Skip Navigation


Mol. Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on December 10, 2004
Molecular Human Reproduction 2005 11(2):133-140; doi:10.1093/molehr/gah137
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/2/133    most recent
gah137v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dadoune, J.P.
Right arrow Articles by Siffroi, J.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dadoune, J.P.
Right arrow Articles by Siffroi, J.P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction vol. 11 no. 2 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

Identification of transcripts by macroarrays, RT–PCR and in situ hybridization in human ejaculate spermatozoa

J.P. Dadoune1,2,4, A. Pawlak3, M.F. Alfonsi1 and J.P. Siffroi1,2

1Laboratoire de Cytologie et Histologie, Centre Universitaire des Saints-Pères, 75270, Paris, 2EA 1533 Génétique de la Reproduction Humaine, Hôpital Tenon (AP-HP), 75970, Paris and 3Unité INSERM 581, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, 94010 Créteil, Paris, France

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Laboratoire de Cytologie et Histologie, Centre Universitaire des Saints-Pères, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France. Email: jean-pierre.dadoune{at}univ-paris5.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Round spermatids contain high levels of extremely varied mRNAs that are synthesized either throughout early spermatogenesis or during spermiogenesis from the haploid genome. Concomitantly, with major changes in the chromatin organization, arrest of transcription occurs at midspermiogenesis. However, previous investigations using RT–PCR have revealed the persistence of numerous and different transcripts in ejaculated spermatozoa. In the present study, a step-by-step analysis by means of macroarray hybridization, RT–PCR and in situ hybridization was performed to identify more accurately the different mRNA species found in the human ejaculated spermatozoa. The data showed an extended pattern of various transcripts encoding a diverse range of proteins involved in signal transduction and cell proliferation. For the first time, they demonstrated that mRNAs coding for the transcription factors NF{kappa}B, HOX2A, ICSBP, protein kinase JNK2, growth factor HBEGF and receptors RXRß and ErbB3 accumulate within the sperm nucleus. The origin and fate of the sperm transcripts remain subject to discussion.

Key words: haploid genome/messenger RNAs/spermatozoa


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In mammals, round spermatids contain a number of transcripts that are produced either throughout early spermatogenesis (Eddy, 2002Go) or during spermiogenesis from the haploid genes coding for sperm-specific proteins such as transition proteins and protamines (Steger, 1999Go) or sperm tail cytoskeletal proteins implied in the molecular make-up of the outer dense fibres (Petersen et al., 1999Go) and fibrous sheath (Eddy et al., 2003Go). The arrest of transcription that is concomitant with major changes in the chromatin organization occurs during midspermiogenesis (Dadoune, 2003Go). However, the presence of extremely varied transcripts in mature sperm cells has been described in both rodents (Pessot et al., 1989Go; Passananti et al., 1995Go; Levallet et al., 1998Go) and man (Kumar et al., 1993Go; Chiang et al., 1994Go; Miller et al., 1994Go; Rohwedder et al., 1996Go; Kramer and Krawetz, 1997Go; Wykes et al., 1997Go; Miller et al., 1999Go; Richter et al., 1999Go; Goodwin et al., 2000aGo,bGo; Miller, 2000Go; Sachdeva et al., 2000Go; Carreau et al., 2001Go; Siffroi and Dadoune, 2001Go; Aquila et al., 2002Go; Lin et al., 2002Go; Luconi et al., 2002Go; Ostermeier et al., 2002Go; Wong et al., 2002Go; Com et al., 2003Go; Park et al., 2003Go; Lambard et al., 2004Go). Most investigations on RNA identification in mature spermatozoa have been performed with techniques based on the detection of specific or particular sets of RNAs by means of PCR after reverse transcription (RT–PCR). Attempts, using differential RNA fingerprinting following anchor-primed RT–PCR, have previously been made to characterize the diverse transcripts present in human spermatozoa (Miller et al., 1994Go). More recently, microarray technology has been employed for a large-scale analysis of complementary DNAs prepared from spermatozoan RNA by RT–PCR. This method has allowed the rapid detection of thousands of transcripts in human sperm cells (Ostermeier et al., 2002Go). Nevertheless, RNA extracted from ejaculated spermatozoa may be exposed to low levels of somatic contaminants, despite purification of semen samples. Consequently, the verification of PCR results by in situ hybridization (ISH), using either riboprobes (Kumar et al., 1993Go; Wykes et al., 1997Go) or labelled antisense oligonucleotides (Siffroi and Dadoune, 2001Go), is recommended to establish the unquestionable spermatic origin of the transcripts detected by PCR. ISH also permits bypassing another problem raised by the high sensitivity of PCR. Indeed, nested RT–PCR of RNAs from a single spermatozoon has shown apparently aberrant transcripts in human sperm cells like those coding for synapsin 1, immunoglobulins or T cell receptor {alpha} (Kimoto, 1998Go). Such a phenomenon, named illegitimate transcription, has been defined as a very low-level transcription of any gene in any cell type (Chelly et al., 1989Go). In this respect, some transcripts accumulated in the sperm nucleus would not have any functional meaning in the male germ cell line. Thus, the questions raised by the sensitivity of detection methods prompted us to further identify the different mRNA species found in human ejaculated spermatozoa by carrying out a step-by-step analysis with macroarray hybridization, RT–PCR and ISH. The results showed an extended pattern of various transcripts encoding factors essential for cellular functioning and, for the first time, demonstrated the presence of the NF{kappa}B, HOX2A, ICSBP, JNK2, HBEGF, RXRß and ErbB3 transcripts in human sperm nuclei.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Preparation of spermatozoa
Semen samples were collected from 20 healthy voluntary donors, after 3–5 days of sexual abstinence. A complete semen analysis was performed on each sample using the World Health Organization guidelines (1999Go). The sperm concentration was >20 x 106/ml, with motility >65% and containing <1% immature germ cells and lymphocytes. At least, 30% of the spermatozoa had a normal morphological appearance. Samples from 3 to 5 donors were pooled for further treatments. Following liquefaction at 37°C, motile spermatozoa were selected by density gradient centrifugation. Two millilitres of semen were layered on top of a 45–90% discontinuous gradient of isotonic PureSperm 100 (Nidacon, Gothenburg, Sweden) diluted with FertiCult IVF mediumTM (FertiPro N.V., Beernem, Belgium). After centrifugation (20 min at 400 g), the pellets were resuspended in 0.25 ml of BM1 medium (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France) and the purity of the selected spermatozoa population was checked under a light microscope. For some samples, the sperm heads were separated from the sperm tails by sonication (4 x 6 min) at the maximal power of a Labsonic U sonicator (Biotech. International, Melsungen, Germany). Sperm heads were recovered by centrifugation at 400 g and resuspended in BM1 medium. Sperm smears were prepared with 20 µl of the cell suspension per slide using VectabondTM silane-coated slides (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). The smears were fixed in methanol–acetic acid (3/1) for 5 min, rinsed briefly in distilled sterile water, air-dried and then stored at –20°C until used.

RNA extraction
Total RNA was extracted from the entire spermatozoa and the sperm heads using the TRIZol solutions (Invitrogen SARL, France), following the manufacturer's instructions. The final RNA concentration was measured on a GeneQuant II spectrophotometer (Pharmacia biotech, UK).

Macroarray hybridization
Two micrograms of RNA were treated for 30 min at 37°C with 10 units of RQ1-DNase, RNase Free (Promega, WI, USA) in the presence of 40 units of RNasin (Promega, WI, USA). The RNA was then extracted using phenol/chloroform and precipitated by ethanol. The pellet was washed with 75% ethanol and dried. The dried RNA was resuspended in 4 µl of sterile water. Two microlitres of RQ1-DNase treated RNA were used to synthesize the 32PdATP labelled probe following the supplier's instructions (BD Biosciences Clontech, CA, USA). The AtlasTM Human cDNA Expression Array membranes (BD Biosciences Clontech, CA, USA) were hybridized overnight and washed as described in the user's manual. After the last washing step, the membranes were sealed in Saran wraps and exposed for 1 week to a detection screen (Molecular Dynamics, CA, USA). The screen was then analysed using a Storm 840 phosphorImager and the ImageQuant program (Molecular Dynamics, CA, USA). The complete list of the cDNAs and controls immobilized on the membrane is available on Clontech's website (www.bdbiosciences.com/clontech/atlas/genelists/index.shtml).

RT–PCR analysis
Two micrograms of RQ1-DNase treated spermatozoa RNA were used in a final volume of 50 µl for reverse transcriptase reactions. Briefly, the RNA was incubated for 10 min at 70°C in 20 µl of sterile water containing 0.4 mM of oligodT18–22. The RNA/oligodT solution was shielded on ice before the addition of AMV reverse transcriptase buffer (50 mM tris–HCl pH 8.3, 6 mM MgCl2, 40 mM KCl, 4 mM DDT), dNTPs (0.2 mM of each), RNasine (20 units) and 40 units of AMV reverse transcriptase (Finnzyme, Finland). The reaction mixture was incubated for 1 h at 48°C, extracted using phenol/chloroform and precipitated by ethanol. The cDNA pellet was washed with 75% ethanol, dried and resuspended in water at a final concentration of 10 ng/µl. The equivalent of 50 ng of cDNA were used in the PCR reaction under the following conditions: 5' and 3'specific oligonucleotide primers (0.3 µmoles of each), DyNAzymeTM EXT optimized buffer (1x final containing 1.5 mM MgCl2), dNTP (200 µM final each), dimethylsulphoxide (5% final), and 1 unit of enzyme DyNAzymeTM EXT DNA polymerase (Finnzyme). The PCR protocol consisted of a 2 min denaturation step at 94°C followed by 40 cycles of a denaturation step at 94°C for 30 s, an annealing step at 57°C for 30 s. and an elongation step at 72°C for 1 min. The reaction was ended by a 10 min step at 68°C and the samples were stored at 4°C until analysis. For analysis, the products of the reaction, separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel, were blotted on a Hybond N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences, France), which was hybridized with [32P] labelled oligonucleotides (2x107 cpm) specific for each selected RNA. The sequence of the specific PCR primers and the corresponding detection primers used in this study are listed in Table I.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Description and sequence of the oligonucleotides used in this study. For interferon consensus sequence-binding protein (ICSBP), two 5' PCR primers were used referred to as (1) and (2). The expected size of the amplification products are labelled (1) and (2), respectively

 
In situ hybridization
Specific oligonucleotides for each selected RNA were labelled using terminal transferase and DIG-dUTP as described by the supplier (Roche Applied Science, Germany). The probes were quantified and the labelling efficiency estimated using the DIG Teststrips (Roche Applied Science, Germany). Finally, the probes were kept at –20°C until use.

Before hybridization, sperm head decondensation was performed by treating slides with 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8, 10 mM dithiothreitol (Sigma–Aldrich Chimie SARL, France) for 30 min at room temperature followed by a 3 h incubation in 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8, 10 mM 3,5-diiodosalicylic acid (LIS, Sigma–Aldrich Chimie SARL, France). The slides were then washed twice in 2 x SSC (1 x SSC: 150 mM NaCl, 15 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0), dried and prehybridized for 2 h at 37°C in a solution of 1 x Denhardt (0.02% Ficoll, 0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.02% bovine serum albumin), 1.5 x SSC and 4% deionized formamide containing 110 µg/ml tRNA and 20 µg/ml heat denatured Salmon Sperm DNA (SSDna). After a two-step wash, 1 h at 37°C in 2 x SSC and 1 h in 1 x SSC at room temperature, the slides were treated for immunodetection using the DIG Nucleic Acid Detection Kit (Roche Applied Science, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To enrich for motile spermatozoa and remove somatic contaminants, the pooled samples were purified by centrifugation through a discontinuous gradient of PureSperm. As shown in Figure 1a, no somatic contamination became visible in the pellets resuspended in the BM1 medium. All the selected spermatozoa exhibited normal morphological features. After DTT treatment, which allows a better accessibility to the probes used for ISH, sperm cells display moderately uncondensed nuclei (Figure 1b).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Smears of purified human sperm cells stained with haematoxylin-eosin before (a) and after (b) head decondensation (x600).

 
Two identical expression array membranes contained in the kit were hybridized with two independently prepared sperm-specific probes. A representative result obtained on a membrane is presented in Figure 2aFigure 2a. The signals obtained on the two membranes were similar in strength (Figure 2b). Analysis of the hybridization signals indicated the presence of a large variety of RNAs in the spermatozoa. The D region of the membrane, in which the sequences corresponding to the transcription factors and the regulators are located, exhibits signals stronger than those from the other regions. The region with the lowest signal is the A region corresponding to the oncogenes and the tumour suppressor sequences. The 20 strongest signals classified by decreasing signal strengths are listed in Table II. From this list, the three most abundant signals correspond, respectively, to the 90 kDa heat-shock protein A (Hsp86), the heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HBEGF) and the interferon consensus sequence-binding protein (ICSBP). Similar results were obtained from entire spermatozoa and sperm heads collected after sonication (data not shown).



View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Representative macroarray hybridization result. The membrane is divided into six regions (A to F). Each sequence corresponding to a specific RNA is spotted twice: 1–7 and a to n are the co-ordinates of each duplicate in the different regions. The squares indicate the mRNAs selected for RT–PCR and in situ experiments (a). Identical results were obtained on a second membrane whose upper part is shown as an example (b).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. List of the mRNAs corresponding to the 20 strongest signals on the macroarray hybridization membranes. The signal level is a subjective value from the observation of four hybridization results

 
For RT–PCR analysis, we choose 16 RNA sequences including the three previously mentioned strongest signals, two negative hybridization signals for the RNAs coding for deoxyribonuclease I-like protein 1 (XIB) (coordinates C7n) and glucagon (coordinates F7f), respectively, and finally 11 randomly chosen sequences exhibiting various degrees of hybridization signal. These RNAs are listed in Table I. To check the quality of the reverse transcriptase reaction, we performed, at first, a PCR reaction using specific oligonucleotides for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as positive control (Lin et al., 2002Go; Ohmura et al., 1999Go). The amplified products were separated on agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining under UV light (Figure 3a). Two of the five samples tested gave a low amount of amplified products for GAPDH. These samples were discarded from the study and we pooled the samples 1–3 for the PCR reactions with the selected RNA sequence-specific primers. Four additional pools of the samples were treated independently in the same conditions. A typical pattern of the amplification products detected by hybridization with specific labelled oligonucleotides is shown in Figure 3b. The strongest signals detected on each tested sample correspond to the GAPDH, HBEGF, HSP90 and c-Myc transcripts. Due to the heterogeneous quality of the extracted samples, RXRß, HOX2A, NF{kappa}B1 and JNK2 amplification products were detected in three samples out of five whereas RAB4 was detected only in one sample. No specific signal was detected for all the other oligonucleotides tested. The correlation between macroarray hybridization signals and RT–PCR blots was good for most of the specific mRNAs tested except for ICSBP. The latter, in spite of a strong macroarray signal, did not show any specific RT–PCR signal while c-Myc showed a very low signal on macroarray membranes and a strong RT–PCR signal. The comparison of the ICSBP sequence with the EST database indicated that the 5' oligonucleotide designed for RT–PCR was located in a region that is deleted by splicing at least in Jurkat cells (human leukaemic T lymphocytes). Consequently, we designed a new 5' oligonucleotide that allowed the detection of a strong specific amplification product for ICSBP at the right size (164 bp) in all tested samples (Figure 3c).



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. RT–PCR experiments. (a) The quality of the sperm RNA samples was estimated by RT–PCR reaction using specific oligonucleotides corresponding to GAPDH and the result was visualized by migrating the PCR products on agarose gel and staining with ethidium bromide. S1 to S5 represent five independent sperm RNA samples; L1 and L2 are control liver RNA samples; NC is a negative control without reverse transcriptase; M represents the molecular weight marker. (b) The selected RNA samples were then submitted to RT–PCR reaction for the selected RNA sequences (Table I). The results were visualized after migration on agarose gel, transfer to a nylon membrane and hybridization with 32P-labelled oligonucleotides specific for each selected RNA. (c) RT–PCR results on three independent sperm RNA samples using the two different 5' oligonucleotides specific for ICSBP. Respectively, oligonucleotide (1) for line 2,4 and 6; oligonucleotide (2) for line 1, 3 and 5. GAPDH was used as a control reaction.

 
ISH analysis was made to assess whether the nine transcripts detected by RT–PCR with a wide range of hybridization signal strengths (Figure 3b) were present in mature spermatozoa. As shown in Figure 4, all spermatozoa display a similar distribution of the RXRß, JNK2, HOX2A, ErbB3, NF{kappa}B, c-Myc and HBEGF transcripts, localized specifically within the entire head region. The presence of ICSBP detected by RT–PCR using a new 5' oligonucleotide (Figure 3c) was confirmed by ISH results. The reaction intensity of the eight transcripts was comparable to that for GAPDH used as control.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. ISH on entire spermatozoa with decondensed heads showing a positive reaction for the RXRß (a), JNK2 (b), HOX2A (c), ErbB3 (d), NF{kappa}B (e), c-Myc (f), HBEGF (g), ICSBP (h) and GAPDH (i) transcripts. mRNAs were hybridized with digoxigenin labelled-probes which were immunodetected by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG antibody and, then, revealed using nitroblue tetrazolium salt/bromo-chloro-indoyl-phosphatase (NBT/BCIP) as a substrate. Controls with the corresponding labelled sense oligonucleotides are seen in the insets (x600).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The data provided by hybridization of the Atlas Human cDNA expression array membranes indicated that a large number of RNAs are present in ejaculated spermatozoa. In addition to observations based on the amplification of the targeted mRNA species (Table III), recent investigations using a conventional screening strategy (Miller et al., 1999Go) or microarray technology (Ostermeier et al., 2002Go) have shown that most spermatozoan RNAs encode a diverse range of proteins participating in signal transduction, oncogenesis and cell proliferation. Our results are in accordance with previous findings, even when macroarray hybridization signals were not strong. For example, c-Myc and N-cadherin that give very low hybridization signals on the membrane were previously detected in spermatozoa by RT–PCR and/or in situ hybridization (Kumar et al., 1993Go; Goodwin et al., 2000aGo). However, it is noteworthy that the region of the membrane containing the transcription factors and regulators (region D) exhibits the largest number of signals. The significance of this finding remains to be elucidated. In addition, our macroarray hybridization data revealed that the three most represented mRNAs in human spermatozoa are HSP90, HBEGF and ICSBP. The well-detected HSP90 mRNA has already been identified in human spermatozoa (Miller et al., 1999Go; Miller, 2000Go). HSP90 is an abundant and highly conserved molecular chaperone with a large conformational flexibility that allows it to assist a wide range of substrates (Picard, 2002Go). As a component of the hetero-oligomeric structure of steroid receptors, it would act as a positive and negative modulator of the steroid receptor function (Catelli et al., 1999Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Identification of the mRNAs present in human ejaculated spermatozoa following RT–PCR and/or ISH

 
The presence of the HBEGF transcript and the ICSBP transcript variant, described for the first time in human sperm cells, is demonstrated by our RT–PCR and ISH results. HBEGF is one of the major ligands for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that belongs to the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases (Anderson et al., 2004Go). It is thought to be involved in preimplantation embryo development and implantation (Leach et al., 1999Go; Tamada et al., 1999Go; Armant et al., 2000Go). Until now, its production by the testis has not been established. The ICSBP mRNA detected in human spermatozoa is a spliced variant that is deleted at least at exon 7. ICSBP has been identified as a transcription factor of the interferon (IFN) regulatory factor family (IRF), which regulates the IFN-inducible gene expression and which would participate in the regulation proliferation and differentiation of the haematopoietic progenitor cells (Schmidt et al. 1998Go). Both type I and type II IFNs are expressed in the seminiferous tubules (Dejucq et al., 1995Go). Thus, it can be hypothesized that these cytokines act on IFN-inducible genes in male germ cells through a transcription factor which is a truncated protein translated from the ICSBP transcript variant.

Two other new mRNAs encoding transcription factors have been found in the sperm nucleus. The HOX2A mRNA is transcribed from the HOX2A gene (human homeobox HOXB5) that is located on the human chromosome 17 (Galang and Hauser, 1992Go). HOX homeobox genes display a pattern of expression in the testis, suggesting a role in spermatogenesis (Lindsey and Wilkinson, 1996Go). The NF{kappa}B mRNA codes for a NF{kappa}B protein that belongs to the Rel/nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B family of transcription factors. Nuclear NF{kappa}B activity has been detected in murine spermatocytes and spermatids, leading to the hypothesis that NF{kappa}B factors may play a role during the development of sperm cells (Delfino and Walker, 1998Go; Lilienbaum et al., 2000Go). In addition to transcription factor mRNAs, transcription factor proteins such as Oct-1, Oct-4, Ets-1, CEBP and TBP have been localized by immunofluorescence in the chromatin of mouse spermatozoa, questioning the role of these proteins after fertilization (Pittoggi et al., 2001Go).

Finally, altogether, our RT–PCR and ISH data have shown the localization of the JNK2, RXRß, and ErbB3 transcripts within the human sperm head. JNK2 (c-Jun N-terminal kinase 2) is a member of the MAP kinase group. After activation by dual phosphorylation on tyrosine and threonine residues, it phosphorylates the transcription factors c-Jun, ATF-2 and Elk-1 (Gupta et al., 1996Go). It is well known that the nuclear transcription factor c-Jun is expressed during the premeiotic and the meiotic steps of spermatogenesis (Muller et al., 1982Go). The RXRß and ErbB3 mRNAs code for the nuclear retinoid X receptor ß (RXRß) and for a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R or ErbB) family, respectively. RXRß was immunolocalized in A spermatogonia, pachytene spermatocytes and spermatids in adult mice (Gaemers et al., 1998Go) and in rat gonocytes during a short neonatal period (Boulogne et al., 1999Go), suggesting that retinoids act on the male germ cell development. The epidermal growth factor superfamily of peptide growth factors (EGF-GFs) is implicated in the spermatogenic events and RT–PCR analysis has revealed that the EGF receptors ErbB1, ErbB2, ErbB3 and ErbB4 are expressed in all the stages of spermatogenesis (Wahab-Wahlgren et al., 2003Go).

The origin and the fate of the mRNAs found in the human sperm nucleus are yet to be discussed. The question is raised as to whether these RNAs are stored in the sperm nucleus after being transcribed in early spermatids or are eventually synthesized in the mature spermatozoa, in spite of the apparent transcriptionally inert state of the nucleus (Kierszenbaum and Tres, 1975Go). Interestingly, the presence of residual DNA and RNA polymerase activity within the sperm chromatin has been formerly reported (Hecht, 1974Go; Witkin et al., 1975Go; Chevaillier and Philippe, 1976Go; Miteva et al., 1995Go). Later on, complementary investigations have indicated that in spite of a high degree of DNA packaging within the human sperm head, chromatin retains some features of active chromatin, mainly acetylated histones (Gatewood et al., 1990Go) and the arrangement of certain chromatin domains into the nucleosomes (Gineitis et al., 2000Go; Zalenskaya et al., 2000Go). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that DNA regions linked to histones may represent sites of active transcription. However, transcription within the sperm genome is yet to be conclusively demonstrated in vivo. In fact, persistence of transcripts in mature spermatozoa is more likely to be the result of an overexpression process in the spermatid genome, as illustrated by the presence of transcripts for transition proteins and protamines whose synthesis and deposition are known to be achieved at the end of spermiogenesis (Dadoune, 2003Go).

With a few exceptions concerning, for example, c-Myc (Naz et al., 1991Go; Kumar et al., 1993Go), transcription factor Stat 4 (Herrada and Wolgemuth, 1997Go; Siffroi and Dadoune, 2001Go), angiotensin converting enzyme (Kohn et al., 1998Go; Siffroi and Dadoune, 2001Go), N-cadherin (Goodwin et al., 2000aGo) and P450 aromatase (Carreau et al., 2001Go), there is no evidence that the proteins corresponding to the majority of mRNAs found in the mature spermatozoa are also present. Therefore, to date, the possible role of these transcripts in the function of spermatozoa cannot be inferred. However, if the mRNAs accumulated in the sperm nucleus are not residual non-functional materials, they might be viewed as the male gametes contribution to early embryogenesis. Delivering spermatozoan RNA to the ovocyte has been demonstrated in mice (Hayashi et al., 2003Go) and humans (Ostermeier et al., 2004Go) as well. Some sperm transcripts encoding proteins known to participate in fertilization and embryonic development have been specifically detected in early embryos after in vitro fertilization failure, while they have not been found in the ovocyte (Ostermeier et al., 2002Go). Thus, human spermatozoa could act not only as genome carriers but also as providers of specific transcripts necessary for zygotic viability and development before activation of the embryonic genome.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Anderson HD, Wang F and Gardner DG (2004) Role of the epidermal growth factor receptor in signaling strain-dependent activation of the brain natriuretic peptide gene. J Biol Chem 279, 9287–9297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aquila S, Sisci D, Gentile M, Middea E, Siciliano L and Ando S (2002) Human ejaculated spermatozoa contain active P450 aromatase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87, 3385–3390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Armant DR, Wang J and Liu Z (2000) Intracellular signaling in the developing blastocyst as a consequence of the maternal-embryonic dialogue. Semin Reprod Med 18, 273–287.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Boulogne B, Levacher C, Durand P and Habert R (1999) Retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors in the rat testis during fetal and postnatal development: immunolocalization and implication in the control of the number of gonocytes. Biol Reprod 61, 1548–1557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carreau S, Bourguiba S, Lambard S, Galeraud-Denis I, Genissel C, Bilinska B, Benahmed M and Levallet J (2001) Aromatase expression in male germ cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 79, 203–208.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Catelli MG, Devin-Leclerc J, Bouhouche I and Cadepond F (1999) Functional interaction of HSP90 with steroid receptors. J Soc Biol 193, 361–367.[Medline]

Chelly J, Concordet JP, Kaplan JC and Kahn A (1989) Illegitimate transcription: transcription of any gene in any cell type. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86, 2617–2621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chevaillier P and Philippe M (1976) In situ detection of a DNA-polymerase activity in the nuclei of mouse spermatozoa. Chromosoma 54, 33–37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chiang MH, Steuerwald N, Lambert H, Main EK and Steinleitner A (1994) Detection of human leukocyte antigen class I messenger ribonucleic acid transcripts in human spermatozoa via reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction. Fertil Steril 61, 276–280.[Web of Science][Medline]

Com E, Bourgeon F, Evrard B, Ganz T, Colleu D, Jegou B and Pineau C (2003) Expression of antimicrobial defensins in the male reproductive tract of rats, mice, and humans. Biol Reprod 68, 95–104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dadoune JP (2003) Expression of mammalian spermatozoal nucleoproteins. Microsc Res Tech 61, 56–75.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Dejucq N, Dugast I, Ruffault A, Van der Meide PH and Jégou B (1995) Interferon-{alpha} and-{gamma} expression in the rat testis. Endocrinology 136, 4925–4931.[Abstract]

Delfino F and Walker WH (1998) Stage-specific nuclear expression of NF-kappaB in mammalian testis. Mol Endocrinol 12, 1696–1707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eddy EM (2002) Male germ cell gene expression. Recent Prog Horm Res 57, 103–128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eddy EM, Toshimori K and O'Brien DA (2003) Fibrous sheath of mammalian spermatozoa. Microsc Res Tech 61, 103–115.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gaemers IC, van Pelt AM, van der Saag PT, Hoogerbrugge JW, Themmen AP and de Rooij DG (1998) Differential expression pattern of retinoid X receptors in adult murine testicular cells implies varying roles for these receptors in spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod 58, 1351–1356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Galang CK and Hauser CA (1992) Cooperative DNA binding of the highly conserved human Hox 2.1 homeodomain gene product. New Biol 4, 558–568.[Web of Science][Medline]

Gatewood JM, Cook GR, Balhorn R, Schmid CW and Bradbury EM (1990) Isolation of four core histones from human sperm chromatin representing a minor subset of somatic histones. J Biol Chem 265, 20662–20666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gineitis AA, Zalenskaya IA, Yau PM, Bradbury EM and Zalensky AO (2000) Human sperm telomere-binding complex involves histone H2B and secures telomere membrane attachment. J Cell Biol 151, 1591–1598.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goodwin LO, Karabinus DS and Pergolizzi RG (2000a) Presence of N-cadherin transcripts in mature spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 6, 487–497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goodwin LO, Karabinus DS, Pergolizzi RG and Benoff S (2000b) L-type voltage-dependent calcium channel alpha-1C subunit mRNA is present in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 6, 127–136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gupta S, Barrett T, Whitmarsh AJ, Cavanagh J, Sluss HK, Derijard B and Davis RJ (1996) Selective interaction of JNK protein kinase isoforms with transcription factors. EMBO J 15, 2760–2770.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hayashi S, Yang J, Christenson L, Yanagimachi R and Hecht NB (2003) Mouse preimplantation embryos developed from oocytes injected with round spermatids or spermatozoa have similar but distinct patterns of early messenger RNA expression. Biol Reprod 69, 1170–1176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hecht NB (1974) A DNA polymerase isolated from bovine spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 41, 345–354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Herrada G and Wolgemuth DJ (1997) The mouse transcription factor Stat 4 is expressed in haploid male germ cells and is present in the nuclear theca of spermatozoa. J Cell Sci 110, 1543–1553.[Abstract]

Hirata S, Shoda T, Kato J and Hoshi K (2001) The multiple untranslated first exons system of the human estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) gene. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 78, 33–40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kierszenbaum AL and Tres LL (1975) Structural and transcriptional features of the mouse spermatid genome. J Cell Biol 65, 252–270.

Kimoto Y (1998) A single human cell expresses all messenger ribonucleic acids: the arrow of time in a cell. Mol Gen Genet 258, 233–239.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kohn FM, Dammshauser I, Neukamm C, Renneberg H, Siems WE, Schill WB and Aumuller G (1998) Ultrastructural localization of angiotensin-converting enzyme in ejaculated spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 13, 604–610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kramer JA and Krawetz SA (1997) RNA in spermatozoa: implications for the alternative haploid genome. Mol Hum Reprod 3, 473–478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kumar G, Patel D and Naz RK (1993) c-MYC mRNA is present in human sperm cells. Cell Mol Biol Res 39, 111–117.[Web of Science][Medline]

Lambard S, Galeraud-Denis I, Martin G, Levy R, Chocat A and Carreau S (2004) Analysis and significance of mRNA in human ejaculated sperm from normozoospermic donors: relationship to sperm motility and capacitation. Mol Hum Reprod 10, 535–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leach RE, Khalifa R, Ramirez ND, Das SK, Wang J, Dey SK, Romero R and Armant DR (1999) Multiple roles for heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor are suggested by its cell-specific expression during the human endometrial cycle and early placentation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84, 3355–3363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Levallet J, Bilinska B, Mittre H, Genissel C, Fresnel J and Carreau S (1998) Expression and immunolocalization of functional cytochrome P450 aromatase in mature rat testicular cells. Biol Reprod 58, 919–926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lilienbaum A, Sage J, Memet S, Rassoulzadegan M, Cuzin F and Israel A (2000) NF-kappa B is developmentally regulated during spermatogenesis in mice. Dev Dyn 219, 333–340.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lin YM, Chen CW, Sun HS, Tsai SJ, Lin JS and Kuo PL (2002) Presence of DAZL transcript and protein in mature human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 77, 626–629.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lindsey S and Wilkinson MF (1996) Homeobox genes and male reproductive development. J Assist Reprod Genet 13, 182–192.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Luconi M, Bonaccorsi L, Bini L, Liberatori S, Pallini V, Forti G and Baldi E (2002) Characterization of membrane nongenomic receptors for progesterone in human spermatozoa. Steroids 67, 505–509.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Miller D (2000) Analysis and significance of messenger RNA in human ejaculated spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev 56, 259–264.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Miller D, Tang PZ, Skinner C and Lilford R (1994) Differential RNA fingerprinting as a tool in the analysis of spermatozoal gene expression. Hum Reprod 9, 864–869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miller D, Briggs D, Snowden H, Hamlington J, Rollinson S, Lilford R and Krawetz SA (1999) A complex population of RNAs exists in human ejaculate spermatozoa: implications for understanding molecular aspects of spermiogenesis. Gene 237, 385–392.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Miteva K, Valkov N, Goncharova-Peinova J, Kovachev K, Zlatarev S, Pironcheva G and Russev G (1995) Electron microscopic demonstration of transcription of ram sperm chromatin. Microbios 84, 91–96.[Web of Science][Medline]

Muller R, Slamon DJ, Tremblay JM, Cline MJ and Verma IM (1982) Differential expression of cellular oncogenes during pre- and postnatal development of the mouse. Nature 299, 640–644.[CrossRef][Medline]

Naz RK, Ahmad K and Kumar G (1991) Presence and role of c-myc proto-oncogene product in mammalian sperm cell function. Biol Reprod 44, 842–850.[Abstract]

Ohmura K, Kohno N, Kobayashi Y, Yamagata K, Sato S, Kashiwabara S and Baba T (1999) A homologue of pancreatic trypsin is localized in the acrosome of mammalian sperm and is released during acrosome reaction. J Biol Chem 274, 29426–29432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ostermeier GC, Dix DJ, Miller D, Khatri P and Krawetz SA (2002) Spermatozoal RNA profiles of normal fertile men. Lancet 360, 772–777.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ostermeier GC, Miller D, Huntriss JD, Diamond MP and Krawetz SA (2004) Reproductive biology: delivering spermatozoan RNA to the oocyte. Nature 429, 154.[Medline]

Park JY, Ahn HJ, Gu JG, Lee KH, Kim JS, Kang HW and Lee JH (2003) Molecular identification of Ca2+ channels in human sperm. Exp Mol Med 35, 285–292.[Web of Science][Medline]

Passananti C, Corbi N, Paggi MG, Russo MA, Perez M, Cotelli F, Stefanini M and Amati P (1995) The product of Zfp59 (Mfg2), a mouse gene expressed at the spermatid stage of spermatogenesis, accumulates in spermatozoa nuclei. Cell Growth Differ 6, 1037–1044.[Abstract]

Pessot CA, Brito M, Figueroa J, Concha II, Yanez A and Burzio LO (1989) Presence of RNA in the sperm nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 158, 272–278.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Petersen C, Fuzesi L and Hoyer-Fender S (1999) Outer dense fibre proteins from human sperm tail: molecular cloning and expression analyses of two cDNA transcripts encoding proteins of approximately 70 kDa. Mol Hum Reprod 5, 627–635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Picard D (2002) Heat-shock protein 90, a chaperone for folding and regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci 59, 1640–1648.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Pittoggi C, Magnano AR, Sciamanna I, Giordano R, Lorenzini R and Spadafora C (2001) Specific localization of transcription factors in the chromatin of mouse mature spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev 60, 97–106.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Richter W, Dettmer D and Glander H (1999) Detection of mRNA transcripts of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase subtypes in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 5, 732–736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rohwedder A, Liedigk O, Schaller J, Glander HJ and Werchau H (1996) Detection of mRNA transcripts of beta 1 integrins in ejaculated human spermatozoa by nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Mol Hum Reprod 2, 499–505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sachdeva G, Shah CA, Kholkute SD and Puri CP (2000) Detection of progesterone receptor transcript in human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 62, 1610–1614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmidt M, Nagel S, Proba J, Thiede C, Ritter M, Waring JF, Rosenbauer F, Huhn D, Wittig B, Horak I and Neubauer A (1998) Lack of interferon consensus sequence binding protein (ICSBP) transcripts in human myeloid leukemias. Blood 91, 22–29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Siffroi JP and Dadoune JP (2001) Accumulation of transcripts in the mature human sperm nucleus: implication of the haploid genome in a functional role. Ital J Anat Embryol 106, 189–197.[Medline]

Steger K (1999) Transcriptional and translational regulation of gene expression in haploid spermatids. Anat Embryol (Berl) 199, 471–487.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tamada H, Higashiyama C, Takano H, Kawate N, Inaba T and Sawada T (1999) The effects of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor on preimplantation-embryo development and implantation in the rat. Life Sci 64, 1967–1973.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wahab-Wahlgren A, Martinelle N, Holst M, Jahnukainen K, Parvinen M and Soder O (2003) EGF stimulates rat spermatogonial DNA synthesis in seminiferous tubule segments in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol 201, 39–46.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Witkin SS, Korngold GC and Bendich A (1975) Ribonuclease-sensitive DNA-synthesizing complex in human sperm heads and seminal fluid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72, 3295–3299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wong EY, Tse JY, Yao KM, Tam PC and Yeung WS (2002) VCY2 protein interacts with the HECT domain of ubiquitin-protein ligase E3A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 296, 1104–1111.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

World Health Organization (1999) Laboratory Manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th edn, 4. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

Wykes SM, Visscher DW and Krawetz SA (1997) Haploid transcripts persist in mature human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 3, 15–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zalenskaya IA, Bradbury EM, and Zalensky AO (2000) Chromatin structure of telomere domain in human sperm. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 279, 213–218.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Submitted on September 28, 2004; resubmitted on November 10, 2004; accepted on November 17, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
N. Bissonnette, J.-P. Levesque-Sergerie, C. Thibault, and G. Boissonneault
Spermatozoal transcriptome profiling for bull sperm motility: a potential tool to evaluate semen quality
Reproduction, July 1, 2009; 138(1): 65 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Avendano, A. Franchi, E. Jones, and S. Oehninger
Pregnancy-specific {beta}-1-glycoprotein 1 and human leukocyte antigen-E mRNA in human sperm: differential expression in fertile and infertile men and evidence of a possible functional role during early development
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 270 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Lalancette, C. Thibault, I. Bachand, N. Caron, and N. Bissonnette
Transcriptome Analysis of Bull Semen with Extreme Nonreturn Rate: Use of Suppression-Subtractive Hybridization to Identify Functional Markers for Fertility
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2008; 78(4): 618 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
I. Gilbert, N. Bissonnette, G. Boissonneault, M. Vallee, and C. Robert
A molecular analysis of the population of mRNA in bovine spermatozoa
Reproduction, June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1073 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
H.-G. Li, X.-F. Ding, A.-H. Liao, X.-B. Kong, and C.-L. Xiong
Expression of CatSper family transcripts in the mouse testis during post-natal development and human ejaculated spermatozoa: relationship to sperm motility
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 13(5): 299 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Z.-M. Cai, Y.-T. Gui, X. Guo, J. Yu, L.-D. Guo, L.-B. Zhang, H. Wang, and J. Yu
Low Expression of Glycoprotein Subunit 130 in Ejaculated Spermatozoa from Asthenozoospermic Men
J Androl, September 1, 2006; 27(5): 645 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. K. Naz and R. Sellamuthu
Receptors in Spermatozoa: Are They Real?
J Androl, September 1, 2006; 27(5): 627 - 636.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Schuel and L. J. Burkman
A Tale of Two Cells: Endocannabinoid-Signaling Regulates Functions of Neurons and Sperm
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2005; 73(6): 1078 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D Modi, C Shah, G Sachdeva, S Gadkar, D Bhartiya, and C Puri
Ontogeny and cellular localization of SRY transcripts in the human testes and its detection in spermatozoa
Reproduction, November 1, 2005; 130(5): 603 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/2/133    most recent
gah137v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dadoune, J.P.
Right arrow Articles by Siffroi, J.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dadoune, J.P.
Right arrow Articles by Siffroi, J.P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?