Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 7, No. 8, 791-796,
August 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Appendix |
The COPE Report 1999. Guidelines on good publication practice*
Committee on Publication Ethics
1. Study design and ethical approval
Definition
Good research should be well justified, well planned, appropriately designed and ethically approved. To conduct research to a lower standard may constitute misconduct.
Action
- Laboratory and clinical research should be driven by protocol; pilot studies should have a written rationale.
- Research protocols should seek to answer specific questions, rather than just collect data.
- Protocols must be carefully agreed by all contributors and collaborators, including, if appropriate, the participants.
- The final protocol should form part of the research record.
- Early agreement on the precise roles of the contributors and collaborators, and on matters of authorship and publication, is advised.
- Statistical issues should be considered early in study design, including power calculations, to ensure there are neither too few nor too many participants.
- Formal and documental ethical approval from an appropriately constituted research ethics committee is required for all studies involving people, medical records and anonymized human tissues.
- Use of human tissues in
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
Definition
Action
3. Authorship
Definition
Action
4. Conflicts of interest
Definition
Action
5. Peer review
Definition
Action
6. Redundant publication
Definition
Action
7. Plagiarism
Definition
Action
8. Duties of editors
Definition
Action
9. Media relations
Definition
Action
10. Advertising
Definition
Action
11. Dealing with misconduct
Principles
Investigating misconduct
Serious misconduct
Less serious misconduct
Sanctions