Skip Navigation


Mol. Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on March 25, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/6/461    most recent
gah051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (45)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inzunza, J.
Right arrow Articles by Malmgren, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inzunza, J.
Right arrow Articles by Malmgren, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 461-466, 2004
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004

Comparative genomic hybridization and karyotyping of human embryonic stem cells reveals the occurrence of an isodicentric X chromosome after long-term cultivation

J. Inzunza1,3, S. Sahlén2, K. Holmberg2, A.-M. Strömberg1, H. Teerijoki1, E. Blennow2, O. Hovatta1 and H. Malmgren2

1Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, S-141 86 Stockholm and 2Department of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: jose.inzunza{at}mednut.ki.se

Human embryonic stem (hES) cells are important research tools in studies of the physiology of early tissue differentiation. In addition, prospects are high regarding the use of these cells for successful cell transplantation. However, one concern has been that cultivation of these cells over many passages might induce chromosomal changes. It is thus important to investigate these cell lines, and check that a normal chromosomal content is retained even during long-term in vitro culture. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to analyse three hES cell lines derived in our laboratory and cultured continuously for 30–42 weeks, comprising 35–39 cell passages. CGH could be successfully performed in 48 out of a total of 50 isolated single cells (96%). All three lines (HS181, HS235 and HS237) were shown to have a normal chromosomal content when analysed by both single cell CGH and by karyotyping up to passages 39, 39 and 35 respectively. No aneuploidies or larger deletions or amplifications were detected, and they were female (46,XX). However, HS237 was reanalysed at passage 61, and at that point an aberrant X chromosome was detected by karyotyping. The aberration was confirmed and characterized by single cell CGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, 46,X,idic(X)(q21). Thus, chromosomal aberrations may occur over time in stem cell lines, and continuous analysis of these cells during cultivation is crucial. Single cell CGH is a method that can be used for continuous analysis of the hES cell lines during cultivation, in order to detect chromosome imbalance.

Key words: chromosome/comparative genomic hybridization/culture/human embryonic stem cells


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Strom, J. Inzunza, K.-H. Grinnemo, K. Holmberg, E. Matilainen, A.-M. Stromberg, E. Blennow, and O. Hovatta
Mechanical isolation of the inner cell mass is effective in derivation of new human embryonic stem cell lines
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3051 - 3058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
C. Allegrucci and L.E. Young
Differences between human embryonic stem cell lines
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 103 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
T. Enver, S. Soneji, C. Joshi, J. Brown, F. Iborra, T. Orntoft, T. Thykjaer, E. Maltby, K. Smith, R. A. Dawud, et al.
Cellular differentiation hierarchies in normal and culture-adapted human embryonic stem cells
Hum. Mol. Genet., November 1, 2005; 14(21): 3129 - 3140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. Stojkovic, M. Lako, T. Strachan, and A. Murdoch
Derivation, growth and applications of human embryonic stem cells
Reproduction, September 1, 2004; 128(3): 259 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.