Skip Navigation


Mol. Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 10, 2008
Molecular Human Reproduction 2008 14(8):465-474; doi:10.1093/molehr/gan041
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/8/465    most recent
gan041v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Luk, J. M.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Luk, J. M.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Characterization of an acrosome protein VAD1.2/AEP2 which is differentially expressed in spermatogenesis

Kai-Fai Lee1,2,6, Yuen-Tsung Tam1, Yan Zuo1, Ana W.Y. Cheong1, Ronald T.K. Pang1, Nikki P.Y. Lee3, Cathy K.Y. Shum3, Po-Chor Tam3, Annie N.Y. Cheung4, Zeng-Ming Yang5, William S.B. Yeung1,2 and John M.C. Luk3,6

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, PR China 2Center of Reproduction, Development and Growth, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, PR China 3Department of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, PR China 4Department of Pathology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, PR China 5Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Cell Biology and Tumor Cell Engineering, College of Life Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, PR China

6 Correspondence address. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, PR China. Fax: +852-28161947; E-mail: ckflee{at}hkucc.hku.hk (K-F.L.); jmluk{at}hkucc.hku.hk (J.M.C.L.)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The release of enzymes from the acrosome of the sperm head (acrosome reaction) starts the fertilization process and enables the spermatozoa to penetrate the zona pellucida of the oocytes. Defective acrosome reaction is one of the important causes of infertility in men. To investigate the molecular regulation of spermatogenesis in vivo, we used differential display reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction to identify stage-specific genes in a retinol-supplemented vitamin-A deficiency (VAD) rat model and identified the VAD1.2 (acrosome-expressed protein 2, AEP2) gene, which was expressed strongly in the rat testis from post-natal day 32 to adult stage. The mouse VAD1.2 mRNA shared 85% and 67% sequence homology, and 74% and 38% amino acid homology, respectively, with the rat and human counterparts. VAD1.2 transcript was abundantly expressed in the rat seminiferous tubules at stage VIII–XII, and the protein was detected in the acrosome region of the round and elongated spermatids of mouse, human, monkey and pig. VAD1.2 co-localized with lectin-PNA to the acrosome region of spermatids. Interestingly, the expression of VAD1.2 protein in human testis diminished in patients with hypospermatogenesis, maturation arrest, undescended testis and Sertoli cell-only syndrome. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments followed by western blotting and mass spectrometry (MS–MS) identified syntaxin 1, β-actin and myosin heavy chain (MHC) proteins as putative interacting partners. Taken together, the stage-specific expression of VAD1.2 in the acrosome of spermatids and the binding of VAD1.2 protein with vesicle forming (syntaxin 1) and structural (β-actin and MHC) proteins suggest that VAD1.2 maybe involved in acrosome formation during spermiogenesis.

Key words: spermatogenesis/acrosome/golgi apparatus/syntaxin/β-actin


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Spermatogenesis is a process in which undifferentiated germ cells undergo mitotic and meiotic divisions, followed by a dramatic morphological re-organization to generate spermatozoa that are capable of fertilizing the oocytes (Johnson et al., 1970). Maturation and differentiation of male germ cells occur in a cyclic manner within the seminiferous tubules (Russell et al., 1990). In rats, there are 14 spermatogenic stages (I–XIV), with each stage composing of a specific complement of male germ cells that are represented by a unique gene expression profile. Furthermore, spermatogenesis involves nuclear and cytoplasmic re-organizations, and many proteins are transiently or temporally expressed in a particular stage of the spermatogenic cycle (Cheng and Mruk, 2002). Defective spermatogenesis is one of the important causes of human infertility that may result in oligospermia (low sperm production), azoospermia (no sperm production), asthenozoospermia (poor sperm motility) or teratozoospermia (abnormal sperm morphology).

The acrosome is an enzyme-filled vesicle that is required for the sperm–oocyte penetration and binding (Eddy and O’Brien, 1994). It contains glycohydrolases, proteases, esterases, acid phosphatases and aryl sulfatases (Abou-Haila and Tulsiani, 2000) that facilitate the fertilization process in vivo. The acrosome is formed from the Golgi-derived apparatus in the initial steps of spermiogenesis, a term used to describe the morphologic transformation from a round spermatid to a mature spermatozoon. During the process of acrosome formation, the Golgi complex engenders the vesicles to form a cap-like structure in the proximity of the nucleus. Gene inactivation studies have identified a number of genes that are important for acrosome formation and function including Golgi-associated PDZ- and coiled-coil motif-containing protein (GOPC) (Yao et al., 2002), Tnp2 (Adham et al., 2001) and Hrb (Kang-Decker et al., 2001).

In spite of the well-defined physiological and developmental events, the underlying molecular mechanisms that govern spermatogenesis remain largely unknown, partly due to the presence of different spermatogenic stages within the testes at all times, making the study of any specific spermatogenic stage difficult. Different approaches have been developed to study the molecular changes of spermatogenesis, including isolation of germ cells at specific spermatogenic stages from a normal testis. However, this method is extremely tedious and technically challenging. Synchronization of spermatogenesis in testis can be carried out by feeding the animals with a vitamin-A deficient (VAD) diet, and this approach has been used to study spermatogenesis in adult rat and mouse. Vitamin A is important for the proper function of a number of biological processes, such as vision, reproduction, cellular growth and differentiation, embryonic development and immune response (Napoli, 1996; Akmal et al., 1998; White et al., 2000). Male rats fed with a VAD diet for 2 months exhibit spermatogenic arrest with seminiferous tubules containing only Sertoli cells, spermatogonia and some spermatocytes (Mitranond et al., 1979; Unni et al., 1983). Spermatogenesis in these rats can be reinitiated by administration of retinol, resulting in the formation of a synchronized epithelium (Morales and Griswold, 1987; van Pelt and de Rooij, 1991).

We have used the VAD model and mRNA differential display to study gene regulation in spermatogenesis and have identified a number of novel genes (Luk et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2004). Twelve differentially expressed cDNA fragments shared sequence homology with molecules involved in various biological processes including membrane channel and transport, transcription and translation, cell cycling and morphogenesis (Luk et al., 2003). Previously, we reported the cloning and functional characterization of VAD1.3/AEP1 (Acrosome-expressed protein 1) from rat testis. The AEP1 gene is located on mouse chromosome 13B3 and it encodes a protein of 1024 amino acids that interacts with β-actin in the rat testis (Luk et al., 2006). Here, we report the molecular characterization of VAD1.2 expression and provide evidence on the interaction of the VAD1.2 protein with other vesicle forming and/or structural proteins present in human, rat and mouse testis during spermiogenesis and acrosome formation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Animals
Animals were obtained from the AAALAC accredited Laboratory Animal Unit of The University of Hong Kong, and fed with normal standard chow and water ad libitum. All the experiments were approved and conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines set forth by University’s Committee on Using Live Animals for Teaching and Research.

Human samples
A set of 25 biopsy samples of the testis were retrieved from the Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. The biopsies were performed for investigation of male infertility in 20 patients, whereas removal of the undescended testis was conducted in five patients. The patients’ age ranged from 13 to 45 (mean = 35.24). Tissues were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Spermatogenesis in these patients was classified as normal (n = 5), hypospermatogenesis (n = 5), maturation arrest (n = 5), undescended testis (n = 5) and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS; n = 5) during histological examination by a pathologist. Usages of archival clinical specimens were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.

Cell isolation and RNA extraction
Germ cells were isolated by a mechanical procedure and used within 3 h after isolation as described (Luk et al., 2006). Epididymal sperm were obtained by gentle squeezing of the epididymis. Sertoli cells were isolated and cultured as described (Luk et al., 2003) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air (v/v) and 5% CO2 (v/v) for 36 h. The culture was hypotonically treated with 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4) for 2.5 min to eliminate residual germ cells and the Sertoli cells were allowed to recover for 24 h before RNA extraction. Total RNA from testes was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instruction, and subjected to DNase I treatment. The quality of RNA was determined by running a RNA gel to examine for the integrity of 18S and 28S RNA bands of each sample. Purity and concentration of RNA were determined by spectrophotometric measurement of UV absorbance at 260 and 280 nm.

Rapid amplification of cDNA ends
The full-length cDNA sequence of VAD1.2 was obtained by Rapid amplification of cDNA end (RACE) using the mouse (Mus musculus BALB/c strain) testis cDNA library. Gene-specific forward (5'-GGT GGG GGC TCT GTC CTT CCT AAC T-3') and reverse (5'-GCA GCA TGG GGG TGA CAG GTA TCA G-3') primers were designed based on the sequence of mouse VAD1.2 (GenBank acc. no.: DQ118647 [GenBank] ), which was obtained using the partial sequence from mRNA differential display in a previous study (Luk et al., 2003) as a query in a nucleotide–nucleotide BLAST (blastn) search. 5'- and 3'-RACE were carried out using the corresponding gene specific primers and adaptor primer 1 (AP1) (5'-CCA TCC TAA TAC GAC TCA CTA TAG GGC-3') provided in Marathon cDNA Amplification Kit (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting 5'- and 3'-RACE products were cloned into pCR4 TOPO vector of the TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) for DNA sequencing. Sequencing reactions were carried out using the ABI Prism BigDye Terminators v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with M13 and T7 primers and the ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) as previously described (Lee et al., 2001).

Northern blot analysis
The northern blot probe was produced using forward (5'-AGC ATG GGG GTG ACA GGT ATC AGT A-3') and reverse (5'-TGT CTA GTC ATT TCT CTG GGG C-3') primers in a standard PCR reaction, which yielded a 990 bp DNA probe. A 25 ng sample of this DNA probe was used directly after radiolabeling with 5 µl of [{alpha}-32P]-dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA) using the Ready-To-GoTM DNA Labeling Beads (Amersham). Commercial rat multi-tissue Northern blots (Seegene, Seoul, Korea) were first pre-hybridized using the Rapid-hyb buffer (Amersham) at 65°C for 1 h and then subjected to hybridization with the radioactive DNA probe (1 x 106 cpm) for an additional 16 h. After washing in two different stringency wash buffers (2x SSC, 0.1% SDS or 1x SSC, 0.1% SDS) at room temperature or at 65°C, the membranes were exposed to BioMax autoradiography films (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) for 4 days at –80°C. The films were developed using an AGFA film processor (AGFA, Mortsel, Belgium) to visualize the signals.

Semi-quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction
Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) was performed with modifications (Lee et al., 2006). The same primer sequences reported in our earlier study (Luk et al., 2003) were used. In brief, RT was performed using oligo(dT)12–18 primer (Invitrogen) and MMLV reverse transcriptase (Promega) and rat testis RNA. The resulting RT products were used as templates in the subsequent PCR. To start with, 2.5 µl of RT products were combined with each of the forward (5'-ATC CAG GTA AAG AGC AAG CAA CAT T-3') and reverse (5'-ACA GCC TAC AGA CAG CCT TAG AAA A-3') primers of VAD1.2, 1x PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dNTPs and 1 U of AmpliTaq Gold DNA Polymerase (Applied Biosystems), and sterile water to a final reaction volume of 50 µl. The cycling parameters for PCR were as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 7 min, which was followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 50°C for 45 s and 72°C for 60 s in a 96-well GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosystems). Amplification of GAPDH (forward primer: 5'-ACC ACA GTC GCC ATC AC-3'; reverse primer: 5'-TCC ACC ACC CTG TTG CTG-3') was done in parallel experiments to ensure that equal amount of templates were used for different samples in the same experiments. A negative control was performed without adding reverse transcriptase to the RT reaction. Experiments were performed at least twice using samples isolated from individual rats and mice and representative results were shown.

In situ hybridization
The localization of VAD1.2 mRNA in testes was performed by in situ hybridization (ISH) as described with modifications (Lee et al., 2006). In brief, VAD1.2-specific antisense and sense RNA probes based on the sequence corresponding to nucleotides 77–1087 bp (GenBank acc. no.: DQ118647 [GenBank] ) were synthesized using the Riboprobe Combination System-SP6/T7 RNA polymerase (Promega), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The samples were prepared by fixing post-natal rat and mouse testes in 10% buffered formalin and embedding in paraffin. Sections, 4 µm thick, were prepared from these samples. Subsequently, both sense and antisense VAD1.2-specific probes were used to carry out the hybridization utilizing the mRNAlocator In Situ Hybridization Kit (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instruction. RNase A-resistant hybrids were detected after 1–2 weeks of autoradiography using Kodak NTB-2 (Amersham) liquid emulsion. The slides were post-stained with hematoxylin. Tissues were examined with a Zeiss Axioskop microscope (Photometrics Sensys, Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ, USA) under bright- and dark-field optics.

Immunohistochemistry and western blotting
Antibodies against VAD1.2 were raised from two rabbits immunized with the keyhole limpet hemocyanin-conjugated VAD1.2 peptide (NM_001005531.1: CCGT KKG TPI LLK IHF KLS SPQ-AMIDE, 325–344 amino acids) by ZYMED Laboratory Inc. (South San Francisco, CA, USA). This peptide sequence is unique to VAD1.2 in the protein database. The antibodies were affinity purified with VAD1.2 peptide column. The antibody titers were measured by a standard ELISA method. Dilutions of the antibody stock (0.5 mg/ml) at 1:100 and 1:2000 were made for immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis, respectively. For immunohistochemistry, testes were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and paraffin-embedded. Paraffin sections, 4 µm thick, were prepared for immunohistochemistry as described (Luk et al., 2006). After dewaxing and rehydration in xylene and ethanol, the sections were microwaved for 15 min in the Target Retrieval Solution (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA). After peroxidase blocking in 3% H2O2, the sample sections were incubated with 10% normal goat serum in PBS to block non-specific binding sites. Sections were subsequently incubated in 5 µg/ml of affinity-purified rabbit anti-VAD1.2 primary antibody overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber. Biotin-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody followed by Vectastain ABC kit (Vector laboratory, Burlingame, CA, USA) was used for immunohistochemistry. Positive signals were visualized using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine under a Nikon epifluorescent upright microscope E600 (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and images were captured with a CCD camera DC-330 (DAGE-MTI, Michigan City, IN). Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody was used in fluorescent microscopy. PNA conjugated with Alexa Fluor-488 (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used for acrosome staining. For western blot analysis, horse-radish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody was used, and the specific signal was visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) method.

Co-immunoprecipitation
Protein–protein interactions of VAD1.2 in testis were carried out by co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Frozen mouse and rat testis were grinded into powder with the use of liquid nitrogen. RIPA buffer (1 ml) containing protease inhibitor was added to the pulverized tissue and vortexed to dissolve the protein. The mixtures were then centrifuged at 10 000g for 10 min to remove the cell debris and the supernatants were collected. Endogenous IgG present in the testis lysates was removed by protein-G beads. Then, 20 µg of anti-VAD1.2 antibody was added to each sample and incubated on a rotary shaker at 4°C overnight. After that, 80 µl of protein-G beads in 80 µl of PBS was added to each sample and incubated for 3 h at 4°C. The samples were centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min to pellet the beads. The beads were then washed with RIPA buffer for five times. An equal volume of PBS was then added to each sample. Control groups included raw mouse and rat testis lysate in RIPA buffer, the pre-cleaned protein-G protein fraction, the supernatant collected in the last step and the anti-VAD1.2 antibody alone. All the samples were subjected to 95°C denaturation for 5 min in 1x SDS loading buffer. After boiling, the samples were resolved in 12% SDS–PAGE and used for western blotting. Normal IgG from rabbit (DakoCytomation) and antibodies against β-actin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), syntaxin 1 (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and cyclophilin B (Santa Cruz) were used at 1:1000, 1:5000, 1:1000 and 1:1000 dilution, respectively.

Protein identification by peptide mass fingerprinting
Protein bands of interest were excised from the SDS–PAGE gels and washed with milli-Q water. Silver stain was removed with a freshly prepared mixture of 100 mM of sodium thiosulfate and 30 mM of potassium ferricyanide (III) in a ratio of 1:1. Then, the gel pieces were washed with milli-Q water containing 50% methanol, 10% acetic acid and 25 mM NH4HCO3. The protein was reduced and alkylated with 10 mM of DTT, 50 mM of iodoacetic acid in 25 mM of NH4HCO3 and washed with 25 mM of NH4HCO3 and finally dehydrated with 80% acetonitrile in 25 mM of NH4HCO3. After drying, the gel pieces were rehydrated with digestion buffer (25 mM of NH4HCO3, pH 8.0) containing 50 ng of sequencing grade trypsin (Sigma). Digestion was carried out at 37°C overnight. The peptides were then purified with Zip-C18 tips (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The peptides were spotted on a sample plate and overlaid with {alpha}-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as matrix. All of the samples were detected by the Applied BioSystems 4800 MALDI-TOF/TOFTM Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) in the Genome Research Center, The University of Hong Kong. The data were automatically analyzed using the GPS Explorer (version 3.5) (Applied Biosystems). For each digest, a combined MS and MS/MS analysis was performed with the Mascot search engine (version 2.2 Matrix Science) using 75 ppm MS peptide tolerance and 0.3 Da MS/MS tolerance. Searches allowed for fixed carbamidomethylated cysteine and variable methionine oxidation with no other post-translational modifications taken into consideration.

Bioinformatics analysis
Bioinformatics analysis was carried out using the following softwares and programs: sequence similarities of cDNA and protein were examined using NCBI BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast) and Ensembl BLAST search from Wellcome Trust/EBI Sanger Institute (http://www.ensembl.org/Multi/blastview). Amino acid sequence alignments among different species of VAD1.2 were constructed using CLUSTALW (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/ClustalW.html) and BoxShade (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html) programs. The protein sequence was further analyzed using Similar Molecular Architecture Research Tool (SMART) (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/), Prosite from Expert Protein Analysis System (ExPASy) of the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) (http://www.expasy.org/prosite/) and Transmembrane prediction program (TMpred) (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Our initial query of rat VAD1.2 sequence (AF473841 [GenBank] ) identified homologous sequences in rat, mouse (AL662804 [GenBank] ) and human (hypothetical protein FLJ25414 mRNA, NM_001005531) from GenBank database on chromosome 10q32.1, 11E1 and 17q21.31, respectively. The full-length cDNA sequence of mouse VAD1.2 was cloned by RACE from the testis library of BALB/c strain. It had a genomic size of 10.2 kb and was composed of five exons of 13–785 nucleotides in length. VAD1.2 transcript from C57BL/6 and BALB/c strains shared 98% sequence homology (with variations in the 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions), whereas their protein sequences were identical. On the other hand, the rat and the mouse VAD1.2 transcript shared ~84–85% sequence homology with each other (Fig. 1A). The mouse and rat VAD1.2 transcript shared 67–70% and 65% sequence homology, respectively, with that of human. The protein sequence of mouse VAD1.2 shared 74% and 38% homology with that of rat and human, respectively. The homology between human and rat VAD1.2 was 39% (Fig. 1A).


Figure 1
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1: Bioinformatics analysis of the cloned mouse VAD1.2 and the homologs in other species.

(A) Score table illustrated the nucleotide and amino acid percentage homology of the cloned mouse VAD1.2 (Mus musculus BALB/c, acc. no.: DQ118647 [GenBank] ), published mouse (Mus musculus C57/BL6, acc. no.: NM_177801.2), rat (Rattus norvegicus, acc. no.: NM_001005531.1) and human (Homo sapiens, acc. no.: NM_152343.1) VAD1.2. (B) Amino acid sequences of VAD1.2 from rat (acc. no.: NP_001005531.1), mouse (acc. no.: NP_808469 [GenBank] ), human (acc. no.: NP_689556.1), chimpanzee (acc. no.: XP_511568 [GenBank] .1), macaque (acc. no.: BAB63104 [GenBank] .1) and bovine (AAI12606 [GenBank] ) were aligned and two highly conserved amino acid regions (boxed) were found. Furthermore, a histidine-rich region (a. a., 26–35 of the mouse sequence) was located adjacent to the glutamic acid-rich region (spanning amino acid 36–109) in the rodent species. Potential transmembrane regions were located at amino acids 33–53 and 222–242.

 
The predicted mouse VAD1.2 protein (NP_808469 [GenBank] ) was compared with its corresponding counterpart from rat (NP_001005531), human (NP_689556 [GenBank] ), macaque (BAB63104 [GenBank] .1), bovine (AAI12606 [GenBank] ) and chimpanzee (XP_511568 [GenBank] ) (Fig. 1B). Mouse VAD1.2 encoded a protein of 334 amino acids, with a predicted molecular weight of 37 kDa. Two highly conserved regions at amino acid position 120–140 and 190–200 were identified among different mammalian species (Fig. 1B). A prosite search on post-translation modification domain revealed a potential N-glycosylation site and several potential sites for phosphorylations, including 2 tyrosine, 18 serine and 10 threonine phosphorylation sites, suggesting that the VAD1.2 protein is a target for a panel of kinases. Motif scan results identified a histidine-rich region (amino acid 26–35, HHRHHHHH) in conjunction with a neighboring glutamic acid-rich region (amino acid 36–109) at the proximal site. However, both the histidine-rich and glutamic acid-rich regions were only found in mouse and rat VAD1.2 sequences, and not in the other four species studied (Fig. 1B). Potential transmembrane regions were located at amino acids 33–53 and 222–242 in mouse, as well as in rat, chimpanzee and macaque sequences, suggesting that VAD1.2 may be a membrane bound protein.

Northern blotting demonstrated that a VAD1.2 transcript of size ~1.2 kb was abundantly expressed in the rat (Fig. 2A) and mouse testes (data not shown). Using a more sensitive semi-quantitative RT–PCR analysis on 14 mouse tissues, VAD1.2 mRNA was shown to be highly expressed in the testis and weakly in the brain, hearts and 17-day embryos (Fig. 2B). We have previously reported that VAD1.2 transcript was present only in Day 25 VAD–PVA rat testes by semi-quantitative RT–PCR (Luk et al., 2003). In this study, VAD1.2 transcript was absent from post-natal day (PND) 0 to 15 when no round spermatids were found. VAD1.2 transcript was marginally detected on PND 25 and increased significantly from PND 32 to adult stage in rat testes. The analysis of the dispersed cells from adult testis indicated that the germ cells, but not the Sertoli cells, expressed VAD1.2 transcripts (Fig. 2C).


Figure 2
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2: Expression of VAD1.2 RNA in rat and mouse tissues.

(A) The expression of VAD1.2 transcript in different rat organs was studied by northern blot. The membrane was hybridized with radioactive labeled cDNA probe prepared as described in Materials and Methods. A band of ~1.2 kb in size corresponding to VAD1.2 transcript was found in the testis sample. (B) cDNA panel analysis of the VAD1.2 in mouse tissues. The amplified PCR products from the mouse ovary, oviduct and multiple tissue cDNA panels (MTC I and II) were resolved in 2% agarose gel. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by UV illumination. The VAD1.2 gene was highly expressed in mouse testis and weakly expressed in brain, heart and 17 day embryo. (C) The VAD1.2 transcript was found to be expressed on Day 32 onward in the post-natal rat testis. A strong expression of VAD1.2 was found in germ cells but not in Sertoli cells. A single band of 653 bp denoted VAD1.2. GAPDH (452 bp) was used as an internal control for ensuring equal sample loading (B and C).

 
Strong VAD1.2 transcript signal was found to be localized to the adluminal compartment of the seminiferous epithelium on PND 35 of the rat testis, by ISH using full-length VAD1.2 transcript as the antisense probe. No specific signal was found on PND 15 and 25 (Fig. 3A-H). The spatiotemporal expression of VAD1.2 transcripts coincided with the formation of round and elongated spermatids in the adult rat testes at stages VIII–X (Fig. 3C and D). No signal was found in the Leydig cells and spermatogonial cells of the testis. No detectable signal was found when a sense probe was used on rat testis (data not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3: Localization of VAD1.2 transcripts and proteins in the testes.

(AF) 35S-labeled VAD1.2 cRNA was used to detect VAD1.2 transcript in rat testes on PND 25 (A and E), 35 (B and F) and adult stage (C and G, D and H). VAD1.2 transcripts were strongly expressed in the lumen of the testis on Day 35. Top panels are the bright-field images (A–D) and the bottom panels are the dark-field images (E–H). VAD1.2 transcripts were differentially expressed in the seminiferous tubules of the adult rodent testes. The expression of VAD1.2 transcript was strongest at stage X. Enlarged images for C and G are shown in D and H, respectively. VAD1.2 protein was strongly detected at PND 35 (J) and 45 (K), but not at Day 25 (I). The signal could be clearly detected in the seminiferous tubules of the adult testis (L) and localized at the acrosomal region of the round and elongated spermatids (L, insert). VAD1.2 expression was also found at the acrosomal region of the mouse (M), human (N), monkey (O) and pig (P) spermatids. No signal could be detected in the Sertoli and Leydig cells of the testis. Magnification: A–C, E–G, I–P, x200; D, H and inserts, x400.

 
The amino acid 325–344 of the rat VAD1.2 sequence (CGTKKGTPILLKIHFKLSSPQ-AMIDE) was used to raise the VAD1.2 antibody from rabbits. The antibody was used to detect VAD1.2 protein expression in rat testes at PND 25, 35, 45 and adult stage (Fig. 3I–L). The expression of VAD1.2 was mainly found at the acrosome region of round and elongated spermatids from PND 35, but not in Sertoli or Leydig cells of the adult testis. VAD1.2 expression was also found at the acrosome region of spermatids in mouse, human, monkey and pig (Fig. 3M–P).

In the rat testis, VAD1.2 immunoreactivity was located peripheral to the nucleus with a predominately polar orientation, consistent with the locations of the acrosome. The signal was weakly detected in the haploid round spermatids at stage V, increased through stages VIII–X during the formation of round and elongated spermatids but decreased significantly in the mature spermatozoa (Fig. 4A–F). These results indicate that VAD1.2 protein is specifically expressed in the acrosome region of round and elongated spermatids at stages VIII–X. To confirm the expression of VAD1.2 in the acrosome of rat germ cells, lectin-PNA, which specifically stains the acrosome of germ cells, was used in the co-localization study (Fig. 4G–J). Lectin-PNA stained positively on the acrosomal region of spermatids and spermatozoa. The signal was co-localized with VAD1.2 in the round and elongated spermatids. In line with this, VAD1.2 was located at the acrosome region of isolated elongated spermatids (Fig. 4K), but weakly in the epididymal sperm in the cauda region (Fig. 4L). No immunostaining of cauda sperm was found when the primary antibody was omitted (Fig. 4M).


Figure 4
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4: Stage-specific expression of VAD1.2 protein in rat testes.

In a rat spermatogenic cycle, the expression of VAD1.2 protein in the testis starts at the round spermatid stage (AF), and the signal increases when the acrosome forms. In mature sperm, VAD1.2 signal was very weak or undetectable. The expression of VAD1.2 in the acrosomes of the rat spermatids were revealed by lectin PNA staining. VAD1.2 was visualized using Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (G, red immunofluorescence) and lectin PNA-conjugated was detected with Alexa Fluor-488 (H, green immunofluorescence). The nuclei were stained blue with DAPI (I). The co-localization signals were revealed by the yellow immunofluorescence (J, arrow) in the merged image. VAD1.2 was present in the acrosome of testicular elongated spermatids (K) but weakly stained in epididymal sperm (L, arrow). No signal was found when the primary antibody was omitted (M). Sc, spermatocytes; St, spermatids; Sp, spermatozoa. Magnification: x400 (A–J), x1000 (K–M).

 
We examined the expression of VAD1.2 in association with different clinical conditions in human testes, i.e. testis with normal spermatogenesis (Fig. 5A and B), hypospermatogenesis (Fig. 5C and D) and maturation arrest (Fig. 5E and F), undescended testes (Fig. 5G and H), as well as SCOS testes (Fig. 5I and J) by immunohistochemistry. In testes with normal spermatogenesis, VAD1.2 protein expression was predominantly observed in the acrosomal cap of spermatids. The expression of VAD1.2 was decreased in testes with hypospermatogenesis and maturation arrested. In contrast, there was no detectable VAD1.2 expression in the seminiferous tubules of the undescended and SCOS testis when spermatogenesis was abolished (Fig. 5G–J).


Figure 5
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5: VAD1.2 expression in human testes.

Immunohistochemistry was performed to reveal the localization and expression of VAD1.2 in human testes with normal spermatogenesis (A and B), hypospermatogenesis (C and D), maturation arrest (E and F), undecended testis (G and H) and SCOS (I and J). Higher magnification of the seminiferous tubules is shown on the right (B, D, F, H and J). Sc, spermatocytes; St, spermatids. Magnification, x200 (A, C, E, G and I), x400 (B, D, F, H and J).

 
Co-immunoprecipitation was performed to determine the protein(s) associated with VAD1.2 in the testis (Fig. 6A). The pull-down proteins were identified using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) after gel elution. Mascot search identified myosin heavy chain (MHC) and β-actin as putative VAD1.2 binding proteins (Table I). The affinity-purified anti-VAD1.2 antibody detected two bands of size ~100 and 120 kDa in western blotting using mouse testis lysates suggesting that VAD1.2 protein is post-translationally modified. Bioinformatics analysis showed that VAD1.2 had one potential glycosylation site and 30 potential phosporylation sites. In rat epididymal sperm, VAD1.2 gave a band of around 100 kDa in size. These anti-VAD1.2 antibody identified signals could be nullified with excessive VAD1.2 peptide, suggesting that the signals were specific for VAD1.2 (Fig. 6B). Western blotting of the co-immunoprecipitated products detected β-actin and syntaxin 1 as VAD1.2 interacting partners in mouse, rat and human testis lysates. No pull-down signal was detected when normal IgG and cyclophilin B antibodies were used in western blotting (Fig. 6C).


Figure 6
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6: VAD1.2 co-immunoprecipitates syntaxin 1 and β-actin in testis lysates.

(A) Silver staining of the co-immunoprecipitated (co-IP) products was performed after separation by SDS–PAGE. Discrete protein bands (arrowheads) were excised and subjected to MS analysis. (B) Expression VAD1.2 protein in rat epididymal sperm (Epi), mouse and rat testis lysates by western blotting. The specific signals (100 and 120 kDa, arrows) were neutralized with VAD1.2 peptide. The loading of the samples were normalized with cyclophilin B protein (bottom). (C) Western blotting of the co-immunoprecipitated protein using normal IgG (IgG), VAD1.2, syntaxin 1, β-actin and cyclophilin B antibodies. A doublet band was observed when VAD1.2 antibody was used. It is speculated that they are phosphorylated forms of VAD1.2 protein in the testis. The panel on the left showed longer exposure time of the mouse, rat and human testis lysates. Syntaxin 1 and β-actin, but not cyclophilin B, were detected in the VAD1.2 co-immunoprecipitated (VAD1.2 IP) complexes. Mo T, mouse testis; Ra T, rat testis; Hu T, human testis.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table I. Identification of VAD1.2 co-immunoprecipitated proteins by MALDI-TOF MS.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In this study, we isolated the full-length VAD1.2 cDNA from the mouse testis cDNA library. The VAD1.2 gene (Acc. no.: DQ118647 [GenBank] ) is transcribed into a 1.2 kb mRNA encoding a protein with 334 amino acids and is located on chromosome 11E1. Prosite search on post-translation modification domain revealed a potential glycosylation and several tyrosine, serine and threonine phosphorylation sites, suggesting VAD1.2 protein could be a substrate for a panel of kinases. Indeed, native rat VAD1.2 protein exists in two forms in the testis and one form in the epididymis as shown by western blot analysis, suggesting that post-translational modification exists on VAD1.2 protein in vivo. Modification of cyritestin, an integral transmembrane protein of the mouse acrosome protein during epididymal transport has been reported (Linder et al., 1995). In fact, phosphorylation events are common in the testes and they participate in many core activities. Components of junctional complexes disassemble when their associated adaptors are phosphorylated, and subsequently dissociate from the complexes, enabling different processes in spermatogenesis, such as sperm release or junction opening (Mruk and Cheng, 2004; Lee and Cheng, 2004). Protein kinases, such as Src, Csk and Fyn, are localized predominantly to the adluminal compartment of the seminiferous epithelium in stages VII and VIII (Wine and Chapin, 1999; Maekawa et al., 2002; Lee and Cheng, 2005). These kinases may be the kinases capable of phosphorylating VAD1.2.

The presence of two putative transmembrane regions in VAD1.2 protein supports the notion that VAD1.2 may interact with other membrane bound molecules. As such, it is likely that VAD1.2 may have a role in organizing germ cell movement and cell–cell interactions during spermiogenesis. More interestingly, motif scan results illustrated the presence of a histidine-rich region (amino acid 26–35) in conjunction with a neighboring glutamic acid-rich region (amino acid 36–109) at the proximal site. The glutamic acid-rich region is known to form a coiled-coil structure (Lupas et al., 1991), which can be found in an array of proteins with diversified functions, such as structural skeletons and motor proteins (Burkhard et al., 2001). However, both the histidine-rich and glutamic acid-rich regions were only found in the mouse and rat VAD1.2, but not in the other four mammalian species. The implication of these regions in the functioning of VAD1.2 in rat and mouse is unknown, as they are not essential for any conserved functions among different species.

VAD1.2 was detected in the adluminal compartment coinciding to the sites of round and elongated spermatids in the seminiferous epithelium in rat and mouse testes. It was localized at the acrosome of spermatids at stages VIII–X of the seminiferous tubules in the rat testes. The specific spatiotemporal expression of VAD1.2 in post-natal and adult testis suggests that VAD1.2 may play an important role in acrosome formation and in maturation and differentiation of spermatids. The formation of acrosome can be divided into four phases, namely the Golgi phase, cap phase, acrosome phase and maturation phase (Abou-Haila and Tulsiani, 2000). Our results demonstrated that VAD1.2 was detected in the late cap phase in Step 7 round spermatids and early acrosome phase in Step 8 round spermatids. These localization data suggested a potential function of VAD1.2 in assisting the round spermatids to transit to the acrosome phase, transforming the round spermatids to elongated spermatids when the round spermatids start to flatten as a result of chromatin condensation and acrosome compaction (Abou-Haila and Tulsiani, 2000). These postulations should be further confirmed by immuno-electron microscopic studies.

VAD1.2 immunoreactivity is strongly detected in the acrosomal region of spermatids, but weakly or absent in other germ cell types such as spermatogonia and spermatozoa in the seminiferous tubules, suggestive of an involvement of VAD1.2 in acrosome formation. To date, gene inactivation studies have identified a number of genes that are important for acrosome formation and function. For example, deletion of mouse GOPC (Golgi-associated PDZ- and coiled-coil motif-containing protein) gene results in the formation of infertile round-headed spermatozoa with acrosome-less round heads and deformed tails (Yao et al., 2002). The germ cells of Tnp2 null males are capable of undergoing chromatin condensation, but many spermatozoa derived from them exhibit head abnormalities with acrosomes not attaching to the nuclear envelope (Adham et al., 2001). Male mice with a null mutation in the Hrb gene produce round-headed spermatozoa without an acrosome and are infertile. Hrb is associated with the cytosolic surface of pro-acrosomic transport vesicles which fuse to form a single large acrosomic vesicle during spermiogenesis. Deletion of Hrb suppresses the fusion of proacrosomic vesicles and blocks acrosomal development in the spermatids (Kang-Decker et al., 2001). As such, it is plausible that dysfunction of VAD1.2 may induce defects in germ cell formation leading to infertility. This possibility remains to be tested by gene inactivation experiments.

All mammalian spermatozoa possess an acrosome, an important organelle for fertilization. Therefore, it is not surprising that VAD1.2 immunoreactivity is present in the acrosome of spermatids in human, monkey, pig, rat and mouse and probably other untested mammalian species. These observations suggested that a conserved function of VAD1.2 molecule among mammalian species. In line with this, our immunohistochemical data suggested that the expression of VAD1.2 protein may be associated with spermatogenic failure in humans, since VAD1.2 expression was dysregulated or absent in seminiferous tubules with maturation arrest, and in undescended and SCOS testes. Notably, VAD1.2 signal appeared to accumulate in the spermatocytes of hypospermatogenic testis and was weakly detected in the seminiferous tubules of maturation arrested and undescended testis. Although, the pathological conditions of these patients may be counter-conducive to the normal expression of VAD1.2, it is plausible that VAD1.2 protein may play a direct role on acrosome formation during spermiogenesis.

Previously, we reported that VAD1.3/AEP1 interacts with β-actin, co-localized at the acrosome region of spermatids (Luk et al., 2006) and it also interacts with syntaxin 1 (unpublished data). In this study, we demonstrated that VAD1.2 also co-immunoprecipitated with syntaxin 1 in the mouse, rat and human testis lysates. Syntaxins 1, 2, 3 and 4 are found on the sperm plasma membrane (Jahn and Sudhof, 1999; Ramalho-Santos et al., 2002) and play an important role in regulating exocytosis and the acrosome reaction (Tomes et al., 2002). Moreover, we demonstrated by western blotting and MS/MS analysis that VAD1.2 interacted with β-actin in vitro. β-Actin has been detected at the acroplaxome in the rat elongating spermatids as well as in the ectoplasmic actin bundles of Sertoli cells by immunogold electron microscopy (Kierszenbaum et al., 2003, 2004). Moreover, MHC was also identified as one of the interacting partners of VAD1.2 by MS/MS analysis. In fact, actin-based myosin motors play a significant role in targeting vesicle cargos to subcellular compartments during sperm development (Kierszenbaum et al., 2003). Therefore, VAD1.2 may cooperate with β-actin and myosin molecules on vesicle transport in the formation of acrosome. Yet, details molecular interactions between these proteins await further investigations.

In summary, we have reported the cloning and characterization of a novel but conserved gene with expression confined mainly to the spermatids of mammalian testes. The special spatio-temporal expression pattern of VAD1.2 in the germ cells of testis in different animal species and the interaction of VAD1.2 protein with β-actin and MHC proteins in the testis lysates suggest that VAD1.2 may play an important role(s) on acrosome formation in spermatogenesis. We are currently carrying out functional study on VAD1.2 gene by using a conditional gene inactivation approach to address the biological role of VAD1.2 in spermatogenesis.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
This work was supported in part by The University of Hong Kong’s Committee on Research and Conference Grants and the Hong Kong Research Grant Council GRF HKU7272/01M to JML and HKU7537/05M and N_HKU712/06 to KFL.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The authors thank Pauline Leung, Brian Lam and Kar-Wai Leung for their excellent technical support.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Abou-Haila A, Tulsiani DRP. Mammalian sperm acrosome: formation, contents, and function. Arch Biochem Biophys (2000) 379:173–182.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Adham IM, Nayernia K, Burkhardt-Gottges E, Topaloglu O, Dixkens C, Holstein AF, Engel W. Teratozoospermia in mice lacking the transition protein 2 (Tnp2). Mol Hum Reprod (2001) 7:513–520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Akmal KM, Dufour JM, Vo M, Higginson S, Kim KH. Ligand-dependent regulation of retinoic acid receptor alpha in rat testis: in vivo response to depletion and repletion of vitamin A. Endocrinology (1998) 139:1239–1248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Burkhard P, Stetefeld J, Strelkov SV. Coiled coils: a highly versatile protein folding motif. Trends Cell Biol (2001) 11:82–88.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cheng CY, Mruk DD. Cell junction dynamics in the testis: Sertoli-germ cell interactions and male contraceptive development. Physiol Rev (2002) 82:825–874.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eddy EM, O’Brien DA. The Physiology of Reproduction—Neill JD, ed. (1994) New York: Raven Press. 29–77.

Jahn R, Sudhof TC. Membrane fusion and exocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem (1999) 68:863–911.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Johnson AD, Gomes WR, Vandemark NL. The Testis. Volume 1: Development, Anatomy, and Physiology. (1970) New York: Academic Press.

Kang-Decker N, Mantchev GT, Juneja SC, McNiven MA, van Deursen JM. Lack of acrosome formation in Hrb-deficient mice. Science (2001) 294:1531–1533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kierszenbaum AL, Rivkin E, Tres LL. The actin-based motor myosin Va is a component of the acroplaxome, an acrosome-nuclear envelope junctional plate, and of manchette-associated vesicles. Cytogenet Genome Res (2003) 103:337–344.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kierszenbaum AL, Tres LL, Rivkin E, Kang-Decker N, van Deursen JM. The acroplaxome is the docking site of Golgi-derived myosin Va/Rab27a/b- containing proacrosomal vesicles in wild-type and Hrb mutant mouse spermatids. Biol Reprod (2004) 70:1400–1410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee NPY, Cheng CY. Ectoplasmic specialization, a testis-specific cell–cell actin-based adherens junction type: Is this a potential target for male contraceptive development? Hum Reprod Update (2004) 10:349–369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee NPY, Cheng CY. Protein kinases and adherens junction dynamics in the seminiferous epithelium of the rat testis. J Cell Physiol (2005) 202:344–360.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lee KF, Chow JF, Xu JS, Chan STH, Ip SM, Yeung WSB. A comparative study of gene expression in murine embryos developed in vivo, cultured in vitro, and cocultured with human oviductal cells using messenger ribonucleic acid differential display. Biol Reprod (2001) 64:910–917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee KF, Yeung WSB, Chow JF, Shum CK, Luk JM. Different testicular gene expression patterns in the first spermatogenic cycle of postnatal and vitamin A-deficient rat testis. Biol Reprod (2004) 70:1010–1017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee KF, Xu JS, Lee YL, Yeung WSB. Demilune cell and parotid protein from murine oviductal epithelium stimulates preimplantation embryo development. Endocrinology (2006) 147:79–87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Linder B, Bammer S, Heinlein UA. Delayed translation and posttranslational processing of cyritestin, an integral transmembrane protein of the mouse acrosome. Exp Cell Res (1995) 221:66–72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Luk JM, Mok BW, Shum CK, Yeung WSB, Tam PC, Tse JY, Chow JF, Woo J, Kam K, Lee KF. Identification of novel genes expressed during spermatogenesis in stage-synchronized rat testes by differential display. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2003) 307:782–790.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Luk JM, Lee NP, Shum CK, Lam BY, Siu AF, Che CM, Tam PC, Cheung AN, Yang ZM, Lin YN, et al. Acrosome-specific gene AEP1: Identification, characterization and roles in spermatogenesis. J Cell Physiol (2006) 209:755–766.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science (1991) 252:1162–1164.[Free Full Text]

Maekawa M, Toyama Y, Yasuda M, Yagi T, Yuasa S. Fyn tyrosine kinase in Sertoli cells is involved in mouse spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod (2002) 66:211–221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mitranond V, Sobhon P, Tosukhowong P, Chindaduangrat W. Cytological changes in the testes of vitamin-A-deficient rats. I. Quantitation of germinal cells in the seminiferous tubules. Acta Anat (Basel) (1979) 103:159–168.[Web of Science][Medline]

Morales C, Griswold MD. Retinol-induced stage synchronization in seminiferous tubules of the rat. Endocrinology (1987) 121:432–434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Sertoli-Sertoli and Sertoli-germ cell interactions and their significance in germ cell movement in the seminiferous epithelium during spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev (2004) 25:747–806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Napoli JL. Retinoic acid biosynthesis and metabolism. FASEB J (1996) 10:993–1001.[Abstract]

Ramalho-Santos J, Schatten G, Moreno RD. Control of membrane fusion during spermiogenesis and the acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod (2002) 67:1043–1051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Russell L, Ettlin RA, Sinha-Hikim AP, Clegg EJ. Histological and histopathological evaluation of the testis. (1990) Clearwater, FL: Cache River. 1–52.

Tomes CN, Michaut M, De Blas G, Visconti P, Matti U, Mayorga LS. SNARE complex assembly is required for human sperm acrosome reaction. Dev Biol (2002) 243:326–338.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Unni E, Rao MR, Ganguly J. Histological and ultrastructural studies on the effect of vitamin A depletion & subsequent repletion with vitamin A on germ cells and Sertoli cells in rat testis. Indian J Exp Biol (1983) 21:180–192.[Web of Science][Medline]

van Pelt AM, de Rooij DG. Retinoic acid is able to reinitiate spermatogenesis in vitamin-A-deficient rats and high replicate doses support the full development of spermatogenic cells. Endocrinology (1991) 128:697–704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

White JC, Highland M, Kaiser M, Clagett-Dame M. Vitamin A deficiency results in the dose-dependent acquisition of anterior character and shortening of the caudal hindbrain of the rat embryo. Dev Biol (2000) 220:263–284.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wine RN, Chapin RE. Adhesion and signaling proteins spatiotemporally associated with spermiation in the rat. J Androl (1999) 20:198–213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yao R, Ito C, Natsume Y, Sugitani Y, Yamanaka H, Kuretake S, Yanagida K, Sato A, Toshimori K, Noda T. Lack of acrosome formation in mice lacking a Golgi protein, GOPC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2002) 99:11211–11216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Submitted on January 22, 2008; resubmitted on June 30, 2008; accepted on July 4, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Y. Liu, S. P. Kodithuwakku, P.-Y. Ng, J. Chai, E. H.Y. Ng, W. S.B. Yeung, P.-C. Ho, and K.-F. Lee
Excessive ovarian stimulation up-regulates the Wnt-signaling molecule DKK1 in human endometrium and may affect implantation: an in vitro co-culture study
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2010; 25(2): 479 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/8/465    most recent
gan041v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Luk, J. M.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Luk, J. M.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?