Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 6, No. 9, 821-827,
September 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Uterine physiology |
Genetic abnormalities detected by comparative genomic hybridization in a human endometriosis-derived cell line
1 INSERM U507, Hôpital Necker, Paris, 2 Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, 3 Service de Cytogénétique, Hôpital St Vincent de Paul, Paris and 4 INSERM U184, IGBMC, Illkirch, France
Abstract
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used in parallel with fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and conventional karyotyping to perform a genome-wide survey of DNA gains and losses in the endometriosis-derived permanent cell line, FbEM-1. The cytogenetic analysis showed a complex karyotype with numerical changes and multiple chromosome aberrations, including the der(1) complement marker exhibiting a large homogenous staining region (HSR). The chromosomal rearrangement interpreted as der(5) t(5;6)(q34;p11) was found in the majority of the metaphases indicating a clonal abnormality. Repeated CGH experiments demonstrated over-representation of chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 5, 6p, 7, 16, 17q, 20, 21q and 22q, while chromosomes 6q, 9, 11p, 12, 13q, 18 and X were under-represented. Using DNA from the original endometriotic tissues, including a peritoneal implant and ovarian endometrioma, CGH analysis revealed loss of DNA copy number on 1p, 22q and chromosome X, while gain was found on chromosomal arms 6p and 17q. FISH analysis confirmed that the gain at 17q includes amplification of the proto-oncogene HER-2/neu in 16% of the FbEM-1 nuclei and in 12% of cells from the primary ovarian endometrioma tissue. These findings demonstrate that FbEM-1 cells share certain molecular cytogenetic features with the original tissue and suggest that chromosomal instability is important in the development of endometriosis.
cell line/comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)/cytogenetics/endometriosis/FISH
Notes
5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: INSERM U 507, Hôpital Necker, 161, Rue de Sevres, 75015-Paris, France. E-mail: gogusev{at}necker.fr
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W.-P. Hu, S. K. Tay, and Y. Zhao Endometriosis-Specific Genes Identified by Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Expression Profiling of Endometriosis Versus Autologous Uterine Endometrium J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 228 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Varma, T. Rollason, J. K Gupta, and E. R Maher Endometriosis and the neoplastic process Reproduction, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 293 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Lin, X. Zhang, and Y. Chen Mutagen sensitivity as a susceptibility marker for endometriosis Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2052 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gilabert-Estelles, A. Estelles, J. Gilabert, R. Castello, F. Espana, C. Falco, A. Romeu, M. Chirivella, E. Zorio, and J. Aznar Expression of several components of the plasminogen activator and matrix metalloproteinase systems in endometriosis Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1516 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Shridhar, J. Lee, A. Pandita, S. Iturria, R. Avula, J. Staub, M. Morrissey, E. Calhoun, A. Sen, K. Kalli, et al. Genetic Analysis of Early- versus Late-Stage Ovarian Tumors Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 61(15): 5895 - 5904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|