Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Motta, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by de Gimeno, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Motta, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by de Gimeno, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 5, No. 11, 1011-1016, November 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Regulation of ovarian function

The involvement of nitric oxide in corpus luteum regression in the rat: feedback mechanism between prostaglandin F2{alpha} and nitric oxide

Alicia B. Motta1, Alejandra Estevez and Martha Fernandez de Gimeno

Centro de Estudios Farmacológicos y Botánicos (CEFYBO), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Serrano 669, (1414) Buenos Aires, Argentina

Abstract

In the corpus luteum (CL), prostaglandin F2{alpha} (PGF2{alpha}) is a physiological agent with luteolytic actions. Nitric oxide (NO) is a messenger molecule capable of modulating diverse pathophysiological processes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of ovarian NO in PGE (a luteotrophic prostanoid) and PGF2{alpha} (a luteolytic prostanoid) production and in progesterone synthesis during CL regression in the rat. To obtain a longer functional CL, we used a pseudopregnant (PSP) rat model. By means of intrabursa ovarian sac treatment of two competitive nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors, NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA, 1 mg/kg) and NW-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME; 3 mg/kg), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 0.05 mg/kg) as a NO generator, we found that NO, produced by the ovarian tissue during the last 2 days of CL development (days 8 and 9), increased PGF2{alpha} production in the ovary and diminished serum progesterone concentrations leading to CL involution. We also proposed a positive feedback mechanism between PGF2{alpha} and NO, to ensure luteal regression. Thus, we injected intraperitoneally a luteolytic dose (3 µg/kg) of a synthetic PGF2{alpha} during the mid and late phase of CL development. Ovarian NOS activity was evaluated. The results confirmed our hypothesis; we did not see any effect in the mid-stage of CL development, but increased ovarian NOS activity was found in PGF2{alpha}-injected late pseudopregnant rats.

corpus luteum/luteolysis/nitric oxide/prostaglandins/rat

Notes

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K. Shirasuna, S. Watanabe, T. Asahi, M. P B Wijayagunawardane, K. Sasahara, C. Jiang, M. Matsui, M. Sasaki, T. Shimizu, J. S Davis, et al.
Prostaglandin F2{alpha} increases endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the periphery of the bovine corpus luteum: the possible regulation of blood flow at an early stage of luteolysis
Reproduction, April 1, 2008; 135(4): 527 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. Stocco, C. Telleria, and G. Gibori
The Molecular Control of Corpus Luteum Formation, Function, and Regression
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2007; 28(1): 117 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. B. Hapon, A. B Motta, M. Ezquer, M. Bonafede, and G. A Jahn
Hypothyroidism prolongs corpus luteum function in the pregnant rat
Reproduction, January 1, 2007; 133(1): 197 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
A. V. Orozco, Z. Sosa, V. Fillipa, F. Mohamed, and A. M. Rastrilla
The cholinergic influence on the mesenteric ganglion affects the liberation of ovarian steroids and nitric oxide in oestrus day rats: characterization of an ex vivo system
J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 191(3): 587 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Rosiansky-Sultan, E. Klipper, K. Spanel-Borowski, and R. Meidan
Inverse Relationship between Nitric Oxide Synthases and Endothelin-1 Synthesis in Bovine Corpus Luteum: Interactions at the Level of Luteal Endothelial Cell
Endocrinology, November 1, 2006; 147(11): 5228 - 5235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
E. Elia, V. Sander, C.G. Luchetti, M.E. Solano, G. Di Girolamo, C. Gonzalez, and A.B. Motta
The mechanisms involved in the action of metformin in regulating ovarian function in hyperandrogenized mice
Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 12(8): 475 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. K. Yadav, G. Lakshmi, and R. Medhamurthy
Prostaglandin F2{alpha}-mediated Activation of Apoptotic Signaling Cascades in the Corpus Luteum during Apoptosis: INVOLVEMENT OF CASPASE-ACTIVATED DNase
J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 10357 - 10367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. Tamanini, G. Basini, F. Grasselli, and M. Tirelli
Nitric oxide and the ovary
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E1 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A.B. Motta, A. Estevez, T. Tognetti, M.A.F. Gimeno, and A.M. Franchi
Dual effects of nitric oxide in functional and regressing rat corpus luteum
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 43 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
B. E. Friden, E. Runesson, M. Hahlin, and M. Brannstrom
Evidence for nitric oxide acting as a luteolytic factor in the human corpus luteum
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 6(5): 397 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.