Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 7, No. 1, 27-34,
January 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Ovary and oogenesis |
Differential expression patterns of cathepsins B, H, K, L and S in the mouse ovary
1 Departments of Molecular Biology and Medical Biochemistry, and 2 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Turku University Central Hospital, University of Turku, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
Abstract
Cathepsins B, H, K, L and S belong to a family of lysosomal cysteine proteinases which participate in a variety of proteolytic processes, including degradation of extracellular matrix. Although the presence of cathepsin mRNAs in the ovary has been reported earlier, very little information is available on their temporospatial expression. In the present study, Northern analysis revealed cyclic changes in the mRNA levels for cathepsins B, H, K, L and S during the 4-day oestrous cycle in the mouse ovary. Immunohistochemical localization revealed distinct expression patterns suggesting different functions for the cathepsins studied. Cathepsin B was predominantly seen in the germinal epithelium throughout the oestrous cycle. Upon follicular maturation, an increasing number of granulosa cells became positive for all cathepsins. Strong cathepsin H staining was sharply defined in theca externa which also stained for cathepsins K and S. Corpus luteum was the predominant location of cathepsin L. The distribution of cathepsin S resembled that of cathepsin L. The developing oocyte stained positive for all cathepsins. In-situ hybridization confirmed the differential production of cathepsin mRNAs by granulosa, thecal and luteal cells. These complex temporal and spatial expression patterns at different stages of the oestrous cycle and follicular development suggest divergent functions for specific cathepsins in follicular development, growth and rupture.
cathepsin/extracellular matrix/mRNA/ovary
Notes
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Family Federation of Finland, Infertility Clinic of Turku, Maariankatu 3a, FIN-20100 Turku, Finland. E-mail: marja-leena.anttila{at}vaestoliitto.fi
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.J. Ireland, A.E. Zielak-Steciwko, F. Jimenez-Krassel, J. Folger, A. Bettegowda, D. Scheetz, S. Walsh, F. Mossa, P.G. Knight, G.W. Smith, et al. Variation in the Ovarian Reserve Is Linked to Alterations in Intrafollicular Estradiol Production and Ovarian Biomarkers of Follicular Differentiation and Oocyte Quality in Cattle Biol Reprod, May 1, 2009; 80(5): 954 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bettegowda, O. V. Patel, K.-B. Lee, K.-E. Park, M. Salem, J. Yao, J. J. Ireland, and G. W. Smith Identification of Novel Bovine Cumulus Cell Molecular Markers Predictive of Oocyte Competence: Functional and Diagnostic Implications Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 301 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gava, C. L. Clarke, C. Bye, K. Byth, and A. deFazio Global gene expression profiles of ovarian surface epithelial cells in vivo J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 40(6): 281 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sriraman, U. Eichenlaub-Ritter, J. W. Bartsch, A. Rittger, S. M. Mulders, and J. S. Richards Regulated Expression of ADAM8 (a Disintegrin and Metalloprotease Domain 8) in the Mouse Ovary: Evidence for a Regulatory Role of Luteinizing Hormone, Progesterone Receptor, and Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factors Biol Reprod, June 1, 2008; 78(6): 1038 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Erdmann, A. Ricken, C. Merkwitz, I. Struman, R. Castino, K. Hummitzsch, F. Gaunitz, C. Isidoro, J. Martial, and K. Spanel-Borowski The expression of prolactin and its cathepsin D-mediated cleavage in the bovine corpus luteum vary with the estrous cycle Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1365 - E1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hashmi, J. Zhang, Y. Oksov, Q. Ji, and S. Lustigman The Caenorhabditis elegans CPI-2a Cystatin-like Inhibitor Has an Essential Regulatory Role during Oogenesis and Fertilization J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 28415 - 28429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Assou, T. Anahory, V. Pantesco, T. Le Carrour, F. Pellestor, B. Klein, L. Reyftmann, H. Dechaud, J. De Vos, and S. Hamamah The human cumulus-oocyte complex gene-expression profile Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1705 - 1719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. von Schalburg, M. L. Rise, G. D. Brown, W. S. Davidson, and B. F. Koop A Comprehensive Survey of the Genes Involved in Maturation and Development of the Rainbow Trout Ovary Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 687 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. McRae, H. M. Johnston, M. Mihm, and P. J. O'Shaughnessy Changes in Mouse Granulosa Cell Gene Expression during Early Luteinization Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 309 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wu, K. H. Van der Hoek, N. K. Ryan, R. J. Norman, and R. L. Robker Macrophage contributions to ovarian function Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2004; 10(2): 119 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sriraman and J. S. Richards Cathepsin L Gene Expression and Promoter Activation in Rodent Granulosa Cells Endocrinology, February 1, 2004; 145(2): 582 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Oksjoki, O. Rahkonen, M. Haarala, E. Vuorio, and L. Anttila Differences in connective tissue gene expression between normally functioning, polycystic and post-menopausal ovaries Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 10(1): 7 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Waters, S. Safe, and K. W. Gaido Differential Gene Expression in Response to Methoxychlor and Estradiol through ER{alpha}, ER{beta}, and AR in Reproductive Tissues of Female Mice Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2001; 63(1): 47 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Jokimaa, S. Oksjoki, H. Kujari, E. Vuorio, and L. Anttila Expression patterns of cathepsins B, H, K, L and S in the human endometrium Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 73 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||








