Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 5, No. 7, 682-690,
July 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and sperm analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization for the most common reciprocal translocation t(11;22)
1 Centre for Medical Genetics and 2 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Free University of Brussels (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) Belgium, and 3 First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
In this study we describe the pre-clinical development and clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for two non-related carriers (one male and one female) of the most common balanced reciprocal translocation: t(11;22)(q25;q12). For the couple with the female carrier, enumeration of the sex chromosomes in the embryos was also indicated (husband: 47,XXY karyotype). Four-colour FISH analysis was performed on six blastomeres from three embryos. No embryo transfer was possible because all the embryos were unbalanced. Three PGD cycles, with two-colour FISH, were carried out for the couple with the male translocation carrier. A total of 35 embryos were biopsied and diagnosed by FISH; nine out of the 35 embryos (25.7%) were normal and seven of them were transferred (two embryos from the first and four from the third cycle), six out of 35 embryos (17%) were unbalanced, three out of 35 embryos (5.7%) were triploid or polyploid, 10 out of 35 embryos (28.6%) were mosaic and seven out of 35 embryos (20%) were chaotic. Diagnosis failed in 2.9% of the embryos. The spermatozoa of the male carrier were also analysed using three-colour FISH. Only 29.1% of the sperm cells seemed to be balanced or normal. By choosing probes lying on both sides of the breakpoints and by using a combination of sub-telomeric or locus-specific probes and centromeric probes, the use of three-colour FISH enabled detection of all the imbalances in sperm and/or cleavage-stage embryos in the patients. This may improve risk assessment and genetic counselling in the future for translocation carriers.
FISH/PGD/reciprocal translocation/sperm analysis
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Goossens, M. De Rycke, A. De Vos, C. Staessen, A. Michiels, W. Verpoest, A. Van Steirteghem, C. Bertrand, I. Liebaers, P. Devroey, et al. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 481 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vozdova, E. Oracova, V. Horinova, and J. Rubes Sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization study of meiotic segregation and an interchromosomal effect in carriers of t(11;18) Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 581 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Anton, F. Vidal, and J. Blanco Role of sperm FISH studies in the genetic reproductive advice of structural reorganization carriers Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2088 - 2092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Donoso, W. Verpoest, E.G. Papanikolaou, I. Liebaers, H.M. Fatemi, K. Sermon, C. Staessen, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1021 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Brugnon, E. Van Assche, G. Verheyen, B. Sion, D. Boucher, J.L. Pouly, L. Janny, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem Study of two markers of apoptosis and meiotic segregation in ejaculated sperm of chromosomal translocation carrier patients Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 685 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ogur, E. Van Assche, W. Vegetti, G. Verheyen, H. Tournaye, M. Bonduelle, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers Chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa of 14 Robertsonian translocation carriers Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 12(3): 209 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pinton, T. Faraut, M. Yerle, J. Gruand, F. Pellestor, and A. Ducos Comparison of male and female meiotic segregation patterns in translocation heterozygotes: a case study in an animal model (Sus scrofa domestica L.) Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2476 - 2482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Melotte, S. Debrock, T. D'Hooghe, J.P. Fryns, and J.R. Vermeesch Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for an insertional translocation carrier Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2777 - 2783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bonduelle, E. Van Assche, H. Joris, K. Keymolen, P. Devroey, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers Prenatal testing in ICSI pregnancies: incidence of chromosomal anomalies in 1586 karyotypes and relation to sperm parameters Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2600 - 2614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.N. Scriven, F.A. Flinter, P. R. Braude, and C. M. Ogilvie Robertsonian translocations--reproductive risks and indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2267 - 2273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium: data collection II (May 2000) Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2673 - 2683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Coonen, E. Martini, J. C.M. Dumoulin, H. T.M. Hollanders-Crombach, C. de Die-Smulders, J. P.M. Geraedts, A. H.N. Hopman, and J. L.H. Evers Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of a reciprocal translocation t(3;11)(q27.3;q24.3) in siblings Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 6(3): 199 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Vegetti, E. Van Assche, A. Frias, G. Verheyen, M. M. Bianchi, M. Bonduelle, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem Correlation between semen parameters and sperm aneuploidy rates investigated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in infertile men Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 351 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

