Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vrettou, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kanavakis, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vrettou, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kanavakis, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 8, No. 9, 880-886, September 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Reproductive genetics

Multiplex sequence variation detection throughout the CFTR gene appropriate for preimplantation genetic diagnosis in populations with heterogeneity of cystic fibrosis mutations

Christina Vrettou1,2, Maria Tzetis1, Joanne Traeger-Synodinos1, Giles Palmer1 and Emmanuel Kanavakis1,3

1 Medical Genetics, Athens University and 2 Research Institute for the Study of Genetic and Malignant Disorders in Childhood, St Sophia’s Children’s Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most important genetic diseases requiring prevention programmes. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) represents an alternative to prenatal diagnosis, and is especially appropriate for couples with an unsuccessful reproductive history. For clinical application, protocols must be optimized to minimize PCR failure, allelic drop-out (ADO) and contamination, while simultaneously detecting a wide spectrum of CF genotypes. We have developed a flexible multiplex PCR protocol allowing analysis of sequence variations in any combination amongst seven CFTR gene exons (4, 10, 11, 13 in two parts, 14b, 17b and 21) by nested PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis, along with analysis of a fluorescently labelled intragenic microsatellite (IVS8CA). The experiments were carried out on 390 single lymphocytes from three CF patients, one heterozygote and one non-CF individual. PCR efficiency of the exons ranged from 90 to 100%, and ADO from 0 to 3.8%. IVS8CA was co-amplified with a PCR efficiency of 92.4 and 10.8% ADO. The present method overcomes the need for separate assays for each CFTR gene mutation. Additionally, it facilitates analysis of any informative linked polymorphic sequence variation (within the seven exons) along with analysis of a microsatellite, which is useful (when informative) for minimizing misdiagnosis and/or indirect diagnosis. This method proved robust and flexible for diagnosing diverse CF genotype combinations in single cells.

cystic fibrosis/denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis/mutation analysis/preimplantation genetic diagnosis


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common autosomal recessive disease in Caucasians (Welsh et al., 1995Go) and in Greece constitutes the second most common monogenic disorder (after ß-thalassaemia and related haemoglobinopathies), with up to 5% of the population being carriers for CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations (authors, unpublished data). It is caused by defects in the CFTR gene (250 kb) located on chromosome 7q31–32 and consisting of 27 exons (Riordan et al., 1989Go; Zielenski et al., 1991Go). The normal CFTR protein comprises 1480 aa and functions as a chloride channel. Defects in the CFTR protein cause an abnormal chloride concentration along the apical membrane of epithelial cells resulting in progressive lung disease, pancreatic dysfunction and male infertility (Welsh et al., 1995Go; Kanavakis et al., 1998Go; Tzetis et al., 2000Go). Infertility in CF males results from congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and may even occur in the absence of other clinical CF symptoms. Furthermore, there have been reports of increased frequencies of CF mutations in healthy men with reduced sperm quality and/or obstructive azoospermia, even in the presence of the vas deferens (Anguiano et al., 1992Go; Mercier et al., 1995Go; Van der Ven et al., 1996Go; Meschede and Horst, 1997Go; Pauer et al., 1997Go; Kanavakis et al., 1998Go).

Prenatal diagnosis and termination of affected pregnancies is the current approach for controlling severe genetic diseases such as CF. An alternative to prenatal diagnosis is the diagnosis and selective transfer of healthy IVF embryos (preimplantation genetic diagnosis, PGD), therefore avoiding the need to terminate ongoing pregnancies. PGD may also be more appropriate for couples with an unsuccessful reproductive history (repeated selected abortions or fertility problems) and especially for those couples who are undergoing assisted reproduction for male infertility and who have the additional risk of transmitting CF.

PGD is usually performed on single blastomere cells biopsied from 6- to 8-cell cleavage stage embryos (Handyside et al., 1990Go; Kanavakis and Traeger-Synodinos, 2002Go). For PGD of monogenic diseases, diagnostic protocols are based on PCR and have to address the inherent problems of single cell PCR [total PCR failure and allelic drop-out (ADO)], and in addition facilitate the accurate genotyping of the cell for the disease under investigation. In Southern Europe, including Greece, CF is characterized by great allelic heterogeneity compared with the populations of Northern Europe (Kerem et al., 1989Go; Chevalier-Porst et al., 1994Go; Chillon et al., 1994Go; Tzetis et al., 1997Go, 2000Go; Kanavakis et al., 1998Go). Most of the approaches for PGD of CF that have been described to date have either not addressed the problem of diagnosing a wide spectrum of mutation combinations (Liu et al., 1993Go; Ao et al., 1996Go; Schaaff et al., 1996Go; Scobie et al., 1996Go; Tsai et al., 1999Go) or require the design of case-specific protocols each time (Goossens et al., 2000Go). Protocols based on the analysis of CFTR gene-linked polymorphic markers have been described which are quite widely applicable for some Northern European populations (Dreesen et al., 2000Go; Eftedal et al., 2001Go), although their usefulness has not been assessed elsewhere.

In this study, our aim was to develop a practical, flexible PGD protocol appropriate for analysis of a wide spectrum of potentially affected genotypes in the Greek population, precluding the design of case-specific protocols each time. Exons 4, 10, 11, 13 (in two parts, a and b), 14b, 17b and 21 of the CFTR gene contain ~47 different mutations accounting for 81% of CF chromosomes in Greece (Tzetis et al., 1997Go; authors, unpublished data). All mutations within these exons can be detected with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis (Fanen et al., 1992Go), which as a scanning method can detect any sequence variation in a single amplified region. For that reason, we standardized a protocol involving first round multiplex PCR (for any combination of the seven CFTR exons) followed by nested PCR/s producing amplicons analysable by DGGE. Polymorphic sequence variation(s) present in any of the seven exons can also be detected by DGGE and exploited, through linkage, for indirect analysis and/or to cross-check the genotype. A fluorescently labelled intragenic polymorphic microsatellite, IVS8CA (71% expected heterozygosity in the Greek population; authors, unpublished data), was included in the multiplex PCR to facilitate confirmation of the genotype or for indirect diagnosis (when informative).


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Cell samples
Experiments were carried out on a total of 390 single lymphocytes: 290 lymphocytes from three CF patients and one CF heterozygote (carrier for one CF mutation and two polymorphisms) (Table IGo) and 100 lymphocytes from a non-affected individual. The lymphocytes were isolated from the nucleated cell phase, after density gradient centrifugation at 800 g of 2.5 ml of whole blood diluted with an equal volume of 0.9% NaCl, using Ficoll separating solution (Density 1.077, Seromed; Biochrom KG, Berlin, Germany) (Vrettou et al., 1999Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. PCR efficiency and allele drop-out (ADO) in 290 single lymphocyte samples from three CF patients and one heterozygote
 
Manipulation of all cell types was performed under a binocular dissecting microscope (Nikon SMZ-U) using finely pulled glass pipettes. Each cell sample was rinsed six times in microdrops of IVF medium (Scandanavian IVF Science, AB, Sweden) and placed in 10 µl of double-distilled water in DNAse-free, RNAse-free 0.2 ml Eppendorf tubes prior to further processing (Vrettou et al., 1999Go).

Following cell selection, samples were frozen at –20°C until time of cell lysis and PCR set-up.

Cell lysis
A total of 5 µl of PCR-grade Proteinase K (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Germany), diluted in double-distilled water, was added to the 10 µl of water containing the selected cell, to a final concentration of 50 µg/ml. The enzyme was activated by incubation at 37°C for 1 h followed by 65°C for 10 min, and inactivated by heating to 95°C for 10 min (Traeger-Synodinos et al., 1997Go).

Genotype analysis
The protocol involved a first round multiplex PCR (2.5 h), containing PCR primers for the appropriate exons (selected according to the genotype under investigation) as well as for the IVS8CA microsatellite, followed by (i) nested PCR to produce DGGE analysable fragment(s) (2.5 h) and electrophoresis on a denaturing gradient gel (5 h), and in parallel (ii) size analysis of the fluorescently labelled microsatellite marker (3 h).

Initial experiments were set up to investigate the efficiency of exon amplification (but not ADO) in multiplex PCR reactions for various CFTR exons in the following combinations: (i) exons 4, 10, 11 and 21 (containing 72.1% of the mutations in the Greek population) and (ii) exons 13 (in two parts, a and b), 14b and 17b (containing an additional 8.5%). PCR primers for the microsatellite marker IVS8CA were included with each combination. The experiments were performed on single lymphocytes from a non-CF individual using identical PCR conditions for both primer sets. Separate nested PCR reactions for each exon followed the multiplex PCR, and successful amplification was indicated by the presence of a correctly sized PCR product on agarose gel electrophoresis. Efficiency of co-amplification of the IVS8CA microsatellite in the first-round multiplex PCR was evaluated by detection of an appropriately sized PCR product on an automatic DNA sequencer.

Once satisfactory amplification of all exons and the IVS8CA microsatellite was established, the PCR efficiency of other (any) exon combinations and the rate of ADO were evaluated by applying the method to genotype single lymphocytes from three CF patients and one CF heterozygote, with known mutations/polymorphisms in the CFTR gene (Table IGo). DGGE analysis of the appropriate exons simultaneously confirmed the accuracy of genotype analysis and ADO rates for exons. In addition, the lymphocyte donors (excluding the non-CF individual) were selected to have two different allele sizes for the IVS8CA microsatellite marker, for evaluation of ADO for this site.

First-round multiplex PCR
PCR primers for the first round multiplex PCR for the seven CFTR exons and for the fluorescent amplification of the IVS8CA microsatellite were as previously described (Zielenski et al., 1991Go; Morral and Estivill, 1992Go) (Table IIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Primer list
 
A long initial denaturation time was applied to ensure complete denaturation of genomic template DNA (Ray and Handyside, 1996Go), facilitated by the use of the modified heat-activated form of a recombinant Taq DNA polymerase (HotStarTaq; Qiagen) and followed by a protocol of short PCR cycling times based on a previously published method (Vrettou et al., 1999Go). PCR reactions were carried out in 50 µl volumes containing 30 µl of the premixed solution of buffer/dNTPs/MgCl2/Taq polymerase provided by the manufacturer and 1 µmol/l of each primer, except for the fluorescent primer which was added to a concentration of 0.3 µmol/l. The PCR cycles were: initial denaturation of 15 min at 95°C, followed by 20 cycles of 96°C for 30 s, 55°C for 40 s and 72°C for 30 s and 20 more cycles of 96°C for 30 s, 55°C for 20 s and 72°C for 30 s.

Between 1 and 2 µl of the fluorescent (Texas Red) tagged PCR-generated template of polymorphic dinucleotide microsatellite marker (IVS8CA) (Morral and Estivill, 1992Go) was then electrophoresed in a 7% denaturing acrylamide gel (32% formamide, 5.6 mol/l urea, in TBE) and was sized (and analysed) on a Vistra automatic DNA sequencer 725 using the Fragmentor software (Molecular Dynamics/Amersham Life Sciences, UK).

Nested PCR and DGGE analysis
Nested PCR primers for DGGE analysis of exons were as previously described (Fanen et al., 1992Go) (Table IIGo). In all experiments exons were separately reamplified (according to the genotype of the sample under investigation) using 1 µl of the first round of PCR in a 50 µl volume containing a premixed solution of buffer/dNTPs/MgCl2/Taq polymerase provided by the manufacturer (HotStarTaq; Qiagen) and 0.4 µmol/l of each primer appropriate for DGGE analysis (Fanen et al., 1992Go). The PCR cycling conditions were 95°C for 15 min followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 20 s at the appropriate annealing temperature for each exon (Table IIGo) and 30 s at 72°C. Following the nested PCR, 10 µl of amplification products were checked by agarose gel electrophoresis and mutations/polymorphisms were analysed by DGGE as previously described (Fanen et al., 1992Go).

Precautions against contamination
In all experiments, precautions against contamination were stringent. Manipulation of cells and PCR set-up were carried out in separate UV-treated laminar flow hoods. PCR set-up employed exclusive PCR pipettes and pipette tips with filters. A maximum of 10 single cell samples was analysed per experiment. In the first round PCR, one tube containing IVF medium and cell lysis mixture only and one tube containing PCR mixture only were included as negative (blank) controls. In the nested PCR set-up (which included nesting the two negative controls from the first PCR), an additional two blanks containing PCR mixture only were included for all experiment sets.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In the two multiplexed CFTR exon sets (50 single lymphocytes from the non-CF individual each), PCR efficiency for each exon was 94% (exon 4), 92% (exon 10), 98% (exon 11), 96% (exon 21), 98% (exon 13, part a), 92% (exon 13, part b), 98% (exon 14b) and 94% (exon 17b). Co-amplification of IVS8CA showed 91% PCR efficiency with exons 4, 10, 11 and 21, and 94% PCR efficiency with exons 13 (part a and b), 14b and 17b. This non-CF individual was homozygous for the allele size of IVS8CA.

DNA from single lymphocytes of the three CF patients and the one CF heterozygote was amplified (using nested PCR) for the appropriate (two) exons according to the genotype, and also for the IVS8CA marker (Figures 1 and 2GoGo). ADO rates for exons were evaluated following DGGE analysis, and ADO was scored when a single homoduplex band was observed (Figure 1Go). Occasional samples gave patterns with faint homoduplex and/or heteroduplex bands (Figure 1Go), implicating preferential amplification from one of the alleles (Findlay et al., 1995Go). This was not considered to represent ADO (Figure 1Go). The results of PCR efficiency and ADO are summarized in Table IGo.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. DGGE analysis of the mutations/polymorphisms of single lymphocytes from the four lymphocyte donors. (Note: DGGE gels for exons 10 and 17b sporadically demonstrated non-specific electrophoretic bands below the homoduplex bands.)

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Analysis of fluorescently labelled dinucleotide microsatellite IVS8CA of single lymphocytes from patient 1 (F508del/621+1G->T). Line 2 (bottom): double heterozygous pattern of the 196 and 192 bp alleles which represent 25 and 23 CA repeats respectively; line 1 (top): ADO of the 192 bp allele.

 
PCR products were not observed in any of the negative controls (blanks) amongst the 30 sets of up to 10 cells that were analysed (i.e. 60 blank tubes from the first PCR and 120 blank tubes from the nested PCR reactions), indicating that contamination, from external sources or PCR carry-over, was not a problem with the stringent precautions applied.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
CF is targeted as one of the priority diseases for prevention programmes, but prenatal diagnosis with termination of affected pregnancies is not always a preferable option, and PGD represents an alternative approach. The development of a PGD protocol for CF is additionally useful because of the association of some forms of male infertility with mutations in the CFTR gene. In such cases, female partners should also be screened for CFTR gene mutations and in cases where they are both carriers, PGD can be considered in combination with the assisted reproduction procedure.

Most of the described approaches for PGD of CF are based on designing protocols for the most frequent CF mutations or case-specific protocols (Liu et al., 1993Go; Ao et al., 1996Go; Schaaff et al., 1996Go; Tsai, 1999Go; Goossens et al., 2000Go). For a common disorder such as CF and associated atypical forms (such as male infertility) where as many as 40–50 mutations may account for ~80% of CF alleles (especially for the Southern European populations) (Chevalier-Porst et al., 1994Go; Chillon et al., 1994Go), it is more practical to develop a widely applicable diagnostic protocol than to design case-specific methods each time. A potentially appropriate method that uses indirect genotyping through linkage analysis of extragenic CFTR gene markers has been described (Dreesen et al., 2000Go), but it has only been evaluated for the Dutch and French Canadian populations, and there are no data on its usefulness in other populations. Our study evaluates an alternative strategy for simultaneously detecting sequence variations in up to seven different exons in the CFTR gene, along with size analysis of a linked microsatellite marker.

PCR efficiency for all exons and the microsatellite marker (IVS8CA) was >90% in all six different multiplex PCR reactions (two sets of four exons then four sets of two exons, see Table IGo). ADO amongst the seven CFTR exons ranged from 0 to 3.8%, all well within acceptable limits for single-cell PCR (ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee, 2001Go). Paradoxically, ADO for the fluorescent PCR of IVS8CA was much higher (10.8%) than for the conventional PCR of the exons, which is contrary to the expected advantages of using fluorescent PCR. A possible reason for this is that the annealing temperature used in the multiplex reaction was optimal for the exons, but higher than optimal (by 5°C) for the microsatellite marker primers (Morral and Estivill, 1992Go). Despite this, the ADO for IVS8CA is still within the acceptable range for PGD application.

For clinical PGD cycles when parental genotypes involve two different CFTR mutations (or the same mutation) within the same exon, DGGE facilitates the detection of both alleles simultaneously such that the presence of a normal band (as part of a heterozygote pattern or alone) insures a non-affected embryo for transfer, even if ADO has occurred (Vrettou et al., 1999Go). For genotypes including two mutations in different exons, the presence of a mutant band in both fragments (as part of a heterozygote pattern, or alone if ADO has occurred) indicates an affected genotype (Figure 3Go). Although the absence of a mutant band in one or both of the two exons indicates an unaffected genotype (heterozygous or normal genotype respectively), there may be a risk of an unacceptable misdiagnosis due to ADO.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Theoretical calculation of the possibility to misdiagnose and transfer an affected embryo, combined heterozygote for the mutations M1 and M2, which occur in different exons A and B respectively. Calculations refer to the potentially affected embryos (25% of all the embryos to be analysed) and is based on the chance of observing each combination of DGGE analysis patterns, due to ADO, as illustrated in the figure. For this calculating approach, the maximum ADO rate of 4% which was observed in trials (exon 21) was used for both exons even though most exons had negligible ADO (Table IGo). The total risk of misdiagnosing an affected embryo is 0.0396 which reflects 0.99% (<1%) of all embryos tested.

 
The ADO observed in this study (between 0 and 3.8% in exon 21, Table IGo) was very low in comparison with other reports (Findlay et al., 1995Go; Goossens et al., 2000Go), although it remains a possible cause of misdiagnosis including the danger of rejecting a healthy embryo or transferring an affected embryo. The theoretical possibility of misdiagnosis was calculated, taking into consideration an overestimated maximum ADO rate of ~4% for all fragments. When the two mutations are in the same exon, failure to amplify the normal allele may lead to rejection of 1% of heterozygous embryos (with no unacceptable consequences) (Vrettou et al., 1999Go). In cases where the two mutations are in different exons, the amplification of independent regions of the gene are each subject to the random occurrence of ADO and this may lead to a 0.0396 possibility of transferring an affected embryo for implantation (Figure 3Go). This was calculated as the sum of the products of the possibilities of ‘unaffected’ combinations of DGGE patterns being in fact ‘affected’ (Figure 3Go). The above possibility refers only to misdiagnosing affected genotypes/embryos, which theoretically account for 25%; thus for all embryos tested, the overall possibility of misdiagnosis is <1%.

DGGE analysis is an accurate, reliable method with relatively low running costs, and is amongst the methods commonly chosen for routine genotyping and prenatal diagnosis for many monogenic disorders (Losekoot et al., 1990Go; Fanen et al., 1992Go; Kanavakis et al., 1997Go; Nissen et al., 1998Go; Romstad et al., 2000Go). In addition, our laboratory has been successfully applying an analogous DGGE-based genotyping strategy for PGD of ß-thalassaemia for the last 3 years (Kanavakis et al., 1999Go). The calculated risk of misdiagnosis with unacceptable consequences due to ADO for this method (in those cases when the two mutations are in different exons) was based on an overestimated ADO rate of 4%, implying that, in practice, the risk of misdiagnosis with this method is much less than 1%. Additionally, the analysis of the linked polymorphic sequence variations (when informative) should further minimize the chance of misdiagnosis in PGD cycles. Thus this method represents an extremely robust and flexible approach for the application of PGD for diverse genotype combinations; this has not been so far addressed for Southern European populations by any previously published method.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The authors wish to thank Konstantina Pouliou and Stavroula Papadopoulou for technical assistance. This work was partly funded by an Athens University Research Grant (ELKE no. 70/4/4255). C.V. is supported by a post-doctoral scholarship from the Greek State Scholarship Foundation.


    Notes
 
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail ekanavak{at}cc.uoa.gr Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Anguiano, A., Oates, R.D., Amos, J.A., Dean, M., Gerrard, B., Stewart, C., Maher, T.A., White, M.B. and Milunsky, A. (1992) Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens: A primarily genital form of cystic fibrosis. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 267, 1794–1797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ao, A., Ray, P., Harper, J., Lesko, J., Paraschos, T., Atkinson, G., Soussis, I., Taylor, D., Handyside, A., Hughes, M. et al. (1996) Clinical experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis ({Delta}F508). Prenat. Diagn., 16, 137–142.[Web of Science][Medline]

Chevalier-Porst, F., Bonardot, A.M., Gilly, R., Chazalette, J.P., Mathieu, M. and Bozon, D. (1994) Mutation analysis in 600 French cystic fibrosis patients. J. Med. Genet., 31, 541–544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chillon, M., Casals, T., Gimenez, J., Ramos, M.D., Palacio, A., Morral, N., Estivill, X. and Nunes, V. (1994) Analysis of the CFTR gene confirms the high genetic heterogeneity of the Spanish population: 43 mutations account for only 78% of CF chromosomes. Hum. Genet., 93, 447–451.[Web of Science][Medline]

Dreesen, J.C.F.M., Jacobs, L.J.A.M., Bras, M., Herbergs, J., Dumoulin, J.C.M., Geraedts, J.P.M., Evers, J.L.H. and Smeets, H.J.M. (2000) Multiplex PCR of polymorphic markers flanking the CFTR gene; a general approach for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 6, 391–396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eftedal, I., Schwartz, M., Bendtsen, H., Andersen, A.N. and Ziebe, S. (2001) Single intragenic microsatellite preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cystic fibrosis provides positive allele identification of all CFTR genotypes for informative couples. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 7, 307–312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee (2001) Data collection II. Hum. Reprod., 17, 233–246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fanen, P., Ghanem, N., Vidaud, M., Besmond, C., Martin, J., Costes, B., Plassa, F. and Goossens, M. (1992) Molecular characterization of cystic fibrosis: 16 novel mutations identified by analysis of the whole cystic fibrosis conductance transmembrane regulator (CRTR) coding regions and splice site junctions. Genomics, 13, 770–776.[Web of Science][Medline]

Findlay, I., Ray, P., Quirke, P., Rutherford, A. and Richard, L. (1995) Allelic drop-out and preferential amplification in single cells and human blastomeres: implications for preimplantation diagnosis of sex and cystic fibrosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 1, 1609–1618.

Goossens, V., Sermon, K., Lissens, W., Vandervorst, M., Vanderfaeillie, A., De Rijcke, M., De Vos, A., Henderix, P., Van de Velde, H., Van Steirteghem, A. et al. (2000) Clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cystic fibrosis. Prenat. Diagn., 20, 571–581.[Web of Science][Medline]

Handyside, A.H., Kontogianni, E.H., Hardy, K. and Winston, R.M. (1990) Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature, 344, 768–770.[Medline]

Kanavakis, E. and Traeger-Synodinos, J. (2002) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice. J. Med. Genet., 39, 6–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kanavakis, E., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Vrettou, C., Maragoudaki, E., Tzetis, M. and Kattamis, C. (1997) Prenatal diagnosis of the thalassemia syndromes by rapid DNA analytical methods. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 3, 523–528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kanavakis, E., Tzetis, M., Antoniadi, Th., Pistofisis, G., Milligos, S. and Kattamis, C. (1998) Cystic fibrosis mutation screening in CBAVD patients and men with obstructive azoospermia or severe oligospermia. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 4, 333–337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kanavakis, E., Vrettou, C., Palmer, G., Tzetis, M., Mastrominas, M. and Traeger-Synodinos, J. (1999) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in 10 couples at risk for transmitting ß-thalassemia major: clinical experience including the initiation of six singleton pregnancies. Prenat. Diagn., 19, 1217–1222.[Web of Science][Medline]

Kerem, E., Rommens, J., Buchanan, J.A., Markiewicz, D., Cox, T.K., Chakravarti, A., Buchwald, M. and Tsui, L.C. (1989) Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis. Science, 245, 1073–1080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu, J., Lissens, W., Devroey, P., Van Steirteghem, A. and Liebaers, I. (1993) Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the cystic fibrosis {Delta}F508 mutation in human blastomeres following oocyte injection of a single sperm from a carrier. Prenat. Diagn., 13, 873–880.[Web of Science][Medline]

Losekoot, M., Fodde, R., Harteveld, C.L., van Heeren, H., Giordano, P.C. and Bernini, L.F. (1990) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and direct sequencing of PCR amplified genomic DNA: a rapid and reliable diagnostic approach to beta thalassemia. Br. J. Haematol., 76, 269–274.[Web of Science][Medline]

Mercier, B., Verlingue, C., Lissens, W., Silber, S.J., Novelli, G., Bonduelle, M., Audrezet, M.P. and Ferec, C. (1995) Is congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens a primary form of cystic fibrosis? Analyses of the CFTR gene in 67 patients. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 56, 272–277.[Web of Science][Medline]

Meschede, D. and Horst, J. (1997) The molecular genetics of male infertility. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 3, 419–430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morral, N. and Estivill, X. (1992) Multiplex PCR amplification of three microsatellites within the CFTR gene. Genomics, 13, 1362–1364.[Web of Science][Medline]

Nissen, H., Hansen, A.B., Guldberg, P., Hansen, T.S., Petersen, N.E. and Horder, M. (1998) Evaluation of a clinically applicable mutation screening technique for genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia and familial defective apolipoprotein B. Clin. Genet., 53, 433–439.[Web of Science][Medline]

Pauer, H.U., Hinney, B., Michelmann, H.W., Krasemann, E.W., Zoll, B. and Engel, W. (1997) Relevance of genetic counselling in couples prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod., 12, 1909–1912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ray, P.F. and Handyside, A.H. (1996) Increasing the denaturation temperature during the first cycles of amplification reduces allele drop out from single cells for preimplantation diagnosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 2, 213–218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Riordan, J.R., Rommens, J.M., Kerem, B., Alon, N., Rozmahel, R., Grzelczak, Z., Zielenski, J., Lok, S., Plavsic, N. and Chou, J.L. (1989) Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science, 245, 1066–1073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Romstad, A., Kalkanoglu, H.S., Coskun, T., Demirkol, M., Tokatli, A., Dursun, A., Baykal, T., Ozalp, I., Guldberg, P. and Guttler, F. (2000) Molecular analysis of 16 Turkish families with DHPR deficiency using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Hum. Genet., 107, 546–553.[Web of Science][Medline]

Schaaff, F., Wedemann, H. and Schwinger, E. (1996) Analysis of sex and DF508 in single amniocytes using primer extension preamplification. Hum. Genet., 98, 158–161.[Web of Science][Medline]

Scobie, G., Woodroffe, B., Fishel, S. and Kalsheker, N. (1996) Identification of the five most common cystic fibrosis mutations in single cells using a rapid and specific differential amplification system. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 2, 203–207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Traeger-Synodinos, J., Palmer, G., Tzetis, M., Mastrominas, M., Kanavakis, E. and Katamis, C. (1997) Preliminary studies on the feasibility of preimplantation diagnosis for beta-thalassemia. Medizinische Genetic, 9 (Suppl) 60.

Tsai, Y.H. (1999) Cost-effective one-step PCR amplification of cystic fibrosis DF508 fragment in a Single cell for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat. Diagn., 19, 1048–1051.[Web of Science][Medline]

Tzetis, M., Kanavakis, E., Antoniadi, Th., Doudounakis, S., Adam, G. and Kattamis, C. (1997) Characterization of more than 85% of cystic fibrosis alleles in the Greek population, including five novel mutations. Hum. Genet., 99, 121–125.[Web of Science][Medline]

Tzetis, M., Efthymiadou, A., Strofalis, S., Psychou, P., Dimakou, A., Pouliou, E., Doudounakis, S. and Kanavakis, E. (2000) CFTR gene mutations—including three novel nucleotide substitutions—and haplotype background in patients with asthma, disseminated bronchiectasies and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Hum. Genet., 108, 216–221.

Tzetis, M., Efthymiadou, A., Doudounakis, S. and Kanavakis, E. (2001) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of mRNA associated with four putative splicing mutations (621+3A>G, 2751+2T>A, 296+1G>C, 1717–9T> C-D565G) and one nonsense mutation (E822X) in the CFTR gene. Hum. Genet., 109, 592–601.[Web of Science][Medline]

Van der Ven, K., Messer, L., Van der Ven, H., Jeyendran, R.S. and Ober, C. (1996) Cystic fibrosis mutation screening in healthy men with reduced sperm quality. Hum. Reprod., 11, 513–517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vrettou, C., Palmer, G., Kanavakis, E., Tzetis, M., Antoniadi, Th., Mastrominas, M. and Traeger-Synodinos, J. (1999) A widely applicable strategy for single cell genotyping of ß-thalassaemia mutations using DGGE analysis: application to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat. Diagn., 19, 1209–1216.[Web of Science][Medline]

Welsh, M.J., Tsui, L-C., Boat, T.F. and Beaudet, A.L. (1995) Cystic Fibrosis. In Scriver, C.R., Beaudet, A.L., Sly, W.S. and Valle, D. (eds) The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. 7th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, pp. 3799–3876.

Zielenski, J., Rozmahel, R., Bozon, D., Kerem, B-S., Grzelczak, Z., Riordan, J.R., Rommens, J. and Tsui, L.-C. (1991) Genomic DNA sequence of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Genomics, 10, 214–222.[Web of Science][Medline]

Submitted on August 28, 2001; resubmitted on February 13, 2002; accepted on May 22, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vrettou, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kanavakis, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vrettou, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kanavakis, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?