Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (58)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandalinas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Munné, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandalinas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Munné, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 8, No. 6, 580-585, June 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Reproductive genetics

Spectral karyotyping of fresh, non-inseminated oocytes

Mireia Sandalinas, Carmen Márquez and Santiago Munné,1

The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of Saint Barnabas, 101 Old Short Hills Road, Suite 501, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA

The object of this study was to determine the mechanisms producing aneuploidy in female meiosis I by analysing the whole chromosome complement of human non-inseminated and unfertilized fresh oocytes. For this purpose, 131 fresh oocytes were obtained from 16 oocyte donors (24–48 years old). These oocytes were fixed immediately after retrieval and 47 good quality metaphases from 13 donors were analysed by spectral karyotyping to identify all 23 chromosome types. The data was divided into two maternal age groups, 24–34 (n = 31) and 35 years (n = 16). More non-disjunction (13 and 25%), unbalanced predivision (10 and 44%, P < 0.01) and balanced predivision (6 and 62%, P < 0.001) events were found in the older group of oocytes. There was an increase in balanced predivision with decreasing chromosome size (P < 0.001). The present results are the first obtained in fresh oocytes where all chromosomes were specifically identified, and support previous theories that predivision of chromatids is a major factor causing aneuploidy. Previous reports with inseminated, non-fertilized oocytes fixed 24 h after retrieval suffered from artefactual predivision of chromatids triggered by in-vitro ageing of oocytes.

aneuploidy/balanced predivision/PGD/preimplantation genetic diagnosis/trisomy 21

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: santi.munne{at}embryos.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Garcia-Cruz, A. Casanovas, M. Brieno-Enriquez, P. Robles, I. Roig, A. Pujol, L. Cabero, M. Durban, and M. Garcia Caldes
Cytogenetic analyses of human oocytes provide new data on non-disjunction mechanisms and the origin of trisomy 16
Hum. Reprod., October 14, 2009; (2009) dep347v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
D. Wells, S. Alfarawati, and E. Fragouli
Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH
Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 14(12): 703 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Cukurcam, I. Betzendahl, G. Michel, E. Vogt, C. Hegele-Hartung, B. Lindenthal, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Influence of follicular fluid meiosis-activating sterol on aneuploidy rate and precocious chromatid segregation in aged mouse oocytes
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 815 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Rosenbusch
The contradictory information on the distribution of non-disjunction and pre-division in female gametes
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2739 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Fragouli, D. Wells, A. Thornhill, P. Serhal, M.J.W. Faed, J.C. Harper, and J.D.A. Delhanty
Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2319 - 2328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gutierrez-Mateo, J. Benet, H. Starke, M. Oliver-Bonet, S. Munne, T. Liehr, and J. Navarro
Karyotyping of human oocytes by cenM-FISH, a new 24-colour centromere-specific technique
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3395 - 3401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gutierrez-Mateo, L. Gadea, J. Benet, D. Wells, S. Munne, and J. Navarro
Aneuploidy 12 in a Robertsonian (13;14) carrier: Case report
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1256 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
H.-U. G. Weier, J. F. Weier, M. O. Renom, X. Zheng, P. Colls, A. Nureddin, C. D. Pham, L. W. Chu, C. Racowsky, and S. Munne
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Spectral Imaging Analysis of Human Oocytes and First Polar Bodies
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2005; 53(3): 269 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
H. A. Homer, A. McDougall, M. Levasseur, K. Yallop, A. P. Murdoch, and M. Herbert
Mad2 prevents aneuploidy and premature proteolysis of cyclin B and securin during meiosis I in mouse oocytes
Genes & Dev., January 15, 2005; 19(2): 202 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. Pellestor, T. Anahory, and S. Hamamah
The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 15 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gutierrez-Mateo, J. Benet, D. Wells, P. Colls, M.G. Bermudez, J.F. Sanchez-Garcia, J. Egozcue, J. Navarro, and S. Munne
Aneuploidy study of human oocytes first polar body comparative genomic hybridization and metaphase II fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2859 - 2868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gutierrez-Mateo, D. Wells, J. Benet, J. F. Sanchez-Garcia, M. G. Bermudez, I. Belil, J. Egozcue, S. Munne, and J. Navarro
Reliability of comparative genomic hybridization to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2118 - 2125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Diagnosis and management of the infertile couple: missing information
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 295 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.-U. Chen, C.-Y. Chang, C.-C. Lu, F.-J. Hsieh, H.-N. Ho, and Y.-S. Yang
Microtubular spindle dynamics and chromosome complements from somatic cell nuclei haploidization in mature mouse oocytes and developmental potential of the derived embryos
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1181 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
F. Sun, I. Betzendahl, Y. Shen, R. Cortvrindt, J. Smitz, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Preantral follicle culture as a novel in vitro assay in reproductive toxicology testing in mammalian oocytes
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 13 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
T. Anahory, B. Andreo, G. Regnier-Vigouroux, J.P. Soulie, M. Baudouin, J. Demaille, and F. Pellestor
Sequential multiple probe fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies by combining centromeric labelling and whole chromosome painting
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 9(10): 577 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Cukurcam, C. Hegele-Hartung, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Meiosis-activating sterol protects oocytes from precocious chromosome segregation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1908 - 1917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Reproductive semi-cloning respecting biparental origin: Reconstitution of gametes for assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 473 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.