Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koks, C. A.M.
Right arrow Articles by Evers, J. L.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koks, C. A.M.
Right arrow Articles by Evers, J. L.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 6, No. 2, 170-177, February 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Uterus and pregnancy

Adhesion of menstrual endometrium to extracellular matrix: the possible role of integrin {alpha}6ß1 and laminin interaction

Carolien A.M. Koks1,2,4, Patrick G. Groothuis1, Gerard A.J. Dunselman1,2, Anton F.P.M. de Goeij1,3 and Johannes L.H. Evers1,2

1 Research Institute GROW, 2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 3 Department of Pathology, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht and Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Previous in-vitro studies have shown that the endometrium preferentially adheres to the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the amnion and peritoneum. This interaction probably involves adhesion molecules, e.g. integrins. We evaluated the expression of integrins in naturally shed menstrual endometrium and the adhesion pattern of this tissue to different components of the ECM. To identify integrins and matrix components involved, blocking studies were performed. Most of the 15 menstrual tissue samples showed positive staining for each of the integrins investigated, except {alpha}4ß1. Compared with binding to collagen IV, which was set at 100%, adhesion to collagen I was 93% (not significant), to fibronectin 87% (P < 0.05), and to laminin 74% (P < 0.05). Scanning electron micoscopy showed that endometrium adhered to laminin but hardly spread, whereas spreading was observed when layered on the other coatings. Compared with the control (which was set at 100%), incubation with 4B4, a monoclonal antibody against the integrin ß1 subunit, showed a significant reduction of adhesion (to ~50%; P < 0.05) when layered on laminin and a smaller reduction (to 82–86%; P < 0.05) when layered on the other three coatings. Incubation with antibody GOH3 against integrin {alpha}6ß1 resulted in a similar reduction in adhesion to laminin. Incubation with an RGD peptide significantly reduced adhesion (to 84%; P < 0.05) when plated on fibronectin. In conclusion, antegradely shed menstrual endometrium expresses various integrins. It shows preferential attachment to collagen IV and collagen I, when compared with fibronectin and laminin. Blockage of the integrin ß1 subunit resulted in greatest disruption to adhesion when layered on laminin, implying that the interaction was mediated by the {alpha}6ß1 integrin. Since this adhesion was not completely blocked, other mechanisms are likely to be involved.

blocking antibodies/cell culture/ectopic endometrium/menstruation/RGD peptide

Notes

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Joseph Ziekenhuis, P.O Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. A.B. Klemmt, J. G. Carver, P. Koninckx, E. J. McVeigh, and H. J. Mardon
Endometrial cells from women with endometriosis have increased adhesion and proliferative capacity in response to extracellular matrix components: towards a mechanistic model for endometriosis progression
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3139 - 3147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
M. Ulukus, H. Cakmak, and A. Arici
The Role of Endometrium in Endometriosis
Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2006; 13(7): 467 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
M. del Mar Vernet-Tomas, C. T. Perez-Ares, N. Verdu, M. T. Fernandez-Figueras, J. L. Molinero, and R. Carreras
The Depolarized Expression of the Alpha-6 Integrin Subunit in the Endometria of Women With Endometriosis
Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 2006; 13(4): 292 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Inagaki, M. Sugiura-Ogasawara, M. Nomizu, M. Nakatsuka, K. Ikuta, N. Suzuki, K. Kaihara, K. Kobayashi, T. Yasuda, Y. Shoenfeld, et al.
An association of IgG anti-laminin-1 autoantibodies with endometriosis in infertile patients
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 544 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W.P. Dmowski, J. Ding, J. Shen, N. Rana, B.B. Fernandez, and D.P. Braun
Apoptosis in endometrial glandular and stromal cells in women with and without endometriosis
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1802 - 1808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. A.J. Dunselman, P. G. Groothuis, A. F.P.M. de Goeij, and J. L.H. Evers
The Mesothelium, Teflon or Velcro?: Mesothelium in endometriosis pathogenesis
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 605 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.