Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morel, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bresson, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morel, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bresson, J.-L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 7, No. 5, 483-488, May 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Reproductive genetics

FISH analysis of the chromosomal status of spermatozoa from three men with 45,XY,der(13;14)(q10;q10) karyotype

Frédéric Morel, Christophe Roux1 and Jean-Luc Bresson

Service de Cytogénétique-Immunocytologie-Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction, CECOS Besançon, Franche-Comté, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Jacques, EA3185: génétique et Reproduction, 25030 Besançon, France

Abstract

Meiotic segregation of chromosomes 13 and 14 was studied in the ejaculated spermatozoa of three men carrying a translocation der(13;14)(q10;q10). The spermatozoa of these patients and of a donor with a normal 46,XY karyotype (control) were analysed by two-colour fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) with specific chromosomal painting of chromosomes 13 and 14, by two-colour FISH detecting chromosomes 18 and 21 and by triple-colour FISH for chromosomes X, Y and 8. For patients 1, 2 and 3, respectively, 81.34, 82.60 and 88.90% of the analysed nuclei showed normal or balanced chromosomal status, resulting from the alternate segregation of the translocation. The rates of spermatozoa with an unbalanced status (disomy and nullisomy, 13 or 14) resulting from the adjacent mode of segregation were estimated respectively at 18.06, 16.32 and 10.80 (for patients 1, 2 and 3). Additional colour FISH analysis with probes specific for chromosomes X, Y, 8, 18 and 21 showed a significant increase in some disomy frequencies (8, 18, 21, X and Y for patient 1, only 18 for patient 2) in comparison with the control. These results would seem to indicate an interchromosomal effect.

fluorescence in-situ hybridization/interchromosomal effect/meiotic segregation/spermatozoa/13;14 translocation

Notes

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: christophe.roux{at}ufc_chu.univ_fcomte.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R.H. Martin
Cytogenetic determinants of male fertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, June 4, 2008; (2008) dmn017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Anton, F. Vidal, and J. Blanco
Role of sperm FISH studies in the genetic reproductive advice of structural reorganization carriers
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2088 - 2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Moradkhani, J. Puechberty, S. Bhatt, J. Lespinasse, P. Vago, G. Lefort, P. Sarda, S. Hamamah, and F. Pellestor
Rare Robertsonian translocations and meiotic behaviour: sperm FISH analysis of t(13;15) and t(14;15) translocations: A Case Report
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3193 - 3198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Moradkhani, J. Puechberty, S. Bhatt, P. Vago, L. Janny, G. Lefort, S. Hamamah, P. Sarda, and F. Pellestor
Meiotic segregation of rare Robertsonian translocations: sperm analysis of three t(14q;22q) cases
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1166 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Hatakeyama, H. Gao, K. Harmer, and S. Ma
Meiotic segregation patterns and ICSI pregnancy outcome of a rare (13;21) Robertsonian translocation carrier: a case report
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 976 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
G. Ogur, E. Van Assche, W. Vegetti, G. Verheyen, H. Tournaye, M. Bonduelle, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers
Chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa of 14 Robertsonian translocation carriers
Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 12(3): 209 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Baccetti, G. Collodel, R. Marzella, E. Moretti, P. Piomboni, G. Scapigliati, and F. Serafini
Ultrastructural studies of spermatozoa from infertile males with Robertsonian translocations and 18, X, Y aneuploidies
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2295 - 2300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Anahory, S. Hamamah, B. Andreo, B. Hedon, M. Claustres, P. Sarda, and F. Pellestor
Sperm segregation analysis of a (13;22) Robertsonian translocation carrier by FISH: a comparison of locus-specific probe and whole chromosome painting
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1850 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Anton, J. Blanco, J. Egozcue, and F. Vidal
Sperm FISH studies in seven male carriers of Robertsonian translocation t(13;14)(q10;q10)
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1345 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, S. Munne, B. Balicchia, T. Escudero, and A. Crippa
Possible interchromosomal effect in embryos generated by gametes from translocation carriers
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3201 - 3207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Frydman, S. Romana, M. Le Lorc'h, M. Vekemans, R. Frydman, and G. Tachdjian
Assisting reproduction of infertile men carrying a Robertsonian translocation
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2274 - 2277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.