Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steger, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steger, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol 4, 227-233, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The proliferation of spermatogonia in normal and pathological human seminiferous epithelium: an immunohistochemical study using monoclonal antibodies against Ki-67 protein and proliferating cell nuclear antigen

K Steger, I Aleithe, H Behre and M Bergmann
Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany.

The quantitative distribution pattern of Ki-67 protein and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunoreactivity was studied in human testis biopsies. In normal seminiferous epithelium Ki-67 is expressed in nuclei of spermatogonia, while PCNA additionally occurs in nuclei of primary spermatocytes. The staining pattern of spermatogonia is as follows (Ki-67-positive/PCNA-positive): 26.6 +/- 12.4%/46.3 +/- 9.5%. No stage-dependent differences were found. Biopsies with mixed atrophy (score < or =7) showed a significant (P < 0.05) decrease of immunopositive spermatogonia to 19.9 +/- 3.0%/31.4 +/- 5.7% (score 1) with minimal variation between different samples (score 7 to 1). Associated with defined histological defects such as hypospermatogenesis (hyp), spermatogenic arrest at the level of spermatids (sda), spermatocytes (sca) or spermatogonia (sga), however, there was a significant (P < 0.05) decrease of Ki-67 staining in tubules showing hyp (28.6 +/- 8.8%), sda (25.6 +/- 9.3%), sca (23.7 +/- 9.3%) and sga (16.2 +/- 6.0%) and of PCNA staining in sca (32.2 +/- 11.8%) and sga (20.0 +/- 9.5%), respectively. The decrease of immunoreactive spermatogonia did not correspond to elevation of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). These data demonstrate that the low spermatogenic efficiency in infertile men is not only due to postmeiotic events, but also to a decrease in the meiotic activity of spermatogonia, and is not related to serum FSH.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. M. Ruwanpura, R. I. McLachlan, K. L. Matthiesson, and S. J. Meachem
Gonadotrophins regulate germ cell survival, not proliferation, in normal adult men
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 403 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Jarvis, D. J. Elliott, D. Morgan, R. Winston, and C. Readhead
Molecular markers for the assessment of postnatal male germ cell development in the mouse
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 108 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
I. Fenic, V. Sonnack, K. Failing, M. Bergmann, and K. Steger
In Vivo Effects of Histone-Deacetylase Inhibitor Trichostatin-A on Murine Spermatogenesis
J Androl, September 1, 2004; 25(5): 811 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.J.H. Kelnar, C. McKinnell, M. Walker, K.D. Morris, W.H.B. Wallace, P.T.K. Saunders, H.M. Fraser, and R.M. Sharpe
Testicular changes during infantile 'quiescence' in the marmoset and their gonadotrophin dependence: a model for investigating susceptibility of the prepubertal human testis to cancer therapy?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1367 - 1378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.