Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thie, M.
Right arrow Articles by Denker, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thie, M.
Right arrow Articles by Denker, H. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol 3, 275-283, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Adhesiveness of the free surface of a human endometrial monolayer for trophoblast as related to actin cytoskeleton

M Thie, P Herter, H Pommerenke, F Durr, F Sieckmann, B Nebe, J Rychly and HW Denker
Institute of Anatomy, University of Essen Medical School, Germany.

Adhesiveness of the apical (free) plasma membrane of uterine epithelial cells for trophoblast is essential for the process of human embryo implantation. As epithelial cells are normally repellent, i.e. apically non-adhesive, we argue that a remodelling of the epithelial organization from a polarized to a non-polarized phenotype might prepare the apical pole for cell-cell adhesion during the so-called receptive phase. To identify details of apical adhesiveness we examined human epithelial RL95-2 cells (RL cells) which, in contrast to other cell lines, allow trophoblast to adhere to their apical plasma membrane. To determine whether the cytoskeletal structure is functionally critical for adhesiveness for trophoblast, RL cells were treated with actin depolymerizing cytochalasin D, i.e. 0.4 microM for 120 min. Changes in adhesiveness for trophoblast were monitored with a centrifugal force-based adhesion assay. Moreover, ultrastructural features, organization of the actin network and expression of integrins, i.e. alpha 6, beta 1, beta 4, were studied using electron microscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy and cell surface immunogold-labelling techniques. Changes in transmission of mechanical signals via integrins into uterine cells were examined using a magnetic drag force device, thereby monitoring intracellular calcium responses. The results suggest that adhesiveness of the free surface of RL cells for human trophoblast requires an intact but non-polarized actin cytoskeleton, apically localized integrins linked to actin, and calcium signalling originating at the free surface.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Uchida, T. Maruyama, K. Ohta, M. Ono, T. Arase, M. Kagami, H. Oda, T. Kajitani, H. Asada, and Y. Yoshimura
Histone deacetylase inhibitor-induced glycodelin enhances the initial step of implantation
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2615 - 2622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H.-Y. Li, S.-P. Chang, C.-C. Yuan, H.-T. Chao, H.-T. Ng, and Y.-J. Sung
Induction of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Mediated Apoptosis Is Involved in Outgrowth of Trophoblast Cells on Endometrial Epithelial Cells in a Model of Human Trophoblast-Endometrial Interactions
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2003; 69(5): 1515 - 1524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Kosaka, H. Fujiwara, K. Tatsumi, S. Yoshioka, T. Higuchi, Y. Sato, T. Nakayama, and S. Fujii
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells enhance cell-cell interaction between human endometrial epithelial cells and BeWo-cell spheroids
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C. Heneweer, L. H. Kruse, F. Kindhauser, M. Schmidt, K. H. Jakobs, H.-W. Denker, and M. Thie
Adhesiveness of human uterine epithelial RL95-2 cells to trophoblast: Rho protein regulation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 8(11): 1014 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
H. Tinel, H.-W. Denker, and M. Thie
Calcium influx in human uterine epithelial RL95-2 cells triggers adhesiveness for trophoblast-like cells. Model studies on signalling events during embryo implantation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 6(12): 1119 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. C. Martín, M. J. Jasper, D. Valbuena, M. Meseguer, J. Remohí, A. Pellicer, and C. Simón
Increased Adhesiveness in Cultured Endometrial-Derived Cells Is Related to the Absence of Moesin Expression
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2000; 63(5): 1370 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.A. Sarani, M. Ghaffari-Novin, M.A. Warren, P. Dockery, and I.D. Cooke
Morphological evidence for the `implantation window' in human luminal endometrium
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 3101 - 3106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Ghosh, S. Dhara, A. Kumar, and J. Sengupta
Immunohistochemical localization of receptors for progesterone and oestradiol-17{beta} in the implantation site of the rhesus monkey
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 1999; 14(2): 505 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U. Bentin-Ley, A. Sjogren, L. Nilsson, L. Hamberger, J.F. Larsen, and T. Horn
Presence of uterine pinopodes at the embryo–endometrial interface during human implantation in vitro
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 1999; 14(2): 515 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.