Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goshen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goshen, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 5, No. 10, 893-895, October 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Debate

What factors regulate HCG production in Down's syndrome pregnancies?

Screening for Down's syndrome using HCG concentrations – a common practice but still and enigma

Ran Goshen

Department of Biological Chemistry, The Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Trisomy 21, phenotypically manifested as Down's syndrome (DS), is the most common autosomal trisomy among live-born babies, and a major known genetic cause of mental retardation. Trisomy 21 pregnancies are associated with changes in maternal serum concentrations of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and its ß subunit. These variables are used, in combination with {alpha}-fetoprotein and oestriol, as markers for screening low-risk populations (aged <35 years) (Bogart et al., 1987Go; Haddow et al., 1992Go, 1994Go, 1998Go). In the first and second trimesters of DS pregnancies, the maternal serum concentrations of free ßHCG and total HCG respectively, are increased while free {alpha}HCG concentration is not altered (Spencer, 1993Go; Brizot et al., 1995Go). Additional markers are being investigated but these still lack any evidence for a better predictive value than the more common triple test (Wald et al., 1992Go; Price et al., 1998Go; Renier et al., 1998Go). Moreover, since the addition of unconjugated oestriol to the double test adds no further advantage (Extermann et al., 1998Go), the role of HCG in the detection of triploidy (Goshen et al., 1994Go), as well as other possible molecular markers, is further supported.

Despite the worldwide use of the triple test for prenatal DS screening, almost no data regarding the biomolecular mechanism, which underlines the high HCG concentrations in DS pregnancies, are available. A better understanding of this pathomechanism may enable us to identify unique factors, that mediate the increased HCG concentrations, thus hopefully enabling us to have a better prenatal screening test for DS pregnancies. While trying to sort out this enigma, one may wish to review what is known on HCG regulation, go ahead with the molecular data underlying the multisystemic nature of DS, and hopefully be able to combine the two.

The regulation of HCG synthesis and secretion has been intensively investigated. However, regulation of HCG expression has been almost exclusively studied in choriocarcinoma cell lines. Cytotrophoblast differentiation into syncytiotrophoblast was shown to be the main factor that leads to HCG production (Hay, 1988Go). Examination of villi from trisomy 21 in the third trimester placentae demonstrated trophoblastic hypoplasia with a resting cytotrophoblastic layer (Jauniaux et al., 1998Go). Accordingly, placental immaturity was one of the theories proposed to explain the endocrinological changes in the maternal serum of trisomy 21 pregnancies (Chard, 1991Go). No association between high HCG concentrations and fetal growth retardation has been found, as would have been expected in the case of placental insufficiency (Luckas et al., 1998Go).

Since DS is essentially a multisystemic disease resulting by overdose of a very small part of the human genome, a possible role for the function of putative transcription factors affecting other chromosomal areas is highly tentative. Data are available to support such a putative pathophysiological mechanism. For example, an homologous factor responsible for neurogenesis in the Drosophila was recently identified to be highly conserved among human, mouse and the fruit fly, and to be mapped to the human chromosome 21q22.2 (Chrast et al., 1997Go). The skeletal anomalies associated with DS were also implicated as originating from an overdose of another transcription factor on chromosome 21 (Sumarsono et al., 1996Go). Other transcription factors have been proposed to exert their phenotypic action either through the control of gene expression (Labudova et al., 1998Go), by regulating chromatin (Chen et al., 1996Go), or through the regulation of adhesion molecules (Paoloni-Giacobino et al., 1997Go).

It is only recently that data regarding the biomolecular characteristics of HCG production in DS pregnancies has become available. Recently, placental expression of HCG subunits in early pregnancies with DS was measured using Northern blot analysis of RNA extracted from 11–15 week placentas of DS pregnancies (Brizot et al., 1995Go). The authors failed to show any difference in mRNA of both HCG subunits extracted from DS placental tissue when compared with normal specimens. Therefore, they suggest that the increase in maternal serum HCG concentrations in DS is not due to an alteration in placental mRNA expression of HCG subunits, but rather a consequence of a post-transcriptional change. However, cytotrophoblasts isolated from second trimester DS placentae revealed elevated HCG excretion, and increased HCGß mRNA concentrations resembling the amounts found for first trimester cytotrophoblasts (Eldar-Geva et al., 1995Go). The discrepancies between these two studies are problematic, and may be due to methodological differences in the study design; the former utilizing a crude placental specimen for extracting HCG mRNA as opposed to the latter study that used cytotrophoblast cells in culture. An additional possible explanation for the discrepancy in the two studies may be related to the different placental age used in both studies. Brizot et al. used first trimester placentae while Eldar-Geva et al. used second trimester placentae. However, cytotrophoblasts purified from placentae of different gestational age, have been shown to resemble invasive (Kliman et al., 1990Go) and biochemical (Goshen et al., 1996Go) characteristics of first trimester placenta. Therefore, these purified cytotrophoblasts may still reflect the status of first trimester HCG production.

In order to resolve this enigma, one may aim to specifically look at the HCG gene activation which might be altered in DS. The synthesis of ß chains is the rate-limiting factor in HCG synthesis. Multiple copies of structurally-related LHß/HCGß genes are located on the human chromosome 19q.13.3 (Boorstein et al., 1982Go). Six HCGß genes are recognized (Graham et al., 1987Go), four of which are expressed in the placenta (Miller-Lindholm et al., 1997Go), while the expression of HCGß5 and HCGß3, being the main genes expressed in placenta, at a ratio of ~7:1 (Talmadge et al., 1984Go). Therefore, we have recently investigated the HCGß5 promoter as a candidate for the regulation of HCG synthesis (Goshen et al., 1999Go). In this study we were able to document, for three out of the six DS-derived fibroblasts cell cultures, which were transfected with the HCGß5 promoter construct, an augmented HCGß promoter activity. We suggested that elevated HCGß mRNA in DS-isolated cytotrophoblasts may be induced by an enhanced promoter activation. This mechanism is the first one proposed to explain the association between high HCG maternal serum concentrations and DS pregnancies.

One may postulate that a transcription factor, located on the extra segment of chromosome 21, may up-regulate HCGß transcription by interacting with its promoter. As a matter of fact, since the over-expression of any particular gene on chromosome 21 in trisomic cells is by 1.5-fold, while the average increase of HCG concentrations is higher than that, one may suspect that other processes regulating HCG maternal-serum concentrations are involved. However, a positive transcription factor encoded by a gene located on chromosome 21, may outbalance a negative inhibitory factor competing for the same DNA sequence. Such a competition can explain a higher than 1.5-fold increase.

The issue of such a transcription factor may have many more implications than that of understanding the mechanism underlying the high HCG concentrations. If such a factor will be identified, it may be used to have a rapid assessment of DS existence in any tissue or blood sample, prior to or instead of being subjected to karyotyping. Moreover, this may broaden our understanding of the complexity in DS phenotypic–genotypic correlation. Last but not least, it may help us understand why are we doing what we do, and possibly explain other examples of high HCG concentrations in other aneuploidies and altered pregnancy outcome.

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Mr. Nathan Blieman on behalf of the Medallion Properties Inc. for their generous support in the Canada International Scientific Exchange Program (CISEPO) Project as well as the generous grants provided by the Halbert Foundation and the American Physician Fellowship Inc. for Medicine in Israel (APF).

Notes

To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5

This debate was previously published on Webtrack 75, July 1, 1999

References

Bogart, M.H., Pandian, M.R. and Jones, O.W. (1987) Abnormal maternal serum chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies with fetal chromosome abnormalities. Prenat. Diagn., 7, 623–630.[ISI][Medline]

Boorstein, W.R., Vamvakopoulos, N.C. and Fiddes, J.C. (1982) Human chorionic gonadotropin beta-subunit is encoded by at least eight genes arranged in tandem and inverted pairs. Nature, 300, 419–422.[Medline]

Brizot, M.L., Jauniaux, E., McKie, A.T. et al. (1995) Placental expression of alpha and beta subunits of human chorionic gonadotrophin in early pregnancies with Down's syndrome. Hum. Reprod., 10, 2506–2509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chard, T. (1991) Biochemistry and endocrinology of the Down's syndrome pregnancy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 626580–62696.

Chen, H., Rossier, C. and Antonarakis, S.E. (1996) Cloning of a human homolog of the Drosophila enhancer of zeste gene (EZH2) that maps to chromosome 21q22.2. Genomics, 38, 30–37.[ISI][Medline]

Chrast, R., Scott, H.S., Chen, H. et al. (1997) Cloning of two human homologs of the Drosophila single-minded gene SIM1 on chromosome 6q and SIM2 on 21q within the Down syndrome chromosomal region. [Letter.] Genome Res., 7, 615–624.

Eldar-Geva, T., Hochberg, A., deGroot, N. et al. (1995) High maternal serum chorionic gonadotropin level in Downs' syndrome pregnancies is caused by elevation of both subunits messenger ribonucleic acid level in trophoblasts. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 80, 3528–3531.[Abstract]

Extermann, P., Bischof, P., Marguerat, P. et al. (1998) Second-trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome: free beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and alpha-fetoprotein, with or without unconjugated oestriol, compared with total HCG, alpha-fetoprotein and unconjugated oestriol. Hum. Reprod., 13, 220–223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goshen, R., Gonik, B., de-Groot, N. et al. (1994) The genomic basis of ß human chorionic gonadotropin diversity in triploidy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 170, 700–701.[ISI][Medline]

Goshen, R., Hochberg, A. A., Korner, G. et al. (1996) Purification and characterization of placental heparanase and its expression by cultured cytotrophoblasts. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 2, 679–684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goshen, R., Gonik, B., Ariel, I. et al. (1999) High levels of maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin in Down Syndrome pregnancies: the possible role of a transcription factor on chromosome 21. Fetal Diagn. Ther., 14, 106–111.[ISI][Medline]

Graham, M.Y., Otani, T., Boime, I. et al. (1987) Cosmid mapping of the human chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit genes by field-inversion gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res., 15, 4437–4448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haddow, J.E., Palomaki, G.E., Knight, G.J. et al. (1994) Reducing the need for amniocentesis in women 35 years of age or older with serum markers for screening. [See comments.] N. Engl. J. Med., 330, 1114–1118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haddow, J.E., Palomaki, G.E., Knight, G.J. et al. (1998) Screening of maternal serum for fetal Down's syndrome in the first trimester. N. Engl. J. Med., 338, 955–961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haddow, J.E., Palomaki, G.E., Knight, G.J. et al. (1992) Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome with use of maternal serum markers. [See comments.] N. Engl. J. Med., 327, 588–593.[Abstract]

Hay, D.L. (1988) Placental histology and the production of human choriogonadotrophin and its subunits in pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 95, 1268–1275.[ISI][Medline]

Jauniaux, E. and Hustin, J. (1998) Chromosomally abnormal early ongoing pregnancies: correlation of ultrasound and placental histological findings. Hum. Pathol., 29, 1195–1199.[ISI][Medline]

Kliman, H.J. and Feinberg, R.F. (1990) Human trophoblast-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions in vitro: ECM thickness modulates morphology and proteolytic activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 3057–3061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Labudova, O., Krapfenbauer, K., Moenkemann, H. et al. (1998) Decreased transcription factor junD in brains of patients with Down syndrome. Neurosci. Lett., 252, 159–162.[ISI][Medline]

Luckas, M.J., Sandland, R., Hawe, J. et al. (1998) Fetal growth retardation and second trimester maternal serum human chorionic gonadotrophin levels. Placenta, 19, 143–147.[ISI][Medline]

Miller-Lindholm, A.K., LaBenz, C.J., Ramey, J. et al. (1997) Human chorionic gonadotropin-beta gene expression in first trimester placenta. Endocrinology, 138, 5459–5465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Paoloni-Giacobino, A., Chen, H. and Antonarakis, S.E. (1997) Cloning of a novel human neural cell adhesion molecule gene (NCAM2) that maps to chromosome region 21q21 and is potentially involved in Down syndrome. Genomics, 43, 43–51.[ISI][Medline]

Price, K.M., Van Lith, J.M., Silman, R. et al. (1998) First trimester maternal serum concentrations of fetal antigen 2 in normal pregnancies and those affected by trisomy 21. Hum. Reprod., 13, 1706–1708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Renier, M.A., Vereecken, A., Van Herck, E. et al. (1998) Second trimester maternal dimeric inhibin-A in the multiple-marker screening test for Down's syndrome. Hum. Reprod., 13, 744–748.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Spencer, K. (1993) Free alpha-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin in Down syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 168, 132–135.[ISI][Medline]

Sumarsono, S.H., Wilson, T.J., Tymms, M.J. et al. (1996) Down's syndrome-like skeletal abnormalities in Ets2 transgenic mice. Nature, 379, 534–537.[Medline]

Talmadge, K., Boorstein, W. R., Vamvakopoulos, N.C. et al. (1984) Only three of the seven human chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit genes can be expressed in the placenta. Nucleic Acids Res., 12, 8415–8436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wald, N., Stone, R., Cuckle, H.S. et al. (1992) First trimester concentrations of pregnancy associated plasma protein A and placental protein 14 in Down's syndrome [see comments]. Br. Med. J., 305, 28.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
F. Debieve, A. Moiset, K. Thomas, S. Pampfer, and C. Hubinont
Vascular endothelial growth factor and placenta growth factor concentrations in Down's syndrome and control pregnancies
Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 765 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Knofler, L. Saleh, S. Bauer, R. Vasicek, G. Griesinger, H. Strohmer, H. Helmer, and P. Husslein
Promoter Elements and Transcription Factors Involved in Differentiation-Dependent Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin-{alpha} Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression of Term Villous Trophoblasts
Endocrinology, October 1, 2000; 141(10): 3737 - 3748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goshen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goshen, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?