Bianchi1, Gian Carlo Manicardi2, Françoise Urner1, Aldo Campana1 and Denny Sakkas1,3

1Clinic for Infertility and Geynaecological Endocrinology-WHO Collaborating Centre, Hôpital Universite de Genève 20 rue Alcide-Jentzer, 1211 Genève 14, Switzerland 2Department of Animal Biology, University of Modena Modena, Italy

To whom correspondence should be addressed at: 3To whom correspondence should be addressed

This study aimed to investigate the association between anomalies in sperm chromatin packaging, morphology and fertilization in patients undergoing routine in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or subzonal insemination (SUZI). Sperm chromatin packaging was assessed using chromomycin A3 (CMA3), a fluorochrome specific for guanine-cytosine rich sequences of DNA. One hundred to 150 sperm cells were assessed in 55 patients to compare sperm chromatin packaging and morphology to fertilization after IVF or SUZI. When the morphology and CMA3 fluorescence of individual spermatozoa was assessed, >75% of the macrocephalic sperm fluoresced in all patients. In contrast a mean of 37% of the spermatozoa with normal morphology fluoresced in IVF patients compared with 58% of the normal spermatozoa in male factor patients treated by SUZI. SUZI patients displaying a high fluorescence (>70%) in their spermatozoa also had a significantly lower fertilization rate. Lower packaging quality in morphologically normal spermatozoa may represent a major limiting factor in the fertilizing ability of male factor patients. This study confirms that a high percentage of CMA3 positivity is present in certain forms of male factor infertility and that such a test may be used to distinguish separate populations in morphologically normal spermatozoa.

chromatin/chromomycin A3/in-vitro fertilization/male infertility/spermatozoa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.M. Codrington, B.F. Hales, and B. Robaire
Exposure of male rats to cyclophosphamide alters the chromatin structure and basic proteome in spermatozoa
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1431 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Singleton, A. Zalensky, G.F. Doncel, M. Morshedi, and I.A. Zalenskaya
Testis/sperm-specific histone 2B in the sperm of donors and subfertile patients: variability and relation to chromatin packaging
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 743 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Borini, N. Tarozzi, D. Bizzaro, M.A. Bonu, L. Fava, C. Flamigni, and G. Coticchio
Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2876 - 2881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R. Oliva
Protamines and male infertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 417 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. H. Moustafa, R. K. Sharma, J. Thornton, E. Mascha, M. A. Abdel-Hafez, A. J. Thomas, and A. Agarwal
Relationship between ROS production, apoptosis and DNA denaturation in spermatozoa from patients examined for infertility
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 129 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
L. Mengual, J. L. Ballesca, C. Ascaso, and R. Oliva
Marked Differences in Protamine Content and P1/P2 Ratios in Sperm Cells From Percoll Fractions Between Patients and Controls
J Androl, May 1, 2003; 24(3): 438 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Abu-Hassan and S. Al-Hasani
The use of ICSI for all cases of in-vitro conception
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 893 - 894.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. A. El-Ghobashy and C. R. West
The Human Sperm Head: A Key for Successful Fertilization
J Androl, March 1, 2003; 24(2): 232 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Tomsu, V. Sharma, and D. Miller
Embryo quality and IVF treatment outcomes may correlate with different sperm comet assay parameters
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1856 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Tomlinson, O. Moffatt, G.C. Manicardi, D. Bizzaro, M. Afnan, and D. Sakkas
Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2160 - 2165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Molina, J.A. Castilla, J.L. Castano, J. Fontes, N. Mendoza, and L. Martinez
Chromatin status in human ejaculated spermatozoa from infertile patients and relationship to seminal parameters
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 16(3): 534 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K.L. Larson, C.J. DeJonge, A.M. Barnes, L.K. Jost, and D.P. Evenson
Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters as predictors of failed pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2000; 15(8): 1717 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Sakkas, G.C. Manicardi, M. Tomlinson, M. Mandrioli, D. Bizzaro, P.G. Bianchi, and U. Bianchi
The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1112 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.D. Esterhuizen, D.R. Franken, J.G.H. Lourens, E. Prinsloo, and L.H. van Rooyen
Sperm chromatin packaging as an indicator of in-vitro fertilization rates
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 657 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M.V. Filatov, E.V. Semenova, O.A. Vorob'eva, O.A. Leont'eva, and E.A. Drobchenko
Relationship between abnormal sperm chromatin packing and IVF results
Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 5(9): 825 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Spano, E. Cordelli, G. Leter, F. Lombardo, A. Lenzi, and L. Gandini
Nuclear chromatin variations in human spermatozoa undergoing swim-up and cryopreservation evaluated by the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure assay
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 5(1): 29 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.