Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ottander, U.
Right arrow Articles by Olofsson, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ottander, U.
Right arrow Articles by Olofsson, J. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 5, No. 5, 391-395, May 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Functional evidence for divergent receptor activation mechanisms of luteotrophic and luteolytic events in the human corpus luteum

Ulrika Ottander1, Constant H.B. Leung2 and Jan I. Olofsson1,3

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University Hospital, S-901 85 Umeå, and 2 Department of Physiology, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden

Using a dispersed human luteal cell culture model, progesterone synthesis following treatment by incremental doses of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and the stable prostaglandin F2{alpha} (PGF2{alpha}) analogue cloprostenol, alone or in combination, was related to corpora lutea (CL) mRNA transcript abundance coding for the luteinizing hormone (LH)/HCG receptor (LH-R) and PGF2{alpha}-receptor (FP) by semi-quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) in 33 otherwise healthy women, scheduled for surgery due to benign conditions. CL were grouped according to age, based on the occurrence of a preovulatory LH surge where post-LH days 2–5 were designated as early luteal phase; days 6–10 as mid-luteal phase and days 11–14 as late luteal phase. When exposed to HCG, maximal progesterone output was raised 2.2-fold (P = 0.08, n = 5) compared with untreated controls in the early CL, while it increased 5.7- and 4.6-fold in the mid- and late groups respectively (P < 0.05, n = 4 mid-luteal phase, n = 3 late luteal phase). This stimulation pattern was found to be concordant with the value of mRNA coding for LH-R in all groups (n = 6 early luteal phase, n = 5 mid-luteal phase, n = 6 late luteal phase). The integrated response to HCG and cloprostenol showed a dose-dependent 60% inhibition of progesterone production, but only in late luteal phase luteal cells (P < 0.01, n = 3). FP mRNA values were lowest in early luteal phase, and increased with the age of the CL. Interestingly, lowest CL tissue concentrations of the natural FP agonist PGF2{alpha}, were found during mid-luteal phase while it increased again 1.6-fold during late luteal phase (P < 0.05, n = 8 versus mid-luteal phase, n = 6). Collectively, these data demonstrate that (i) the extrinsic functional control (or rescue of CL in the event of pregnancy) occurs when the sensitivity towards LH/HCG is maximal; and (ii) the demise of CL function is mediated via an acquisition of sensitivity towards the intrinsic luteolytic signal, PGF2{alpha}, in the ageing CL.

corpus luteum/HCG/LH receptor/PGF2{alpha} receptor (FP)/progesterone

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Honkanen, S. Ranta, O. Ylikorkala, and O. Heikinheimo
The kinetics of serum hCG and progesterone in response to oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol during medical termination of early pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2315 - 2319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y.-L. Wu and M. C. Wiltbank
Transcriptional Regulation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene Changes from Protein Kinase (PK) A- to PKC-Dependence after Luteinization of Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2002; 66(5): 1505 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. O. Stocco, L. F. Lau, and G. Gibori
A Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent Activation of ERK1/2 Mediates JunD Phosphorylation and Induction of nur77 and 20alpha -hsd Genes by Prostaglandin F2alpha in Ovarian Cells
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2002; 277(5): 3293 - 3302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S.-J. Tsai, M.-H. Wu, P.-C. Chuang, and H.-M. Chen
Distinct regulation of gene expression by prostaglandin F2{{alpha}} (PGF2{{alpha}}) is associated with PGF2{{alpha}} resistance or susceptibility in human granulosa-luteal cells
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 7(5): 415 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
K. Hosokawa, U. Ottander, P. Wahlberg, T. Ny, S. Cajander, and I.J. Olofsson
Dominant expression and distribution of oestrogen receptor {beta} over oestrogen receptor {{alpha}} in the human corpus luteum
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 7(2): 137 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Runesson, K. Ivarsson, P. Olof Janson, and M. Brännström
Gonadotropin- and Cytokine-Regulated Expression of the Chemokine Interleukin 8 in the Human Preovulatory Follicle of the Menstrual Cycle
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2000; 85(11): 4387 - 4395.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F.M. Young, F.E. Rodger, P.J. Illingworth, and H.M. Fraser
Cell proliferation and vascular morphology in the marmoset corpus luteum
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 557 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
U. Ottander, K. Hosokawa, K. Liu, A. Bergh, T. Ny, and J. I. Olofsson
A Putative Stimulatory Role of Progesterone Acting via Progesterone Receptors in the Steroidogenic Cells of the Human Corpus Luteum
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2000; 62(3): 655 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.