Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salpekar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Monk, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salpekar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Monk, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Human Reproduction, Vol. 7, No. 9, 839-844, September 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Embryology

The use of amplified cDNA to investigate the expression of seven imprinted genes in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos

Ashreena Salpekar1, John Huntriss1,3, Virginia Bolton2 and Marilyn Monk1,4

1 Molecular Embryology Unit, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH and 2 Assisted Conception Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8RX, UK

Abstract

Imprinted genes are characterized by expression of only one of the two alleles according to its inheritance from the mother or the father. This mono-allelic expression must arise from primary differential epigenetic modification of the parental alleles of the imprinted gene in the spermatozoon and the oocyte. Most of the information on the onset of imprinted gene expression, and on the molecular mechanisms regulating mono-allelic expression, have been derived from studies in the mouse. In this paper, we investigate the expression of seven imprinted genes in human preimplantation development. Due to limitations imposed by the rarity of human embryos available for research, our approach has been to screen amplified cDNA preparations prepared from human unfertilized oocytes and individual embryos at each of the 4-cell, 8-cell and blastocyst stages. Gene-specific primers were used to investigate expression of the imprinted genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of these amplified cDNA. We found that expression is inherently variable in the amplified cDNA from embryo to embryo but the use of several samples at each stage showed that the SNRPN, UBE3A and PEG1 genes are expressed throughout human preimplantation development. This was confirmed by direct analysis by gene-specific reverse transcription–PCR on a limited number of lysed embryos (one gene analysed per embryo). Thus, the amplified cDNA may be used to rapidly identify those imprinted genes expressed in preimplantation development and, hence, those genes amenable to investigation of the epigenetic mechanisms regulating mono-allelic expression. Confirmation of preimplantation expression also identifies those imprinted diseases amenable to preimplantation diagnosis, and the imprinted genes which may be used in assessment of possible perturbations of imprinting following new procedures in assisted reproduction. Our series of single embryo amplified cDNA are established as a valuable resource for comparative studies of gene expression within one embryo and between embryos throughout early human development. The amplified cDNA thus circumvent the need for a continuous supply of human embryos for studies on embryonic gene expression.

embryonic cDNA/genomic imprinting/human embryonic development/imprinted gene expression

Notes

3 Present address: Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, D Floor, Leeds General Infirmary, Belmont Grove, Leeds LS2 9NS, UK

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mmonk{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. J. Amor and J. Halliday
A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2826 - 2834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. Thurston, J. Taylor, J. Gardner, K. D Sinclair, and L. E Young
Monoallelic expression of nine imprinted genes in the sheep embryo occurs after the blastocyst stage
Reproduction, January 1, 2008; 135(1): 29 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
K.-P. Kim, A. Thurston, C. Mummery, D. Ward-van Oostwaard, H. Priddle, C. Allegrucci, C. Denning, and L. Young
Gene-specific vulnerability to imprinting variability in human embryonic stem cell lines
Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1731 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
J. Adjaye, R. Herwig, T. C. Brink, D. Herrmann, B. Greber, S. Sudheer, D. Groth, J. W. Carnwath, H. Lehrach, and H. Niemann
Conserved molecular portraits of bovine and human blastocysts as a consequence of the transition from maternal to embryonic control of gene expression
Physiol Genomics, October 19, 2007; 31(2): 315 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
P. J. Rugg-Gunn, A. C. Ferguson-Smith, and R. A. Pedersen
Status of genomic imprinting in human embryonic stem cells as revealed by a large cohort of independently derived and maintained lines
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2007; 16(R2): R243 - R251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
S. Sudheer and J. Adjaye
Functional genomics of human pre-implantation development
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, July 31, 2007; (2007) elm012v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. M. Kocabas, J. Crosby, P. J. Ross, H. H. Otu, Z. Beyhan, H. Can, W.-L. Tam, G. J. M. Rosa, R. G. Halgren, B. Lim, et al.
The transcriptome of human oocytes
PNAS, September 19, 2006; 103(38): 14027 - 14032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Assou, T. Anahory, V. Pantesco, T. Le Carrour, F. Pellestor, B. Klein, L. Reyftmann, H. Dechaud, J. De Vos, and S. Hamamah
The human cumulus-oocyte complex gene-expression profile
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1705 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. T. Ruddock, K. J. Wilson, M. A. Cooney, N. A. Korfiatis, R. T. Tecirlioglu, and A. J. French
Analysis of Imprinted Messenger RNA Expression During Bovine Preimplantation Development
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 1131 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
E. Geuns, M. De Rycke, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers
Methylation imprints of the imprint control region of the SNRPN-gene in human gametes and preimplantation embryos
Hum. Mol. Genet., November 15, 2003; 12(22): 2873 - 2879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. R. Ghassemifar, J. J. Eckert, F. D. Houghton, H. M. Picton, H. J. Leese, and T. P. Fleming
Gene expression regulating epithelial intercellular junction biogenesis during human blastocyst development in vitro
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 9(5): 245 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. De Rycke, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies: Risk analysis and epigenetic inheritance
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2487 - 2494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.