Skip Navigation


Mol. Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on November 21, 2008
Molecular Human Reproduction 2008 14(12):711-719; doi:10.1093/molehr/gan067
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/12/711    most recent
gan067v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assou, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hamamah, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assou, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hamamah, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Molecular Human Reproduction issue: Special Issue: Emerging Technologies for the Assessment of Gametes and Embryos - The OMICS [View the issue table of contents]

A non-invasive test for assessing embryo potential by gene expression profiles of human cumulus cells: a proof of concept study

S. Assou1,2,3,{dagger}, D. Haouzi1,2,3,{dagger}, K. Mahmoud4, A. Aouacheria5, Y. Guillemin5, V. Pantesco1, T. Rème1,3, H. Dechaud2, J. De Vos1,3 and S. Hamamah1,2,3,6

1CHU Montpellier, Institut de Recherche en Biothérapie, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier F-34000, France 2CHU Montpellier, Département de Médecine et Biologie de la Reproduction, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier F-34000, France 3INSERM, U847 ‘Développement embryonnaire précoce et cellules souches embryonnaires humaines’, Montpellier F-34000, France 4Centre de FIV, Tunis, Tunisia 5IBCP, Institut de Biologie et Chimie des Protéines, UMR 5086 CNRS / Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon F-69367, France

6 Correspondence address. ART/PGD Division, Département de Médecine et Biologie de la Reproduction Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve INSERM U 847, Montpellier 34295, France. Tel: +33- 04-67336404; Fax: +33-04-67336290; E-mail: s-hamamah{at}chu-montpellier.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Identification of new criteria for embryo quality is required to improve the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization. The aim of this study was to determine the gene expression profile of cumulus cells (CC) surrounding the oocyte as biomarkers for embryo potential and to identify genes to be used as prognostic indicators of successful pregnancy. CC from single oocytes were analysed using DNA microarrays. Gene expression profiles of CC surrounding the oocyte associated with good embryonic quality and pregnancy outcome were computed. We observed that CC issued from oocytes that developed into embryos with a good morphology had differing gene expression profile according to the pregnancy outcome of the embryo. We demonstrated that the expression of BCL2L11, PCK1 and NFIB in CC is significantly correlated with embryo potential and successful pregnancy. These results were confirmed by quantitative RT–PCR. The gene expression profiling of human CC correlates with embryo potential and pregnancy outcome. BCL2L11, PCK1 and NFIB genes are proposed as biomarkers for predicting pregnancy. Our findings suggest a non-invasive approach, offering a new potential strategy for competent embryo selection. This approach should be validated in single-embryo transfer programmes.

Key words: cumulus cells/microarray/embryo/non-invasive biomarkers


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In assisted reproductive technology (ART), pregnancy and birth rates following in vitro fertilization (IVF) attempts remain low. Indeed, 2 out of 3 IVF cycles fail to result in pregnancy (SART, 2004) and more than 8 out of 10 transferred embryos fail to implant (Kovalevsky and Patrizio, 2005). Subjective morphological parameters are still a primary criterion to select healthy embryos used for in IVF and ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) programmes. However, such criteria do not truly predict the competence of an embryo. Many studies have shown that a combination of several different morphologic criteria leads to more accurate embryo selection (Scott et al., 2000; Balaban and Urman, 2006; La Sala et al., 2008). Morphological criteria for embryo selection are assessed on the day of transfer, and are principally based on early embryonic cleavage (25–27 h post-insemination), the number and size of blastomeres on Day 2 or Day 3, fragmentation percentage and the presence of multi-nucleation in the 4- or 8-cell stage (Fenwick et al., 2002). However, a recent study has shown that the selection of oocytes for insemination does not improve outcome of ART as compared with the transfer of all available embryos, irrespective of their quality (La Sala et al., 2008). Hence, more than 50% of IVF-born babies are from multiple gestations (Reddy et al., 2007). Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies caused by ART are estimated to account for approximately $890 million of US health care costs annually (Bromer and Seli, 2008). There is a need to identify viable embryos with the highest implantation potential to increase IVF success rates, reduce the number of embryos for fresh replacement, lower multiple pregnancy rates and lower early pregnancy losses. For all these reasons, several biomarkers for embryo selection are currently being investigated (Pearson, 2006; Haouzi et al., 2008). As embryos that result in pregnancy differ in their metabolomic profiles compared with embryos that do not, some studies are trying to identify a molecular signature that can be detected by non-invasive evaluation of the embryo culture medium (Gardner et al., 2001; Brison et al., 2004; Sakkas and Gardner, 2005; Seli et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2007).

Genomics are also providing vital knowledge of genetic and cellular function during embryonic development (McKenzie et al., 2004) and Feuerstein et al. (2007) have reported that the expression of several genes in cumulus cells (CC), such as cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), was indicative of oocyte and embryo quality. Gremlin 1 (GREM1), hyaluronic acid synthase 2 (HAS2), steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (STAR), stearoyl-co-enzyme A desaturase 1 and 5 (SCD1 and 5), amphiregulin (AREG) and pentraxin 3 (PTX3) have also been shown to be positively correlated with embryo quality (Zhang et al., 2005). More recently, the expression of glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3), chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), cyclin D2 (CCND2) and catenin delta 1 (CTNND1) in human CC have been shown to be inversely correlated with embryo quality, based on early-cleavage rates during embryonic development (van Montfoort et al., 2008). But, despite the fact that early cleavage has been shown to be a reliable biomarker for predicting pregnancy (Lundin et al., 2001; van Montfoort et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2007), gene expression profiles of CC had not been studied with respect to pregnancy outcome.

The aim of this study was to determine the gene expression profile of CC as biomarkers of embryo potential and to identify genes to be used as a prognostic indicators of successful pregnancy.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Patients and IVF treatment
In this retrospective study, normo-responder patients (n = 30) aged 30.9 ± 2.5 years and referred to our centre for ICSI for male infertility factor were studied. This study has received institutional review board approval. Patients were stimulated with a combination of GnRH agonist or antagonist with recombinant FSH (GonalF, Puregon; respectively of Merck-Serono and Organon) or with hMG (Menopur, Ferring). Ovarian response was evaluated by serum estradiol level and ultrasound examination to monitor follicle development. Retrieval of oocytes was performed 36 h after hCG administration (5000 IU), under ultrasound guidance.

Assessment of embryo quality
On Day 2 and 3 post-microinjection, the quality parameters of individually cultured embryo were evaluated using the number of blastomeres and the degree of fragmentation as criteria (grade 1–2: equally sized blastomeres and 0–20% fragmentation, grade 3–4: no equally sized blastomeres and >20% fragmentation. A top-quality embryo was defined on Day 3 as 6–8 cells, equally sized blastomeres and no fragmentation. One or two embryos were transferred on Day 3 after oocyte retrieval. Clinical pregnancy was evaluated 2 and 6 weeks after embryo transfer based respectively on serum beta-hCG and ultrasound examination (presence of gestational sac with heart beat).

Cumulus cells
All CC samples were frozen on oocyte collection day. Then, one to three CC samples per patient were randomly selected for microarray analysis. A total of 50 CC samples were collected from 50 single oocytes and analysed individually: 34 CC from grade 1–2 embryos (n = 20 patients), 11 CC from grade 3–4 embryos (n = 10 patients) and 5 CC from unfertilized oocytes (n = 5 patients) (Table I). The data analysis was performed under double blind conditions in which pregnancy outcome was disclosed only after microarrays were hybridized. Regarding pregnancy outcome, the 45 CC from fertilized oocytes included 16 CC from grade 1–2 embryos that did not result into pregnancy (n = 9 patients), 18 CC associated with a positive pregnancy outcome (n = 11 patients) and 11 CC from grade 3–4 embryos that were not transferred. CC were stripped immediately following oocyte recovery (<40 h post-hCG administration). CC were mechanically removed and washed in culture medium and immediately frozen at –80°C in RLT RNA extraction buffer (RNeasy kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) before RNA extraction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table I. The characteristics of CC samples in this study.

 
Granulosa cells
An independent group of normo-responder patients (n = 8) (aged 34.8 ± 3.2 years) referred for ICSI programme for male infertility factor was selected for granulosa cells collection (Eight samples). Immediately after oocyte recovery, follicular fluids from matures follicles (>17 mm) of the same patient were pooled, after removal of the cumulus–oocyte complex and diluted in 1/3 volume of HBSS solution (BioWhittaker) in 50 ml batches, representing one sample. Granulosa cells purification was adapted from the protocol by Kolena et al. (1983). Following a 20 min centrifugation at 500g in swinging buckets, granulosa cells were collected on a Ficoll cushion (12 ml Lymphocyte separation medium, BioWhittaker). They were successively washed in HBSS and PBS, incubated 5 min in blood lysis buffer (KHCO3 10 mM, NH4Cl 150 mM, EDTA 0.1 mM) to remove red blood cells, counted and pelleted in PBS before lysis in RLT buffer (Quiagen) and storage at –80°C. The number of follicular puncture and the number of purified granulosa cells ranged from 6 to 12 and from 2x106 to 9x106, respectively.

Complementary RNA preparation and microarray hybridization
CC and granulosa cells RNA was extracted using the micro RNeasy Kit (Qiagen). The total RNA quantity was measured with a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) and RNA integrity was assessed with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA). cRNA was prepared with two rounds of amplification according to the manufacturer's protocol ‘double amplification’ (Two-Cycle cDNA Synthesis Kit, Invitrogen) starting from total RNA (ranging from 70 to 100 ng). cRNA obtained after the first amplification ranged from 0.1 to 1.9 µg/µl and after the second amplification ranged from 1.6 to 4.5 µg/µl.

Labelled fragmented cRNA (12 µg) was hybridized to oligonucleotide probes on an Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 array containing 54 675 sets of oligonucleotide probes (‘probeset’) which correspond to {approx}30 000 unique human genes or predicted genes. Each cumulus and granulosa sample was put individually on a microarray chip.

Data processing
Scanned GeneChip images were processed using Affymetrix GCOS 1.4 software to obtain an intensity value and a detection call (present, marginal or absent) for each probeset, using the default analysis settings and global scaling as first normalization method, with a trimmed mean target intensity value (TGT) of each array arbitrarily set to 100. Probe intensities were derived using the MAS5.0 algorithm. This algorithm also determines whether a gene is expressed with a defined confidence level or not (‘detection call’). This ‘call’ can either be ‘present’ (when the perfect match probes are significantly more hybridized than the mismatch probes, P < 0.04), ‘marginal’ (for P > 0.04 and P < 0.06) or ‘absent’ (P > 0.06). The microarray data were obtained in our laboratory in agreement with the Minimal Information about a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) recommendations (Brazma et al., 2001).

Data analysis and visualization
Significant Analysis of microarrays (SAM) (Tusher et al., 2001) (http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/SAM/) was used to identify genes whose expression varied significantly between sample groups. SAM provides mean or median fold change (FC) values and a false discovery rate (FDR) confidence percentage based on data permutation (mean FC >2 and FDR <5%). Array analysis allowing the comparison of gene expression profile between CC samples and granulosa cell samples is first based on the significant RNA detection (detection call ‘present’ or ‘absent’) and then, submitted to a SAM to identify genes whose expression varied significantly between sample groups. To perform the comparison of gene expression profile between CC samples according embryonic quality and/or pregnancy outcome, a non-supervised selection of probesets using a variation coefficient (CV ≥40%) and a absent/present ‘detection call’ filter was performed before the SAM. To compare profile expression of CC from altered (grade 3–4) and good (grade 1–2) embryonic development, or from embryos leading, or not, to a pregnancy, we performed an unsupervised classification with both principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering (Eisen et al., 1998; de Hoon et al., 2004). The PCA involved original scripts based on the R statistics software through the RAGE web interface (http://rage.montp.inserm.fr) (Reme et al., 2008). Hierarchical clustering analysis based on the expression levels of varying probes was performed with the CLUSTER and TREEVIEW software packages. To uncover functional biological networks and top canonical pathways, we imported gene expression signatures into the Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) Software (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA, USA).

Ingenuity pathway analysis
Genes were analysed using IPA software (Ingenuity Systems). Those genes with known gene symbols and their corresponding expression values were uploaded into the software. Each gene symbol was mapped to its corresponding gene object in the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base. Networks of these genes were algorithmically generated based on their connectivity and assigned a score. The score is a numerical value used to rank networks according to how relevant they are to the genes in the input dataset but may not be an indication of the quality or significance of the network. The score takes into account the number of focus genes in the network and the size of the network to approximate how relevant this network is to the original list of focus genes. The network identified is then presented as a graph indicating the molecular relationships between genes/gene products. Genes are represented as nodes, and the biological relationship between two nodes is represented as an edge (line). The intensity of the node colour indicated the degree of up-regulation. Canonical pathways analysis identified the pathways, from the IPA library of canonical pathways, which were most significant to the input data set. The significance of the association between the data set and the canonical pathway was determined based on two parameters: (i) A ratio of the number of genes from the data set that map to the pathway divided by the total number of genes that map to the canonical pathway and (ii) a P-value calculated using Fischer's exact test determining the probability that the association between the genes in the data set and the canonical pathway is due to chance alone.

Quantitative RT–PCR analyses
For quantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (qRT–PCR) analysis, 10 CC samples used in the microarray experiments were selected according to their pregnancy outcome (5 CC samples associated with a negative outcome and 5 to a positive outcome corresponding to 10 patients). Labelled cRNA (1 µg) from the patient was used to generate first-strand cDNA. These cDNAs (5 µl of a 1/10 dilution) were used for real-time quantitative PCR reactions according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Applied Biosytems). The 20 µl reaction mixture consisted of cDNA (5 µl), 1 µM of primers and 10 µl of TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The amplification was measured during 40 cycles with an annealing temperature at 60°C. The amount of PCR product produced in every cycle step of the PCR reaction is monitored by TaqMan probe. A threshold is set in the exponential phase of the amplification curve, from which the cycle number (‘Ct’ for ‘cycle threshold’) is read off. The Ct value is used in the calculation of relative mRNA transcript levels. Effectiveness (E) of the PCR was measured. This effectiveness is obtained by a standard curve corresponding to the primers used. Quantitative RT–PCR was performed using the ABI Prism 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems) and normalized to PGK1 for each sample using the following formula: Formula , {Delta}Ct = Ct control—Ct unknown, control=one CC sample of the non-pregnant group). Each sample was analysed in duplicate, and multiple water blanks were included with the analysis. Primers for BCL2L11, PCK1 (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1) and NFIB were obtained through Applied Biosystems: BCl2l11 (Hs00708019_s1), PCK1 (Hs00159918_m1), NFIB (Hs00232149_m1). The qRT–PCR has been carried out on 5/18 (pregnancy group) and 5/16 (no pregnancy group) CC samples. NS: not significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Gene expression profile of CC according to embryo outcome
To identify a gene expression profile in CC that correlated with embryo outcome, we established a gene expression signature for each outcome category: CC of unfertilized oocytes, CC from oocytes that resulted in embryo development but extensive fragmentation (grade 3–4) and CC from oocytes that resulted in embryo development with no or limited fragmentation (grade 1–2). Granulosa cells samples were taken as a reference tissue (control). Indeed, granulosa cells are cells closely related to CC as opposed to other adult tissues. The use of this reference tissue lowered the number of differentially expressed genes related to crude lineage differences, thus facilitating the identification of subtle variation in the CC/oocyte interplay. A SAM analysis showed that 2605 genes were up-regulated in the unfertilized group, 2739 in the grade 3–4 group and 2482 in the grade 1–2 group with a FDR <5%. Conversely, 4270, 4349 and 4483 genes were down-regulated, respectively. These lists of genes were then intersected to determine their overlap (Fig. 1). While 449 up- and 890 down-expressed genes were in common in all three groups, each category displayed a specific gene expression profile. Interestingly, 860 up-regulated genes, including for example Galanin and Gap Junction A5 (GJA5), and 1416 down-regulated genes, including HLA-G and EGR1 were specifically modulated in CC associated with a good morphological embryonic quality. It must be noted that although the grade 1–2 group displayed a strong gene expression profile, this group was heterogeneous regarding to pregnancy outcome and included 18 CC samples associated with embryos that resulted in pregnancy (including four twin pregnancies) but also 16 CC samples associated with embryos that failed to give rise to pregnancy.


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1: Venn diagram of transcripts up-regulated (A) and down-regulated (B) in CC versus granulosa cells.

Each list of genes was determined with the SAM software with a FDR <5%.

 
Gene expression profile of CC according to pregnancy outcome
CC samples were therefore compared according to the pregnancy outcome. A SAM analysis delineated a ‘pregnancy outcome’ list of 630 genes that varied significantly (FDR <5%) between the two groups of patients (pregnancy versus no pregnancy). PCA and hierarchical clustering confirmed that this 630 genes list indeed segregated a majority of CC samples associated with pregnancy from those associated with no pregnancy (Fig. 2A and B). Of note, genes from the ‘pregnancy outcome’ list were predominantly up-regulated in samples associated with a good outcome. The ‘pregnancy outcome’ expression signature was particularly marked in a subgroup of 10 CC samples from embryos associated with the ‘pregnancy’ group.


Figure 2
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2: The ‘pregnancy outcome’ gene list delineates two groups of CC samples according to pregnancy outcome.

(A) PCA was performed on 45 cumulus samples on 630 genes differentially expressed between CC associated with a pregnancy versus CC not associated with pregnancy (‘pregnancy outcome’ list). The distance between samples reflects the similarity of overall gene expression patterns. Circles: CC from oocytes that gave rise to grade 1–2 embryos; squares: CC from oocytes that gave rise to grade 3–4 embryos; closed circles: association with pregnancy; open circles and squares: no pregnancy. (B) The expression signatures of CC were visualized by hierarchical clustering on the pregnancy outcome gene list. Expression pattern are represented as clusters where each row corresponds to a transcript and each column to a sample. The colours indicate the relative expression levels of each gene, with red indicating an expression above median, green indicating expression under median and black representing median expression. Candidate biomarkers up-regulated (BCL2L11, PCK1) and down-regulated (NFIB) in CC from the positive pregnancy outcome group as evidenced by microarray. (C) Identification of overrepresented functional networks in the pregnancy outcome gene signature using IPA in genes up-regulated (569 genes). Significance as determined by IPA was plotted as –log (P-value). (D) Same analysis on the down-regulated gene list (61 genes).

 
Functional annotation of the pregnancy outcome gene list
To investigate biological processes correlated to embryo achieving pregnancy, Ingenuity and Pubmed databases were used to annotate the 630 genes from the ‘pregnancy outcome’ gene list. Among genes whose overexpression is associated with pregnancy, the most significantly overrepresented pathways were ‘oxidative stress’, ‘TR/RXR activation’, ‘G2/M transition of the cell cycle’, ‘xenobiotic metabolism’ and ‘NFKappaB’ signalling (Fig. 2C). Among these pathways, the most representative genes were interleukins, chemokines, adptator proteins and kinases: IL1Beta (x4.5 in pregnancy samples versus no pregnancy, P = 0.001), IL16 (x4.8, P = 0.001), IL8 (x2.6, P = 0.007), IL1RN (x2.1, P = 0.0051), IL17RC (x3.6, P = 0.001), TIRAP (x8.0, P = 0.001), CXCL12 (x3.1, P = 0.001), CCR5 (x2.6, P = 0.0051) and PCK1 (x3.4, P = 0.001). Strikingly, numerous genes involved in the regulation of apoptosis were significantly modulated in CC samples from oocytes resulting in a pregnancy. These genes were BCL2L11 (x6.9, P < 0.001), CRADD (x2, P = 0.0036), NEMO (x4.6, P < 0.001), BCL10 (x3.1, P < 0.001), SERPINB8 (x9.1, P < 0.001) and TNFSF13 (x2.5, P = 0.0038).

On the other hand, genes associated with no pregnancy were correlated with the following pathways: G2/M DNA damage and checkpoint regulation of the cell cycle, ‘Sonic hedgehog’, ‘IGF-1’, ‘complement system’ and ‘Wnt/Beta-catenin’ signalling (Fig. 2D). Representative genes correlated with no pregnancy included NFIB (x0.3, P < 0.001), MAD2L1 (x0.4, P < 0.001) and IGF1R (x0.4, P < 0.001).

Candidate genes expressed in CC for embryo potential
The SAM analysis of CC according to pregnancy outcome identified genes that are candidate biomarkers for embryo potential that would differentiate between oocytes that produced embryos resulting in a pregnancy versus those that did not result in pregnancy based on CC analysis. Representative genes from the pregnancy outcome gene list were selected and qRT–PCR used to confirm independently the microarray data. We analysed the differential expression of two up-regulated genes (BCL2L11 and PCK1) and one down-regulated gene (NFIB) between CC from grade 1–2 embryos without positive pregnancy and CC from grade 1–2 embryos achieving pregnancy (Fig. 3). The qRT–PCR mean transcripts levels were 1.1 ± 0.9 versus 0.4 ± 0.3 (pregnancy versus no pregnancy) for BCL2L11 (P = 0.25, NS), 11.6 ± 8.8 versus 4.0 ± 2.5 for PCK1 (P = 0.22, NS) and 0.4 ± 0.3 versus 0.9 ± 0.4 for NFIB (P = 0.16, NS).


Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3: Quantitative RT–PCR confirmation.

Box-and-whisker plots comparing the expression level of NFIB, PCK1 and BCL2L11 in CC from the positive pregnancy outcome group and negative pregnancy outcome group. The signal intensity for each gene is shown on the y axis as arbitrary units determined by the GCOS 1.2 software (Affymetrix) or by quantitative real-time qRT–PCR analysis (five samples in each group). Data were normalized using PGK1 expression.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In most mammalian species including human, the CC which surrounds the oocyte are still present at the time of fertilization in the oviduct and remain until embryonic implantation. Extracellular matrix remodelling within and around the cumulus probably plays a key role in both of these steps. In this respect, we identified three promising genes expressed in CC that could be biomarkers for embryo potential and pregnancy outcome: BCL2L11, PCK1 and NFIB.

Some recent studies have suggested non-invasive methods for oocyte and embryo viability by analysing human follicular fluid or culture media (Gardner et al., 2001; Brison et al., 2004; Sakkas and Gardner, 2005; Seli et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2007). However, an important technical drawback is the number of metabolites and the concentration that each metabolite must reach to be detected.

Therefore, a few studies in human species have been conducted by studying CC or granulosa cells to identify biomarkers for oocyte quality and competence (Zhang et al., 2005; Hamel et al., 2008), or for early embryo development (McKenzie et al., 2004; van Montfoort et al., 2008) (Table II). Here we present a retrospective study that is the first one performing gene expression profiles of CC with respect to embryo quality and pregnancy outcome.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table II. Studies analysing the genomics of CC or granulosa cells to identify reliable biomarkers for oocyte quality and competence, and for embryo development predictors.

 
In our study, we demonstrated that genes expression profile of CC which surrounds oocyte correlated to different outcomes, allowing the identification of a specific expression signature of embryos developing towards pregnancy. Interestingly, genes in cumulus samples resulting in a successful pregnancy were predominantly up-regulated, including BCL2L11 and PCK1, respectively involved in apoptotis and gluconeogenesis. Some genes were nevertheless found down-regulated in CC associated with a good pregnancy outcome, such as the transcription factor NFIB. Related to a possible impact of hormonal treatment under COS, we compared the 26 CC after GnRH agonist with recombinant FSH or hMG to the 19 CC under GnRH antagonist with recombinant FSH or hMG. There were 16 genes significantly modulated (FDR <5%).

Abnormal cells are normally removed by apoptosis, a cell death programme, which is a physiological process in embryos (Haouzi et al., 2008). Many proteases involved in apoptotic processes have been well characterized, principally the caspases, which are key executioners of apoptosis. There are two major pathways of caspase activation: the extrinsic pathway mediated by death receptor activation, and the intrinsic pathway triggered by cellular stress or DNA damage. BCL2 family proteins, which include pro- and anti-apoptotic members, are critical regulators of the intrinsic pathway. The balance between pro- and anti-apoptotic members is a determining factor controlling cell survival or death decision. A strong incidence of CC apoptosis has been correlated with poor oocyte quality and low pregnancy rate (Lee et al., 2001). Recently, six up-regulated pro-apoptotic genes and two down-regulated anti-apoptotic genes were reported in CC from oocytes resulting in a non-early cleavage embryo (van Montfoort et al., 2008).

In the present study, we observed a significant differential expression of several genes involved in apoptotic pathways, including one BCL2 family member, BCL2L11, CRADD protein, BCL10, NEMO and a serpin. BCL2L11, also known as BIM, belongs to the BH3-only proteins, a pro-apoptotic subgroup of the BCL2 family that contains only one of the BCL2 homology regions (BH3). This BH3-only protein promotes apoptosis by inhibiting anti-apoptotic members such as BCL2 and/or directly activating the pro-apoptotic BAX and BAK proteins. Interestingly, BCL2L11 gene expression was up-regulated in CC correlated to a pregnancy outcome. These results suggest that BCL2L11, which may participate in the apoptotis of CC, is induced during oocyte development. A high level of BCL2L11 may sign this physiological process and therefore be a biomarker for optimal embryonic development.

Recently, it was demonstrated in a mouse model that nutritional support from CC is essential for growth and development of the mouse oocyte (Sugiura et al., 2007; Su et al., 2008). Evidence for the existence of a ‘dialogue’ between metabolic pathways of the CC and the oocyte, allowing the development of both cell types, has been documented. These metabolic pathways involve both glycolysis and cholesterol biosynthesis (Sugiura et al., 2007; Su et al., 2008). Interestingly, in our study, we observed an up-regulation of PCK1 mRNA in CC from oocytes that produce embryos resulting in a pregnancy. This gene is a main control point for the regulation of gluconeogenesis and catalyses the formation of phosphoenolpyruvate from oxaloacetate. Interestingly, the majority of genes involved in the network around the PCK1 gene were up-regulated (Fig. 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4: Top-ranked networks evidenced by Ingenuity Pathway software.

Top-ranked functional networks obtained from up-regulated genes from the ‘pregnancy outcome’ 1–2 signature were found to aggregate around BCL2L11 (A) and PCK1 (B) genes. The red colour intensity of the node indicated the degree of up-regulation. Uncoloured genes were not identified as differentially expressed in our experiment and but were integrated into the network for computational grounds. In each network, edge types are indicatives: a plain line indicates direct interaction, a dashed line indicates indirect interaction; a line without arrowhead indicates binding only, a line finishing with a vertical line indicates inhibition; a line with an arrowhead indicates ‘acts on’.

 
Nuclear factor I (NFI) consists of a family of four genes that each gives rise to multiple isoforms via alternative splicing (NFIA, NFIB, NFIC and NFIX). The NFI proteins play an important role in regulating tissue-specific gene expression during mammalian embryogenesis (Steele-Perkins et al., 2005). Interestingly, NFIB gene expression was down-regulated as confirmed by qRT–PCR, in CC associated with a pregnancy.

Other genes were found differentially expressed between CC with different pregnancy outcome. Among them, additional factors involved in apoptosis, such as BCL10, an anti-apoptotic gene found up-regulated in the pregnancy group. The protein encoded by this gene contains a caspase recruitment domain (CARD), and has been shown to both induce apoptosis and to activate NFKappaB. BCL10 is reported to interact with other CARD domain-containing proteins, which are thought to function as upstream regulators in NF{kappa}B signalling (Fig. 4A). Moreover, CRADD and IKBKG/FIP3/NEMO gene expression were also up-regulated in CC from oocytes that produce embryos resulting in a pregnancy. The proteins encoded by the CRADD and NEMO genes are respectively a death domain (CARD/DD)-containing protein and the regulatory subunit of IKK (IKappaB kinase). IKK signalling leads to the activation of NFKappaB, a transcription factor involved in protection against apoptosis (Courtois and Smahi, 2006). Moreover, the TNFSF13 gene was an up-regulated member of the network around the BCL2L11 gene (Fig. 4A). We previously identified TNFSF13 as highly produced by CC (Assou et al., 2006). The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) ligand family. Initially, this protein and its receptor, TNFRSF17, were found to be important for B cell development (Stein et al., 2002). In vitro experiments suggested that this protein may be able to attenuate apoptosis and to increase NFKappaB activation (He et al., 2004).

In conclusion, we found a differential gene expression between human CC from oocytes resulting in different pregnancy outcome from patients referred for ICSI for male infertility. This analysis is a novel concept, and provides new biomarker candidates to assess the embryo potential for pregnancy outcome, such as BCL2L11, PCK1 and NFIB. The relationship between CC apoptosis and the developmental competence of the corresponding oocytes are worthy of further investigation. Before any routine use, a large cohort of CC should be analysed by using microarrays and validated by qRT–PCR. Our results suggest that analysis of CC surrounding the oocyte can be a non-invasive approach for embryo selection. We envision the possibility to collect CC immediately after oocyte retrieval, analyse the CC with a genomic test (G-test) to assess the potential of the embryo and select the embryo for fresh replacement based on the G-test results (Fig. 5). As we did double-embryo transfer, the validation of new biomarkers such as BCL2L11, PCK1 and NFIB genes should be tested prospectively in single-embryo transfer programmes.


Figure 5
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5: Envisioned use of a genomic analysis of CC (‘G-test’) to identify the CC with the best gene expression profile according to pregnancy outcome.

 

    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
This work was supported in part by Ferring, Merck-Serono and Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We thank the University-Hospital of Montpellier and IRB for support and the ART team for their assistance during this study. The public repository accession number for microarray data will be available from the authors.


    Footnotes
 
{dagger}These authors contributed equally to this work. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Assou S, Anahory T, Pantesco V, Le Carrour T, Pellestor F, Klein B, Reyftmann L, Dechaud H, De Vos J, Hamamah S. The human cumulus–oocyte complex gene-expression profile. Hum Reprod (2006) 21:1705–1719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Balaban B, Urman B. Effect of oocyte morphology on embryo development and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online (2006) 12:608–615.[Web of Science][Medline]

Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC, et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarrary data. Nat Genet (2001) 29:365–371.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Brison DR, Houghton FD, Falconer D, Roberts SA, Hawkhead J, Humpherson PG, Lieberman BA, Leese HJ. Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover. Hum Reprod (2004) 19:2319–2324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bromer JG, Seli E. Assessment of embryo viability in assisted reproductive technology: shortcomings of current approaches and the emerging role of metabolomics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol (2008) 20:234–241.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Courtois G, Smahi A. NF-kappaB-related genetic diseases. Cell Death Differ (2006) 13:843–851.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

de Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics (2004) 20:1453–1454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1998) 95:14863–14868.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fenwick J, Platteau P, Murdoch AP, Herbert M. Time from insemination to first cleavage predicts developmental competence of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Hum Reprod (2002) 17:407–412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feuerstein P, Cadoret V, Dalbies-Tran R, Guerif F, Bidault R, Royere D. Gene expression in human cumulus cells: one approach to oocyte competence. Hum Reprod (2007) 22:3069–3077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential. Fertil Steril (2001) 76:1175–1180.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gasca S, Pellestor F, Assou S, Loup V, Anahory T, Dechaud H, De Vos J, Hamamah S. Identifying new human oocyte marker genes: a microarray approach. Reprod Biomed Online (2007) 14:175–183.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hamel M, Dufort I, Robert C, Gravel C, Leveille MC, Leader A, Sirard MA. Identification of differentially expressed markers in human follicular cells associated with competent oocytes. Hum Reprod (2008) 23:1118–1127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haouzi D, De Vos J, Loup V, Assou S, Gasca S, Reyftmann L, Klein B, Hamamah S. Oocyte and embryo quality: do the apoptotic markers have a place in the preimplantation genetic diagnostic? Gynecol Obstet Fertil (2008) 36:730–742.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

He B, Chadburn A, Jou E, Schattner EJ, Knowles DM, Cerutti A. Lymphoma B cells evade apoptosis through the TNF family members BAFF/BLyS and APRIL. J Immunol (2004) 172:3268–3279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kolena J, Kiss A, Channing CP. Purification of porcine granulosa cells by continuous Percoll gradient. Experientia (1983) 39:908–909.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kovalevsky G, Patrizio P. High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States. Fertil Steril (2005) 84:325–330.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

La Sala GB, Nicoli A, Villani MT, Di Girolamo R, Capodanno F, Blickstein I. The effect of selecting oocytes for insemination and transferring all resultant embryos without selection on outcomes of assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril (2008) In press.

Lee KS, Joo BS, Na YJ, Yoon MS, Choi OH, Kim WW. Cumulus cells apoptosis as an indicator to predict the quality of oocytes and the outcome of IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet (2001) 18:490–498.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lundin K, Bergh C, Hardarson T. Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF. Hum Reprod (2001) 16:2652–2657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McKenzie LJ, Pangas SA, Carson SA, Kovanci E, Cisneros P, Buster JE, Amato P, Matzuk MM. Human cumulus granulosa cell gene expression: a predictor of fertilization and embryo selection in women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod (2004) 19:2869–2874.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pearson H. Safer embryo tests could boost IVF pregnancy rates. Nature (2006) 444:12–13.[Medline]

Perlman S, Bouquin T, van den Hazel B, Jensen TH, Schambye HT, Knudsen S, Okkels JS. Transcriptome analysis of FSH and FSH variant stimulation in granulosa cells from IVM patients reveals novel regulated genes. Mol Hum Reprod (2006) 12:135–144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Rebar RW, Tasca RJ. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Dvelopment workshop. Obstet Gynecol (2007) 109:967–977.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Reme T, Hose D, De Vos J, Vassal A, Poulain PO, Pantesco V, Goldschmidt H, Klein B. A new method for class prediction based on signed-rank algorithms applied to Affymetrix microarray experiments. BMC Bioinformatics (2008) 9:16.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sakkas D, Gardner DK. Noninvasive methods to assess embryo quality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol (2005) 17:283–288.[Web of Science][Medline]

Sasson R, Dantes A, Tajima K, Amsterdam A. Novel genes modulated by FSH in normal and immortalized FSH-responsive cells: new insights into the mechanism of FSH action. Faseb J (2003) 17:1256–1266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sasson R, Rimon E, Dantes A, Cohen T, Shinder V, Land-Bracha A, Amsterdam A. Gonadotrophin-induced gene regulation in human granulosa cells obtained from IVF patients. Modulation of steroidogenic genes, cytoskeletal genes and genes coding for apoptotic signalling and protein kinases. Mol Hum Reprod (2004) 10:299–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scott L, Alvero R, Leondires M, Miller B. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum Reprod (2000) 15:2394–2403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seli E, Sakkas D, Scott R, Kwok SC, Rosendahl SM, Burns DH. Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using Raman and near-infrared spectroscopy correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril (2007) 88:1350–1357.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril (2004) 81:1207–1220.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Steele-Perkins G, Plachez C, Butz KG, Yang G, Bachurski CJ, Kinsman SL, Litwack ED, Richards LJ, Gronostajski RM. The transcription factor gene Nfib is essential for both lung maturation and brain development. Mol Cell Biol (2005) 25:685–698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stein JV, Lopez-Fraga M, Elustondo FA, Carvalho-Pinto CE, Rodriguez D, Gomez-Caro R, De Jong J, Martinez AC, Medema JP, Hahne M. APRIL modulates B and T cell immunity. J Clin Invest (2002) 109:1587–1598.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Su YQ, Sugiura K, Wigglesworth K, O'Brien MJ, Affourtit JP, Pangas SA, Matzuk MM, Eppig JJ. Oocyte regulation of metabolic cooperativity between mouse cumulus cells and oocytes: BMP15 and GDF9 control cholesterol biosynthesis in cumulus cells. Development (2008) 135:111–121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sugiura K, Su YQ, Diaz FJ, Pangas SA, Sharma S, Wigglesworth K, O'Brien MJ, Matzuk MM, Shimasaki S, Eppig JJ. Oocyte-derived BMP15 and FGFs cooperate to promote glycolysis in cumulus cells. Development (2007) 134:2593–2603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2001) 98:5116–5121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Montfoort AP, Dumoulin JC, Kester AD, Evers JL. Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod (2004) 19:2103–2108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van Montfoort AP, Geraedts JP, Dumoulin JC, Stassen AP, Evers JL, Ayoubi TA. Differential gene expression in cumulus cells as a prognostic indicator of embryo viability: a microarray analysis. Mol Hum Reprod (2008) 14:157–168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang WJ, Hwu YM, Lee RK, Li SH, Lin SY, Fleming S. Early cleavage does not predict treatment outcome following the use of GnRH antagonists in women older than 35. Fertil Steril (2007) 88:1573–1578.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zhang X, Jafari N, Barnes RB, Confino E, Milad M, Kazer RR. Studies of gene expression in human cumulus cells indicate pentraxin 3 as a possible marker for oocyte quality. Fertil Steril (2005) 83(Suppl. 1):1169–1179.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zhu XM, Zhu YM, Xu CM, Qian YL, Jin F, Huang HF. Autologous mature follicular fluid: its role in in vitro maturation of human cumulus-removed oocytes. Fertil Steril (2008) 90:1094–1102.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Submitted on August 15, 2008; resubmitted on November 6, 2008; accepted on November 6, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. G. Hillier
Paracrine support of ovarian stimulation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 15(12): 843 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. A. Edson, A. K. Nagaraja, and M. M. Matzuk
The Mammalian Ovary from Genesis to Revelation
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2009; 30(6): 624 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R A Anderson, R Sciorio, H Kinnell, R A L Bayne, K J Thong, P A de Sousa, and S Pickering
Cumulus gene expression as a predictor of human oocyte fertilisation, embryo development and competence to establish a pregnancy
Reproduction, October 1, 2009; 138(4): 629 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/12/711    most recent
gan067v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assou, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hamamah, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assou, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hamamah, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?